Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BOW vs SKWD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
BOW vs SKWD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $866M | $2.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $584M | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $174M |
| Gross Margin | 34.4% | 43.7% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 9.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $120M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $234M | $169M |
BOW vs SKWD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bowhead Specialty H… (BOW) | 100 | 98.4 | -1.6% |
| Skyward Specialty I… (SKWD) | 100 | 121.9 | +21.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOW vs SKWD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.43
- Rev growth 29.6%, EPS growth 23.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 43.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, current ratio 5110.75x
SKWD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 138.3% 10Y total return vs BOW's 10.8%
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 13.7x)
- Combined ratio 0.8 vs BOW's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.6% revenue growth vs SKWD's 23.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 13.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs BOW's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs SKWD's 0.60 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -22.7% vs BOW's -31.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs BOW's 2.6%, ROIC 18.5% vs 20.5% |
BOW vs SKWD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKWD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKWD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.5x BOW's $584M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.8% (SKWD) to 10.0% (BOW).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $584M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $174M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $342M | $475M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | +43.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +58.6% | +32.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +26.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.2% | +194.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SKWD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.2x trailing earnings, SKWD trades at a 33% valuation discount to BOW's 16.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SKWD's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BOW's 9.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $866M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $632M | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.58x | 11.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.70x | 9.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.15x | 9.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.57x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.66x | 5.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BOW and SKWD each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SKWD delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $13 for BOW. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKWD scores 6/9 vs BOW's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +18.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.5% | +18.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$234M | -$49M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $234M | $169M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $120M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 42.59x | 29.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKWD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKWD five years ago would be worth $23,827 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,076 for BOW. Over the past 12 months, SKWD leads with a -22.7% total return vs BOW's -31.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKWD at 27.2% vs BOW's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.9% | -6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.8% | -22.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | +106.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | +138.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | +138.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | +27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOW and SKWD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BOW is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKWD's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKWD currently trades 70.0% from its 52-week high vs BOW's 64.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.99 | $65.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.23 | $40.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.3% | +70.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 41.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 185K | 410K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BOW as "Buy" and SKWD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.1% upside for SKWD (target: $71) vs 18.9% for BOW (target: $31).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.33 | $70.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SKWD leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
BOW vs SKWD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOW or SKWD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc.
(BOW) is the stronger pick with 29. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 23. 2% for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (SKWD). Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (SKWD) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc. (BOW) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOW or SKWD?
On trailing P/E, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.
(SKWD) is the cheapest at 11. 2x versus Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc. at 16. 6x. On forward P/E, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOW or SKWD?
Over the past 5 years, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.
(SKWD) delivered a total return of +138. 3%, compared to +10. 8% for Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc. (BOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKWD returned +138. 3% versus BOW's +10. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOW or SKWD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc.
(BOW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning SKWD is approximately 38% more volatile than BOW relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — BOW or SKWD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc.
(BOW) is pulling ahead at 29. 6% versus 23. 2% for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (SKWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. grew EPS 41. 8% year-over-year, compared to 23. 3% for Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOW leads at 43. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOW or SKWD?
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.
(SKWD) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus 9. 8% for Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKWD leads at 15. 3% versus 12. 2% for BOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKWD leads at 44. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOW or SKWD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.
(SKWD) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKWD: 55. 1% to $70. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOW or SKWD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BOW or SKWD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc.
(BOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOW: +10. 8%, SKWD: +138. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOW and SKWD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.