Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
BOTJ logo
BOTJ
MNSB logo
MNSB
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BOTJ vs MNSB vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BOTJ
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$112M
5Y Perf.+188.2%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$184M
5Y Perf.+88.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

BOTJ vs MNSB vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BOTJ logoBOTJ
MNSB logoMNSB
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$112M$184M$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$62M$135M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$9M$16M$57.05B
Gross Margin77.7%54.3%60.0%
Operating Margin18.0%14.1%25.9%
Forward P/E12.4x11.0x14.4x
Total Debt$9M$70M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$29M$26M$343.34B

BOTJ vs MNSB vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BOTJ
MNSB
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Bank of the James F… (BOTJ)100288.2+188.2%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100188.9+88.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BOTJ vs MNSB vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BOTJ and JPM are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BOTJ
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BOTJ has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 13.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 496.36x
  • Beta 0.15, yield 1.6%, current ratio 496.36x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (11.0x vs 12.4x)
Best for: value
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs BOTJ's 155.2%
  • PEG 0.81 vs BOTJ's 0.90
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBOTJ logoBOTJ6.0% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueMNSB logoMNSBLower P/E (11.0x vs 12.4x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOTJ's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyBOTJ logoBOTJBeta 0.15 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BOTJ's 1.6%
Momentum (1Y)BOTJ logoBOTJ+75.9% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOTJ's 0.6%

BOTJ vs MNSB vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BOTJBank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Community Banking
67.1%$39M
All Other Segments
15.5%$9M
Investment Advisory Services
9.1%$5M
Mortgage
8.3%$5M
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

BOTJ vs MNSB vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBOTJLAGGINGMNSB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4533.1x BOTJ's $62M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$62M$135M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$12M$23M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$9M$16M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M$11M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.7%+54.3%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.0%+14.1%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.6%+11.5%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.6%+7.9%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.7%+120.9%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BOTJ and MNSB each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.4x trailing earnings, BOTJ trades at a 22% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BOTJ offers better value at 0.90x vs JPM's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$112M$184M$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$93M$227M$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.44x14.16x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.03x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.44x11.90x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.80x1.35x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.41x0.87x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.72x17.26x8.88x
Evenly matched — BOTJ and MNSB each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BOTJ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. BOTJ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BOTJ scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.1%+7.3%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+0.7%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.7%+5.0%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.0%+6.0%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9755
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.32x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$20M$43M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$29M$26M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$70M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.80x0.31x0.74x
BOTJ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BOTJ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, BOTJ leads with a +75.9% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOTJ at 42.8% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.6%+26.5%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+75.9%+37.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+191.2%+13.1%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.8%+18.1%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.2%+135.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+42.8%+4.2%+33.6%
BOTJ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BOTJ and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BOTJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs BOTJ's 93.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.15x0.60x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$26.49$25.17$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.00$17.86$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.5%+99.0%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10072.965.359.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded14K45K7.0M
Evenly matched — BOTJ and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MNSB as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs MNSB's 1.60%.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts161
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+1.6%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.40$0.40$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.4%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). BOTJ leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallBank of the James Financial… (BOTJ)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BOTJ vs MNSB vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BOTJ or MNSB or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BOTJ or MNSB or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BOTJ or MNSB or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MNSB's +135. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BOTJ or MNSB or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 510% more volatile than BOTJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BOTJ or MNSB or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BOTJ or MNSB or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOTJ leads at 77. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BOTJ or MNSB or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BOTJ or MNSB or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 1. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB).

09

Is BOTJ or MNSB or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 1. 6% yield, +155. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOTJ: +155. 2%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BOTJ and MNSB and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.