Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BOTJ vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BOTJ vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $112M | $184M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $135M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 77.7% | 54.3% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $26M |
BOTJ vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of the James F… (BOTJ) | 100 | 288.2 | +188.2% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOTJ vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOTJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 1.6%
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 13.7%
- 155.2% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 135.4%
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 12.4x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BOTJ's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BOTJ's 0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 12.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BOTJ's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs MNSB's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, vs MNSB's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.9% vs MNSB's +37.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BOTJ's 0.6% |
BOTJ vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BOTJ vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOTJ leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNSB is the larger business by revenue, generating $135M annually — 2.2x BOTJ's $62M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.6% (BOTJ) to 11.5% (MNSB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $135M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +54.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
BOTJ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, BOTJ trades at a 12% valuation discount to MNSB's 14.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BOTJ's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $112M | $184M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $93M | $227M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.44x | 14.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.44x | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.80x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.72x | 17.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BOTJ leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOTJ delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. BOTJ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNSB's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BOTJ scores 7/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.7% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.80x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOTJ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOTJ five years ago would be worth $15,585 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, BOTJ leads with a +75.9% total return vs MNSB's +37.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOTJ at 42.8% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.6% | +26.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +75.9% | +37.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.2% | +13.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.8% | +18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.2% | +135.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.8% | +4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOTJ and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BOTJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs BOTJ's 93.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.49 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.00 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.9 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 45K |
Analyst Outlook
BOTJ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, BOTJ offers the higher dividend yield at 1.62% vs MNSB's 1.60%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
BOTJ leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
BOTJ vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOTJ or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOTJ or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 14. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOTJ or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) delivered a total return of +55. 8%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOTJ returned +155. 2% versus MNSB's +135. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOTJ or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning MNSB is approximately 287% more volatile than BOTJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 32% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOTJ or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 13. 7% for Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOTJ or MNSB?
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 4% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BOTJ leads at 17. 8% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOTJ leads at 77. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — BOTJ or MNSB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 1. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB).
08Is BOTJ or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
(BOTJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 1. 6% yield, +155. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOTJ: +155. 2%, MNSB: +135. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BOTJ and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.