Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BOTJ vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs NKSH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Information Technology Services
Banks - Regional
BOTJ vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs NKSH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Information Technology Services | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $112M | $273M | $896.00B | $20.26B | $231M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $115M | $280.33B | $11.66B | $85M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $18M | $57.05B | $2.67B | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 77.7% | 74.7% | 60.0% | 37.6% | 65.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | 19.0% | 25.9% | 17.9% | 22.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 12.8x | 14.4x | 6.2x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $43M | $942.38B | $4.01B | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $161M | $343.34B | $599M | $8M |
BOTJ vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs NKSH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of the James F… (BOTJ) | 100 | 288.2 | +188.2% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| National Bankshares… (NKSH) | 100 | 127.0 | +27.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOTJ vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs NKSH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOTJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 496.36x
- Beta 0.15 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
- +75.9% vs FIS's -49.4%
FXNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- NIM 3.6% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 258.5%
- 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
- PEG 0.26 vs FXNC's 8.59
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Among these 5 stocks, NKSH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs BOTJ's 14.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.9% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs FXNC's 0.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs 7.7% |
BOTJ vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs NKSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BOTJ vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs NKSH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BOTJ leads in 1 of 6 categories
FXNC leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • NKSH leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4533.1x BOTJ's $62M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOTJ's 14.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $115M | $280.3B | $11.7B | $85M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $25M | $81.4B | $4.1B | $20M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $18M | $57.0B | $2.7B | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $21M | $100.9B | $2.8B | $17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +74.7% | +60.0% | +37.6% | +65.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +19.0% | +25.9% | +17.9% | +22.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +15.4% | +20.4% | +22.9% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +18.2% | +36.0% | +23.9% | +20.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +30.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +7.1% | +16.0% | +30.6% | +91.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BOTJ and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, BOTJ trades at a 76% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BOTJ offers better value at 0.90x vs NKSH's 140.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $112M | $273M | $896.0B | $20.3B | $231M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $93M | $155M | $1.50T | $23.7B | $225M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.44x | 15.40x | 16.00x | 52.27x | 14.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.82x | 14.40x | 6.24x | 11.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.90x | 10.32x | 0.90x | 2.14x | 140.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.44x | 7.05x | 18.36x | 6.50x | 11.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.80x | 2.43x | 3.20x | 1.90x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 1.46x | 2.47x | 1.46x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.72x | 12.99x | 8.88x | 7.21x | 15.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FIS and NKSH each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $9 for NKSH. NKSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NKSH scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +10.0% | +15.9% | +18.4% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.9% | +1.3% | +7.5% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.7% | +7.7% | +4.5% | +6.0% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +9.9% | +8.9% | +6.6% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.23x | 2.60x | 0.29x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | -$118M | $599.0B | $3.4B | -$6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $161M | $343.3B | $599M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $43M | $942.4B | $4.0B | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.80x | 0.84x | 0.74x | 21.16x | 0.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOTJ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BOTJ leads with a +75.9% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOTJ at 42.8% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.6% | +24.4% | -0.5% | -38.9% | +12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +75.9% | +57.8% | +21.8% | -49.4% | +42.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.2% | +103.7% | +138.2% | -18.9% | +37.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.8% | +71.0% | +118.2% | -67.3% | +24.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.2% | +258.5% | +465.8% | -25.6% | +54.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.8% | +26.8% | +33.6% | -6.8% | +11.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOTJ and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BOTJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FXNC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.52x | 0.94x | 0.61x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.49 | $30.51 | $337.25 | $82.74 | $40.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.00 | $18.31 | $262.71 | $37.91 | $24.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +99.0% | +95.1% | +47.4% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.9 | 67.0 | 59.1 | 30.8 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 79K | 7.0M | 5.6M | 49K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FXNC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", NKSH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -30.4% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs BOTJ's 1.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.00 | $339.75 | $62.88 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 61 | 37 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +2.0% | +1.9% | +4.2% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $0.61 | $5.95 | $1.63 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +3.9% | +7.0% | 0.0% |
BOTJ leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Total Returns. 5 categories are tied.
BOTJ vs FXNC vs JPM vs FIS vs NKSH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOTJ or FXNC or JPM or FIS or NKSH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOTJ or FXNC or JPM or FIS or NKSH?
On trailing P/E, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 140. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOTJ or FXNC or JPM or FIS or NKSH?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOTJ or FXNC or JPM or FIS or NKSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 510% more volatile than BOTJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOTJ or FXNC or JPM or FIS or NKSH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 100. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOTJ or FXNC or JPM or FIS or NKSH?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOTJ leads at 77. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOTJ or FXNC or JPM or FIS or NKSH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 140. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOTJ or FXNC or JPM or FIS or NKSH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 6% for Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ).
09Is BOTJ or FXNC or JPM or FIS or NKSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 1. 6% yield, +155. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOTJ: +155. 2%, NKSH: +54. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOTJ and FXNC and JPM and FIS and NKSH?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOTJ (Financial Services) and FXNC (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and NKSH (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOTJ is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; NKSH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.