BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-46.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BRN vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SOC
Sable Offshore Corp.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Market Cap$1.84T
5Y Perf.+32.5%
BRN vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BRN | SOC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $14M | $1.84T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-498M |
| Gross Margin | 8.6% | -8.7% |
| Operating Margin | -50.9% | -367.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $264K | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $98M |
BRN vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BRN
SOC
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barnwell Industries… (BRN) | 100 | 53.6 | -46.4% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRN vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BRN and SOC are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Sable Offshore Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
BRN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.30, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 1.11x
- Beta -0.30, current ratio 1.11x
- -53.1% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
SOC
Sable Offshore Corp.
The Growth Play
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 40.6%
- 32.4% 10Y total return vs BRN's -27.3%
- 9.5% revenue growth vs BRN's -36.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SOC | 9.5% revenue growth vs BRN's -36.9% |
| Quality / Margins | BRN | -53.1% margin vs SOC's -391.5% |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BRN | -15.9% vs SOC's -36.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SOC | -28.9% ROA vs BRN's -30.7%, ROIC -44.6% vs -61.9% |
BRN vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
BRN vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBRNLAGGINGSOC
SOCSable Offshore Corp.
2leads
BRNBarnwell Industries, …
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SOCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BRN5/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SOC5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SOC5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
BRN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12M annually — 9.8x SOC's $1M. BRN is the more profitable business, keeping -53.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%.
| Metric | BRNBarnwell Industri… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$454M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$498M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$607,000 | -$611M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | -8.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -50.9% | -367.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.1% | -391.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | -480.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.6% | -5.4% |
BRN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BRN and SOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BRNBarnwell Industri… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $1.84T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $1.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.61x | -3.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.02x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 2359.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — BRN and SOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BRN delivers a -80.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-81 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC.
| Metric | BRNBarnwell Industri… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.6% | -113.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.7% | -28.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -61.9% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.5% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $264,000 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -991.14x | -2.28x |
SOC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOC five years ago would be worth $13,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,072 for BRN. Over the past 12 months, BRN leads with a -15.9% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOC at 8.2% vs BRN's -25.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BRNBarnwell Industri… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.5% | +9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.9% | -36.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.9% | +26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.3% | +32.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.3% | +32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.1% | +8.2% |
SOC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRN is the less volatile stock with a -0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BRN currently trades 48.7% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BRNBarnwell Industri… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.30x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.28 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.93 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.7% | +36.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 923K | 5.4M |
BRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | BRNBarnwell Industri… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
BRN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). SOC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallBarnwell Industries, Inc. (BRN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BRN vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRN or SOC a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BRN or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) delivered a total return of +32. 6%, compared to -59. 3% for Barnwell Industries, Inc. (BRN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +32. 4% versus BRN's -27. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BRN or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Barnwell Industries, Inc.
(BRN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 30β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately -606% more volatile than BRN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BRN or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp.
grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -23. 2% for Barnwell Industries, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BRN or SOC?
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
(BRN) is the more profitable company, earning -50. 4% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps -50. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRN leads at -39. 1% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRN leads at 11. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BRN or SOC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BRN or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Barnwell Industries, Inc.
(BRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 30)). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRN: -27. 3%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BRN and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.