Consumer Electronics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BOXL vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI vs AVGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
BOXL vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI vs AVGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $952K | $22M | $519M | $4.00B | $1.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $109M | $17M | $136M | $446M | $68.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $-9M | $-9M | $17M | $24.97B |
| Gross Margin | 30.8% | 4.9% | 37.2% | 53.9% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | -50.0% | 1.4% | 4.6% | 40.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 72.1x | 55.5x | 36.5x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $12M | $9M | $0.00 | $65.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | — | $21M | $59M | $16.18B |
BOXL vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI vs AVGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 271.1 | +171.1% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 1416.3 | +1316.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOXL vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI vs AVGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOXL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LIQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.52 vs POWI's 2.08
CLFD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.79, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 5.42x
POWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
- Beta 2.08, yield 1.2%, current ratio 6.51x
- 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs AVGO's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
AVGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 23.9%, EPS growth 287.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
- 29.0% 10Y total return vs POWI's 232.7%
- 23.9% revenue growth vs BOXL's -19.6%
- Lower P/E (36.5x vs 55.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.9% revenue growth vs BOXL's -19.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (36.5x vs 55.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.6% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs POWI's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs AVGO's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.6% vs BOXL's -35.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.9% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 14.9% vs -31.1% |
BOXL vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI vs AVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BOXL vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI vs AVGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVGO leads in 3 of 6 categories
POWI leads 1 • BOXL leads 0 • LIQT leads 0 • CLFD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 4067.2x LIQT's $17M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $109M | $17M | $136M | $446M | $68.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$6M | $6M | $41M | $38.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | -$9M | -$9M | $17M | $25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$7M | $15M | $85M | $28.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | +4.9% | +37.2% | +53.9% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.0% | -50.0% | +1.4% | +4.6% | +40.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.8% | -53.3% | -6.3% | +3.7% | +36.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | -39.3% | +10.8% | +18.9% | +42.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | +53.6% | -27.1% | +2.6% | +29.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.1% | +69.4% | -142.5% | -60.0% | +31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BOXL and CLFD and AVGO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 86.5x trailing earnings, AVGO trades at a 53% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AVGO's 58.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than POWI's 79.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $951,873 | $22M | $519M | $4.0B | $1.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $34M | $506M | $3.9B | $2.00T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | -2.59x | -64.64x | 184.18x | 86.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 72.10x | 55.51x | 36.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 61.46x | 79.69x | 58.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 1.35x | 3.46x | 9.02x | 30.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.50x | 2.14x | 2.05x | 6.01x | 24.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 21.01x | 45.93x | 72.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVGO delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-40 for BOXL. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOXL's 33.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.3% | -70.0% | -3.4% | +2.4% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.5% | -29.5% | -3.0% | +2.1% | +14.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.3% | -31.1% | +0.6% | +2.4% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.2% | — | +0.8% | +2.9% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 33.10x | 1.17x | 0.03x | — | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32M | $12M | -$13M | -$59M | $49.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | — | $21M | $59M | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $12M | $9M | $0 | $65.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.47x | -13.46x | 85.32x | — | 9.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $93,355 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $102 for BOXL. Over the past 12 months, AVGO leads with a +102.6% total return vs BOXL's -35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 88.2% vs BOXL's -58.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.2% | +54.9% | +27.1% | +93.2% | +18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.1% | +64.8% | +20.2% | +44.4% | +102.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.9% | -31.3% | +3.9% | -6.3% | +566.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -96.1% | -4.1% | -8.3% | +833.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -90.9% | +106.7% | +232.7% | +2897.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.6% | -11.8% | +1.3% | -2.2% | +88.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIQT and AVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIQT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWI's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVGO currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs BOXL's 9.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 0.52x | 1.79x | 2.08x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.15 | $3.35 | $46.76 | $78.94 | $437.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.60 | $1.30 | $24.01 | $30.86 | $198.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.9% | +68.9% | +80.2% | +91.0% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 57.0 | 57.1 | 76.1 | 68.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 401K | 50K | 146K | 967K | 23.3M |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLFD as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", AVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.7% upside for CLFD (target: $43) vs 7.6% for AVGO (target: $444). For income investors, POWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs AVGO's 0.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $43.00 | $79.00 | $443.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 8 | 16 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.2% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 18 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.84 | $2.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +2.5% | +0.3% |
AVGO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). POWI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
BOXL vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI vs AVGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOXL or LIQT or CLFD or POWI or AVGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the stronger pick with 23. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 6% for Boxlight Corporation (BOXL). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) offers the better valuation at 86. 5x trailing P/E (36. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOXL or LIQT or CLFD or POWI or AVGO?
On trailing P/E, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the cheapest at 86. 5x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x. On forward P/E, Broadcom Inc. is actually cheaper at 36. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOXL or LIQT or CLFD or POWI or AVGO?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) delivered a total return of +833. 6%, compared to -99. 0% for Boxlight Corporation (BOXL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +29. 0% versus BOXL's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOXL or LIQT or CLFD or POWI or AVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning POWI is approximately 298% more volatile than LIQT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 33% for Boxlight Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOXL or LIQT or CLFD or POWI or AVGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is pulling ahead at 23. 9% versus -19. 6% for Boxlight Corporation (BOXL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadcom Inc. grew EPS 287. 8% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOXL or LIQT or CLFD or POWI or AVGO?
Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOXL or LIQT or CLFD or POWI or AVGO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) trades at 36. 5x forward P/E versus 72. 1x for Clearfield, Inc. — 35. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLFD: 14. 7% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOXL or LIQT or CLFD or POWI or AVGO?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield), AVGO (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. BOXL, LIQT, CLFD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BOXL or LIQT or CLFD or POWI or AVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52)). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIQT: -90. 9%, CLFD: +106. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOXL and LIQT and CLFD and POWI and AVGO?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOXL (Technology) and LIQT (Industrials) and CLFD (Technology) and POWI (Technology) and AVGO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock. POWI, AVGO pay a dividend while BOXL, LIQT, CLFD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.