BRY vs BATL vs CIVI vs MTDR

For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Berry Corporation at 13. 0x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) delivered a total return of +111.

4%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRY returned +7279% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.

92β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning CIVI is approximately -155% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 68% for Civitas Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Battalion Oil Corporation grew EPS 42. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 9% for Berry Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

8% net margin versus 2. 5% for Berry Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTDR leads at 32. 5% versus -4. 0% for BATL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Battalion Oil Corporation — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRY: 114. 7% to $7. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 4% for Matador Resources Company (MTDR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.

92), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -71. 8%, CIVI: -86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BRY is a small-cap deep-value stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTDR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.