Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BRN vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Regulated Water
BRN vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $14M | $58M | $427M | $1.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $637M | $571M | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-77M | $-41M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 8.6% | 21.2% | 11.5% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | -50.9% | 10.2% | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 41.7x |
| Total Debt | $264K | $318M | $383M | $374M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $6M | $18M | $18M |
BRN vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barnwell Industries… (BRN) | 100 | 191.4 | +91.4% |
| KLX Energy Services… (KLXE) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 485.2 | +385.2% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 283.2 | +183.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRN vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KLXE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.76, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21
NINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +15.1% vs BRN's -15.9%
WTTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -33.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
- 26.6% 10Y total return vs NINE's -62.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 40.4%, current ratio 1.57x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.1% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.5% margin vs BRN's -53.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs BRN's -15.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs BRN's -30.7%, ROIC 2.3% vs -61.9% |
BRN vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BRN vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WTTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
KLXE leads 1 • NINE leads 1 • BRN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — KLXE and WTTR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 112.5x BRN's $12M. WTTR is the more profitable business, keeping 1.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRN's -53.1%. On growth, WTTR holds the edge at -2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $637M | $571M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $160M | $61M | $217M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$77M | -$41M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$607,000 | -$42M | -$7M | -$95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +21.2% | +11.5% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -50.9% | +10.2% | +2.0% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.1% | -12.1% | -7.2% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | -6.5% | -1.2% | -6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.2% | -5.3% | -4.4% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.6% | +13.3% | -34.6% | -4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KLXE leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KLXE's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $58M | $427M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $371M | $791M | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.61x | -0.79x | -7.88x | 84.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 41.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.71x | 337.01x | 10.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.02x | 0.09x | — | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | — | — | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WTTR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTTR delivers a 2.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-81 for BRN. BRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WTTR's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KLXE scores 3/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.6% | — | — | +2.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.7% | -21.3% | -11.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -61.9% | -9.4% | +0.7% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.5% | -11.4% | +0.9% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — | — | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $313M | $364M | $356M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $6M | $18M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $264,000 | $318M | $383M | $374M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -991.14x | -0.67x | 0.24x | 1.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,717 for KLXE. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs BRN's -15.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NINE at 35.7% vs KLXE's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.5% | +68.0% | +2682.5% | +52.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.9% | +65.5% | +1505.8% | +134.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.9% | -68.3% | +150.0% | +135.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.3% | -72.8% | +385.2% | +158.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.3% | -97.6% | -62.3% | +26.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.1% | -31.8% | +35.7% | +33.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRN and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRN is the less volatile stock with a -0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs BRN's 48.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.30x | 0.76x | 3.21x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.28 | $4.06 | $10.23 | $17.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.93 | $1.46 | $0.00 | $7.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.7% | +80.3% | +96.3% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 56.9 | 82.9 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 923K | 307K | 125K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
WTTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NINE as "Hold", WTTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -4.9% for WTTR (target: $16). WTTR is the only dividend payer here at 1.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 | $16.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 9 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
WTTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). KLXE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BRN vs KLXE vs NINE vs WTTR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRN or KLXE or NINE or WTTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the stronger pick with -3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) offers the better valuation at 84. 1x trailing P/E (41. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BRN or KLXE or NINE or WTTR?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -72. 8% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTTR returned +26. 6% versus KLXE's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BRN or KLXE or NINE or WTTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Barnwell Industries, Inc.
(BRN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 30β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately -1172% more volatile than BRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Barnwell Industries, Inc. (BRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 40% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BRN or KLXE or NINE or WTTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is pulling ahead at -3. 1% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nine Energy Service, Inc. grew EPS -12. 6% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Select Water Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WTTR leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BRN or KLXE or NINE or WTTR?
Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -50. 4% for Barnwell Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTTR leads at 2. 5% versus -39. 1% for BRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KLXE leads at 21. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BRN or KLXE or NINE or WTTR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82.
7% to $18. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BRN or KLXE or NINE or WTTR?
In this comparison, WTTR (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. BRN, KLXE, NINE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BRN or KLXE or NINE or WTTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Barnwell Industries, Inc.
(BRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 30)). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRN: -27. 3%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BRN and KLXE and NINE and WTTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (BRN (Energy) and KLXE (Energy) and NINE (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WTTR pays a dividend while BRN, KLXE, NINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.