BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$26M
5Y Perf.+126.4%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BOSC vs RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RFIL
RF Industries, Ltd.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$165M
5Y Perf.+175.2%
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$27.00B
5Y Perf.+1033.5%
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$2.33B
5Y Perf.+229.0%
BOSC vs RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BOSC | RFIL | MTSI | COHU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $26M | $165M | $27.00B | $2.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48M | $80M | $1.07B | $481M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $270K | $177M | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 23.7% | 32.0% | 55.3% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 3.4% | 16.0% | -10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 11.7x | 26.3x | 73.3x | 85.0x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $27M | $538M | $359M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $5M | $112M | $227M |
BOSC vs RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BOSC
RFIL
MTSI
COHU
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| B.O.S. Better Onlin… (BOSC) | 100 | 226.4 | +126.4% |
| RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) | 100 | 275.2 | +175.2% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 1133.5 | +1033.5% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 329.0 | +229.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOSC vs RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MTSI leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. RFIL also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.
The Defensive Pick
BOSC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 0.55, current ratio 2.28x
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 85.0x)
- Beta 0.55 vs COHU's 2.12, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
RFIL
RF Industries, Ltd.
The Income Pick
RFIL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.11
- Rev growth 24.3%, EPS growth 101.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.9%
- +284.9% vs BOSC's +18.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
MTSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs RFIL's 5.6%
- 32.6% revenue growth vs BOSC's -9.6%
- 16.5% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
- 8.6% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -5.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
The Secondary Option
COHU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MTSI | 32.6% revenue growth vs BOSC's -9.6% |
| Value | BOSC | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 85.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | MTSI | 16.5% margin vs COHU's -11.5% |
| Stability / Safety | BOSC | Beta 0.55 vs COHU's 2.12, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | RFIL | +284.9% vs BOSC's +18.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MTSI | 8.6% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -5.7% |
BOSC vs RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
FY 2019
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2014
BOSC vs RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBOSCLAGGINGCOHU
Who Leads Where
MTSI leads in 2 of 6 categories
BOSC leads 2 • RFIL leads 0 • COHU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓COHUCohu, Inc.
0leads
RFILRF Industries, Ltd.
0leads
MTSIMACOM Technology Solu…
2leads
BOSCB.O.S. Better Online …
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MTSIvs RFILMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MTSI4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BOSC4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BOSC5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MTSI4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 22.2x BOSC's $48M. MTSI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, COHU holds the edge at +29.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48M | $80M | $1.1B | $481M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $5M | $223M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $270,000 | $177M | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $4M | $168M | $32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +32.0% | +55.3% | +25.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +3.4% | +16.0% | -10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +0.3% | +16.5% | -11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +5.5% | +15.6% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.9% | -1.2% | +22.5% | +29.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +100.0% | +42.9% | +60.6% |
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BOSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, BOSC trades at a 99% valuation discount to RFIL's 2182.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BOSC's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTSI's 142.1x.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26M | $165M | $27.0B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $187M | $27.4B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.67x | 2182.86x | -492.99x | -31.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.34x | 73.25x | 84.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.93x | 35.39x | 142.12x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 2.05x | 27.91x | 5.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 4.67x | 20.06x | 2.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.01x | 38.04x | 140.00x | 216.85x |
BOSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOSC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-7 for COHU. BOSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RFIL's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RFIL scores 8/9 vs COHU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +0.8% | +13.2% | -6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | +0.4% | +8.6% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | +3.6% | +6.0% | -5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +5.2% | +7.6% | -5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.76x | 0.41x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $22M | $426M | $132M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $5M | $112M | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $27M | $538M | $359M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.84x | — | 32.37x | -168.82x |
BOSC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTSI five years ago would be worth $67,774 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,550 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, RFIL leads with a +284.9% total return vs BOSC's +18.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTSI at 87.1% vs COHU's 13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.0% | +169.0% | +105.7% | +101.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.5% | +284.9% | +200.8% | +206.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.9% | +283.9% | +554.9% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.4% | +138.7% | +577.7% | +35.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.4% | +561.0% | +836.0% | +348.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.9% | +56.6% | +87.1% | +13.6% |
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOSC and MTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BOSC is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COHU's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTSI currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs BOSC's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 2.11x | 1.69x | 2.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.72 | $15.80 | $364.00 | $50.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.62 | $3.82 | $117.05 | $15.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.7% | +96.7% | +98.9% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 61.0 | 79.1 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 247K | 1.1M | 959K |
Evenly matched — BOSC and MTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RFIL as "Buy", MTSI as "Buy", COHU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.4% upside for COHU (target: $50) vs -7.7% for MTSI (target: $332).
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … | COHUCohu, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $332.00 | $49.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 23 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.3% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
MTSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BOSC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallB.O.S. Better Online Soluti… (BOSC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BOSC vs RFIL vs MTSI vs COHU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOSC or RFIL or MTSI or COHU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger pick with 32. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOSC or RFIL or MTSI or COHU?
On trailing P/E, B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus RF Industries, Ltd. at 2182. 9x. On forward P/E, RF Industries, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 26. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOSC or RFIL or MTSI or COHU?
Over the past 5 years, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) delivered a total return of +577. 7%, compared to +35. 5% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTSI returned +836. 0% versus BOSC's +112. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOSC or RFIL or MTSI or COHU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Cohu, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning COHU is approximately 288% more volatile than BOSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 76% for RF Industries, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOSC or RFIL or MTSI or COHU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is pulling ahead at 32. 6% versus -9. 6% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RF Industries, Ltd. grew EPS 101. 1% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTSI leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOSC or RFIL or MTSI or COHU?
B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTSI leads at 13. 4% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTSI leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOSC or RFIL or MTSI or COHU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) trades at 26. 3x forward P/E versus 85. 0x for Cohu, Inc. — 58. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHU: 0. 4% to $49. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOSC or RFIL or MTSI or COHU?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BOSC or RFIL or MTSI or COHU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), +112. 4% 10Y return). Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOSC: +112. 4%, COHU: +348. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOSC and RFIL and MTSI and COHU?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOSC (Technology) and RFIL (Industrials) and MTSI (Technology) and COHU (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; RFIL is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BOSC: 15.9% · RFIL: -1.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(BOSC: 11.7x · RFIL: 2182.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.