Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BOTJ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
BOTJ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $112M | $207M | $444M | $20.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $90M | $208M | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $14M | $35M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 77.7% | 54.7% | 51.6% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | 7.0% | 23.3% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 11.8x | 10.3x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $52M | $180M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $119M | $225M | $599M |
BOTJ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of the James F… (BOTJ) | 100 | 288.2 | +188.2% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 349.9 | +249.9% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOTJ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOTJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and bank quality is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 496.36x
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Beta 0.15 vs BWFG's 0.65, lower leverage
- +75.9% vs FIS's -49.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 1.7%
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- 1.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2%
BWFG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.1%, EPS growth 261.8%
- 198.5% 10Y total return vs BOTJ's 155.2%
- PEG 0.24 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 6.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.90
- 22.9% margin vs BOTJ's 14.6%
- 7.5% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.90 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs BOTJ's 14.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs BWFG's 0.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.9% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.0% |
BOTJ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BOTJ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories
BOTJ leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • BWFG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 188.5x BOTJ's $62M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOTJ's 14.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $90M | $208M | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $9M | $53M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $14M | $35M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $11M | -$5M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +54.7% | +51.6% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +7.0% | +23.3% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +16.0% | +16.9% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +12.4% | -2.4% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +63.0% | +2.1% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, BOTJ trades at a 76% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.29x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $112M | $207M | $444M | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $93M | $140M | $398M | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.44x | 14.70x | 12.50x | 52.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.79x | 10.27x | 6.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.90x | 2.90x | 0.29x | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.44x | 15.69x | 7.58x | 6.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.80x | 2.29x | 2.14x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 1.11x | 1.44x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.72x | 19.90x | 16.98x | 7.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BOTJ and FIS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. BOTJ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWFG's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BOTJ scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +7.8% | +12.2% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.7% | +2.0% | +8.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +0.6% | +4.4% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.28x | 0.60x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | -$67M | -$45M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $119M | $225M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $52M | $180M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.80x | 0.16x | 0.49x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOTJ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWFG five years ago would be worth $21,150 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BOTJ leads with a +75.9% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOTJ at 42.8% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.6% | +24.3% | +24.4% | -38.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +75.9% | +52.1% | +57.3% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.2% | +153.7% | +132.8% | -18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.8% | +69.0% | +111.5% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.2% | +149.0% | +198.5% | -25.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.8% | +36.4% | +32.5% | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOTJ and BWFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BOTJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWFG's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWFG currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.50x | 0.65x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.49 | $22.62 | $56.48 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.00 | $12.83 | $33.85 | $37.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +94.9% | +98.5% | +47.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.9 | 51.2 | 63.3 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 41K | 44K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CZWI and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", BWFG as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs BWFG's 1.44%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $62.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 3 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +1.7% | +1.4% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $0.37 | $0.80 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.3% | +7.0% |
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BOTJ leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
BOTJ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOTJ or CZWI or BWFG or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the stronger pick with 6. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOTJ or CZWI or BWFG or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOTJ or CZWI or BWFG or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) delivered a total return of +111. 5%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWFG returned +198. 5% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOTJ or CZWI or BWFG or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 65β — meaning BWFG is approximately 320% more volatile than BOTJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 60% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOTJ or CZWI or BWFG or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is pulling ahead at 6. 1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOTJ or CZWI or BWFG or FIS?
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 9% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWFG leads at 23. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOTJ leads at 77. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOTJ or CZWI or BWFG or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOTJ or CZWI or BWFG or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 4% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG).
09Is BOTJ or CZWI or BWFG or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 1. 6% yield, +155. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOTJ: +155. 2%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOTJ and CZWI and BWFG and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOTJ (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and BWFG (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOTJ is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.