Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
BOTJ logo
BOTJ
CZWI logo
CZWI
MNSB logo
MNSB
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BOTJ vs CZWI vs MNSB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BOTJ
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$112M
5Y Perf.+188.2%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$184M
5Y Perf.+88.9%

BOTJ vs CZWI vs MNSB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BOTJ logoBOTJ
CZWI logoCZWI
MNSB logoMNSB
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$112M$207M$184M
Revenue (TTM)$62M$90M$135M
Net Income (TTM)$9M$14M$16M
Gross Margin77.7%54.7%54.3%
Operating Margin18.0%7.0%14.1%
Forward P/E12.4x11.8x11.0x
Total Debt$9M$52M$70M
Cash & Equiv.$29M$119M$26M

BOTJ vs CZWI vs MNSBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BOTJ
CZWI
MNSB
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Bank of the James F… (BOTJ)100288.2+188.2%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100188.9+88.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BOTJ vs CZWI vs MNSB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BOTJ leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇BOTJ emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
BOTJ
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BOTJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 13.7%
  • 155.2% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 496.36x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 1.7%
  • Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • 1.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs BOTJ's 1.6%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BOTJ's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BOTJ's 0.6%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBOTJ logoBOTJ6.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueBOTJ logoBOTJPEG 0.90 vs 2.32
Quality / MarginsMNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs BOTJ's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyBOTJ logoBOTJBeta 0.15 vs MNSB's 0.60, lower leverage
DividendsCZWI logoCZWI1.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs BOTJ's 1.6%
Momentum (1Y)BOTJ logoBOTJ+75.9% vs MNSB's +37.2%
Efficiency (ROA)MNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs BOTJ's 0.6%

BOTJ vs CZWI vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BOTJBank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Community Banking
67.1%$39M
All Other Segments
15.5%$9M
Investment Advisory Services
9.1%$5M
Mortgage
8.3%$5M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M

BOTJ vs CZWI vs MNSB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBOTJLAGGINGMNSB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BOTJ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

MNSB is the larger business by revenue, generating $135M annually — 2.2x BOTJ's $62M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.0% (CZWI) to 11.5% (MNSB).

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$62M$90M$135M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$12M$9M$23M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$9M$14M$16M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M$11M$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.7%+54.7%+54.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.0%+7.0%+14.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.6%+16.0%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.6%+12.4%+7.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.7%+63.0%+120.9%
BOTJ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BOTJ leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.4x trailing earnings, BOTJ trades at a 15% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BOTJ offers better value at 0.90x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Market CapShares × price$112M$207M$184M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$93M$140M$227M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.44x14.70x14.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.79x11.03x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x2.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.44x15.69x11.90x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.80x2.29x1.35x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.41x1.11x0.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.72x19.90x17.26x
BOTJ leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BOTJ leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

BOTJ delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. BOTJ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNSB's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BOTJ scores 7/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.1%+7.8%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+0.8%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.7%+2.0%+5.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.0%+0.6%+6.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9765
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.28x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$20M-$67M$43M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$29M$119M$26M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$52M$70M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.80x0.16x0.31x
BOTJ leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BOTJ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, BOTJ leads with a +75.9% total return vs MNSB's +37.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOTJ at 42.8% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.6%+24.3%+26.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+75.9%+52.1%+37.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+191.2%+153.7%+13.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.8%+69.0%+18.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.2%+149.0%+135.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+42.8%+36.4%+4.2%
BOTJ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BOTJ and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BOTJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs BOTJ's 93.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.15x0.50x0.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$26.49$22.62$25.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.00$12.83$17.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.5%+94.9%+99.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10072.951.265.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded14K41K45K
Evenly matched — BOTJ and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CZWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold". For income investors, CZWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.73% vs MNSB's 1.60%.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts21
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+1.7%+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises060
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.40$0.37$0.40
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.0%+2.4%
CZWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BOTJ leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallBank of the James Financial… (BOTJ)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BOTJ vs CZWI vs MNSB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BOTJ or CZWI or MNSB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BOTJ or CZWI or MNSB?

On trailing P/E, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BOTJ or CZWI or MNSB?

Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOTJ returned +155. 2% versus MNSB's +135. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BOTJ or CZWI or MNSB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning MNSB is approximately 287% more volatile than BOTJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 32% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BOTJ or CZWI or MNSB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BOTJ or CZWI or MNSB?

Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BOTJ leads at 17. 8% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOTJ leads at 77. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BOTJ or CZWI or MNSB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BOTJ or CZWI or MNSB?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 1. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB).

09

Is BOTJ or CZWI or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 1. 6% yield, +155. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOTJ: +155. 2%, MNSB: +135. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BOTJ and CZWI and MNSB?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.