Oil & Gas Drilling
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BORR vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
BORR vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.43B | $1.28B | $79.97B | $33.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.02B | $1M | $35.71B | $22.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $75M | $-498M | $3.35B | $1.54B |
| Gross Margin | 73.2% | -61.2% | 18.2% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | 34.7% | -367.6% | 15.3% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | 34.4x | 7.9x | 20.3x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.15B | $0.00 | $12.31B | $8.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $381M | $98M | $3.04B | $2.21B |
BORR vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Borr Drilling Limit… (BORR) | 100 | 292.5 | +192.5% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 196.9 | +96.9% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BORR vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BORR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth -46.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.0%
- +226.8% vs SOC's -38.7%
SOC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 9.5% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3%
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 17.1x)
SLB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 2.0%
- 9.4% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
- 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 6.5% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 12.1% vs -44.6%
HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 18.1% 10Y total return vs SOC's 32.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.48, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.48 vs BORR's 1.56, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 17.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs BORR's 1.56, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +226.8% vs SOC's -38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 12.1% vs -44.6% |
BORR vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BORR vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BORR leads in 3 of 6 categories
SLB leads 2 • HAL leads 1 • SOC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BORR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 28095.2x SOC's $1M. SLB is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, BORR holds the edge at +14.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $1M | $35.7B | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $502M | -$454M | $7.4B | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $75M | -$498M | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$58M | -$611M | $4.8B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.2% | -61.2% | +18.2% | +15.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.7% | -367.6% | +15.3% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | -391.5% | +9.4% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | -480.4% | +13.4% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.7% | — | +5.0% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +159.3% | -5.4% | -31.2% | +129.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BORR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, SLB trades at a 34% valuation discount to BORR's 34.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BORR's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLB's 12.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $1.3B | $80.0B | $33.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $1.2B | $89.2B | $39.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.41x | -3.07x | 22.67x | 26.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.88x | 20.26x | 17.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.82x | — | 12.11x | 11.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.40x | — | 2.24x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.27x | 2.36x | 2.90x | 3.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.25x | — | 16.68x | 19.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. SLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BORR's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BORR scores 5/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.6% | -113.8% | +13.9% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | -28.9% | +6.5% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | -44.6% | +12.1% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.2% | -37.5% | +14.3% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.76x | — | 0.45x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | -$98M | $9.3B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $381M | $98M | $3.0B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $0 | $12.3B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.41x | -3.47x | 9.40x | 9.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BORR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BORR five years ago would be worth $33,209 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,275 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, BORR leads with a +226.8% total return vs SOC's -38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAL at 11.8% vs BORR's -4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +46.6% | +9.5% | +33.2% | +35.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +226.8% | -38.7% | +58.6% | +100.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.8% | +26.6% | +21.3% | +39.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +232.1% | +32.7% | +82.8% | +87.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.2% | +32.5% | -8.9% | +18.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.5% | +8.2% | +6.7% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
HAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BORR's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAL currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.56x | 1.42x | 0.83x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.33 | $35.00 | $57.20 | $42.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.55 | $3.72 | $31.64 | $19.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +36.7% | +93.1% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 42.5 | 47.7 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.4M | 5.2M | 16.2M | 14.9M |
Analyst Outlook
SLB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BORR as "Hold", SOC as "Buy", SLB as "Buy", HAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 117.9% upside for SOC (target: $28) vs -2.6% for BORR (target: $6). For income investors, SLB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.02% vs BORR's 0.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.70 | $28.00 | $58.66 | $39.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 4 | 66 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | +2.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — | $1.08 | $0.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
BORR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SLB leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook).
BORR vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BORR or SOC or SLB or HAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Borr Drilling Limited (BORR) is the stronger pick with 1.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BORR or SOC or SLB or HAL?
On trailing P/E, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the cheapest at 22. 7x versus Borr Drilling Limited at 34. 4x. On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BORR or SOC or SLB or HAL?
Over the past 5 years, Borr Drilling Limited (BORR) delivered a total return of +232.
1%, compared to +32. 7% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +32. 5% versus BORR's -68. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BORR or SOC or SLB or HAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus Borr Drilling Limited's 1. 56β — meaning BORR is approximately 225% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SLB N. V. (SLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 176% for Borr Drilling Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BORR or SOC or SLB or HAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Borr Drilling Limited (BORR) is pulling ahead at 1.
0% versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp. grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BORR leads at 32. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BORR or SOC or SLB or HAL?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BORR leads at 31. 5% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BORR leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BORR or SOC or SLB or HAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for SLB N. V. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 117. 9% to $28. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BORR or SOC or SLB or HAL?
In this comparison, SLB (2.
0% yield), HAL (1. 7% yield), BORR (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BORR or SOC or SLB or HAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), 1. 7% yield). Borr Drilling Limited (BORR) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +18. 1%, BORR: -68. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BORR and SOC and SLB and HAL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SLB, HAL pay a dividend while BORR, SOC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.