Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BRY vs TALO vs CIVI vs BATL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
BRY vs TALO vs CIVI vs BATL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $253M | $2.49B | $2.34B | $47M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $680M | $1.74B | $4.71B | $165M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-91M | $-743M | $638M | $12M |
| Gross Margin | 31.0% | 2.3% | 43.9% | 72.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | -24.9% | 31.1% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | — | 6.8x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $435M | $1.24B | $4.49B | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $363M | $76M | $28M |
BRY vs TALO vs CIVI vs BATL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Corporation (BRY) | 100 | 76.9 | -23.1% |
| Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 173.8 | +73.8% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 19.2 | -80.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRY vs TALO vs CIVI vs BATL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRY is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.3K% 10Y total return vs TALO's -59.0%
TALO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 57.3%, current ratio 1.30x
- Beta 0.06, current ratio 1.30x
- Beta 0.06 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
- Better valuation composite
- 13.6% margin vs TALO's -42.7%
BATL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -1.71, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BRY's 19.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +128.8% vs CIVI's +6.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs TALO's -42.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BRY's 19.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +128.8% vs CIVI's +6.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs TALO's -13.2%, ROIC 10.8% vs -2.3% |
BRY vs TALO vs CIVI vs BATL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BRY vs TALO vs CIVI vs BATL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BATL leads in 1 of 6 categories
BRY leads 0 • TALO leads 0 • CIVI leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TALO and CIVI and BATL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 28.5x BATL's $165M. CIVI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TALO's -42.7%. On growth, TALO holds the edge at -7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $680M | $1.7B | $4.7B | $165M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $222M | $437M | $3.4B | $74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$91M | -$743M | $638M | $12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | $489M | $934M | $39M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +2.3% | +43.9% | +72.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | -24.9% | +31.1% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | -42.7% | +13.6% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +28.1% | +19.8% | +23.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.5% | -7.9% | -8.1% | -37.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -137.4% | -29.4% | -33.9% | +59.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CIVI and BATL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 75% valuation discount to BRY's 13.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TALO's 3.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $253M | $2.5B | $2.3B | $47M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $673M | $3.4B | $6.8B | $42M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.04x | -5.29x | 3.24x | -1.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 6.75x | 12.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.07x | 3.13x | 1.89x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 1.40x | 0.45x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 1.20x | 0.41x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.35x | 5.48x | 2.61x | 1.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CIVI and BATL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BATL delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-33 for TALO. TALO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIVI's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATL scores 8/9 vs CIVI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.6% | -33.2% | +9.5% | +14.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.3% | -13.2% | +4.2% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | -2.3% | +10.8% | -3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | -2.0% | +12.1% | -1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.57x | 0.68x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $420M | $879M | $4.4B | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $363M | $76M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $435M | $1.2B | $4.5B | $23M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.14x | -2.36x | 2.80x | 0.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TALO and BATL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIVI five years ago would be worth $13,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,252 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, BATL leads with a +128.8% total return vs CIVI's +6.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TALO at 4.3% vs BATL's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +32.6% | -1.5% | +140.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.6% | +100.7% | +6.8% | +128.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.2% | +13.3% | -41.7% | -54.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.7% | +18.8% | +31.9% | -77.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +727900.0% | -59.0% | -86.2% | -72.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.9% | +4.3% | -16.5% | -23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TALO and BATL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVI's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TALO currently trades 87.7% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.06x | 1.10x | -1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.15 | $17.00 | $37.45 | $29.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.36 | $7.27 | $25.38 | $1.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +87.7% | +73.1% | +9.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 49.5 | 54.8 | 37.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 2.3M | 22.4M | 16.6M |
Analyst Outlook
BATL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BRY as "Hold", TALO as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", BATL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 114.7% upside for BRY (target: $7) vs -7.8% for TALO (target: $14). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs CIVI's 18.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $13.75 | $31.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 13 | 16 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +19.5% | — | +18.2% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.63 | — | $4.98 | $2.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +4.8% | +18.3% | 0.0% |
BATL leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Analyst Outlook. 5 categories are tied.
BRY vs TALO vs CIVI vs BATL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRY or TALO or CIVI or BATL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRY or TALO or CIVI or BATL?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Berry Corporation at 13. 0x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRY or TALO or CIVI or BATL?
Over the past 5 years, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) delivered a total return of +31. 9%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRY returned +7279% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRY or TALO or CIVI or BATL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
71β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CIVI is approximately -164% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 68% for Civitas Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRY or TALO or CIVI or BATL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Battalion Oil Corporation grew EPS 42. 6% year-over-year, compared to -555. 8% for Talos Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRY or TALO or CIVI or BATL?
Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -27. 9% for Talos Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus -5. 9% for TALO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRY or TALO or CIVI or BATL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Battalion Oil Corporation — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRY: 114. 7% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRY or TALO or CIVI or BATL?
In this comparison, BATL (100.
0% yield), BRY (19. 5% yield), CIVI (18. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TALO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BRY or TALO or CIVI or BATL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
71), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -72. 1%, CIVI: -86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRY and TALO and CIVI and BATL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BRY is a small-cap deep-value stock; TALO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock. BRY, CIVI, BATL pay a dividend while TALO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.