BOC vs CODI

For growth investors, Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC) is the stronger pick with 12.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 8% for Compass Diversified (CODI). Analysts rate Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Compass Diversified (CODI) delivered a total return of -37.

0%, compared to -58. 5% for Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODI returned +52. 1% versus BOC's -48. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

30β versus Compass Diversified's 1. 09β — meaning CODI is approximately 258% more volatile than BOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 3% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC) is pulling ahead at 12.

5% versus 4. 8% for Compass Diversified (CODI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boston Omaha Corporation grew EPS 82. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1426. 1% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOC leads at 23. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC) is the more profitable company, earning -1.

2% net margin versus -12. 2% for Compass Diversified — meaning it keeps -1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODI leads at 2. 3% versus -7. 8% for BOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOC leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BOC: 49.

1% to $17. 00.

In this comparison, CODI (4.

3% yield) pays a dividend. BOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

30)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOC: -48. 2%, CODI: +52. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BOC (Communication Services) and CODI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CODI pays a dividend while BOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.