Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BSAC vs BSBR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BSAC vs BSBR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $14.38B | $43.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.66T | $151.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.05T | $12.69B |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | 26.7% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $15.88T | $129.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.24T | $201.98B |
BSAC vs BSBR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Banco Santander-Chi… (BSAC) | 100 | 193.6 | +93.6% |
| Banco Santander (Br… (BSBR) | 100 | 128.8 | +28.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSAC vs BSBR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 100.0%
- 125.2% 10Y total return vs BSBR's 103.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.21x
BSBR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 17.5%, EPS growth 87.4%
- NIM 4.5% vs BSAC's 2.9%
- 17.5% NII/revenue growth vs BSAC's -5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.5% NII/revenue growth vs BSAC's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 6.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BSAC's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs BSBR's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BSBR's 6.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.8% vs BSBR's +24.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BSAC's 0.2% |
BSAC vs BSBR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSAC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.66T annually — 30.8x BSBR's $151.5B. BSAC is the more profitable business, keeping 21.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSBR's 8.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.66T | $151.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.45T | $18.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.05T | $12.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $776.1B | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +27.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | -37.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BSAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, BSAC trades at a 100% valuation discount to BSBR's 17.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BSBR's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BSAC's 17.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.4B | $43.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26.3B | $28.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.03x | 17.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 6.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.04x | 7.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.77x | 1.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 0.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.64x | 160.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSBR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSAC delivers a 21.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $10 for BSBR. BSBR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BSAC's 2.77x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.5% | +10.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +3.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.77x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.64T | -$72.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.24T | $202.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.88T | $130.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BSAC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSAC five years ago would be worth $15,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,906 for BSBR. Over the past 12 months, BSAC leads with a +32.8% total return vs BSBR's +24.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSAC at 20.4% vs BSBR's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | -3.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.8% | +24.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.3% | +18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.5% | +9.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.2% | +103.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.4% | +5.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BSAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BSBR's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.72 | $7.32 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.77 | $4.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +79.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.3 | 48.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 453K | 968K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BSAC and BSBR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BSAC as "Hold" and BSBR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.2% upside for BSBR (target: $7) vs 9.7% for BSAC (target: $34). For income investors, BSAC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs BSBR's 5.95%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.50 | $7.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +6.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $484767.98 | $1.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BSAC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BSBR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BSAC vs BSBR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSAC or BSBR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Banco Santander (Brasil) S.
A. (BSBR) is the stronger pick with 17. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC). Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Banco Santander (Brasil) S. A. (BSBR) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSAC or BSBR?
On trailing P/E, Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) is the cheapest at 0.
0x versus Banco Santander (Brasil) S. A. at 17. 6x. On forward P/E, Banco Santander-Chile is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSAC or BSBR?
Over the past 5 years, Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) delivered a total return of +54.
5%, compared to +9. 1% for Banco Santander (Brasil) S. A. (BSBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSAC returned +125. 2% versus BSBR's +103. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSAC or BSBR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
94β versus Banco Santander (Brasil) S. A. 's 1. 11β — meaning BSBR is approximately 18% more volatile than BSAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banco Santander (Brasil) S. A. (BSBR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 103% versus 3% for Banco Santander-Chile — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSAC or BSBR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Banco Santander (Brasil) S.
A. (BSBR) is pulling ahead at 17. 5% versus -5. 0% for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banco Santander-Chile grew EPS 492. 6% year-over-year, compared to 87. 4% for Banco Santander (Brasil) S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSAC or BSBR?
Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
9% net margin versus 8. 4% for Banco Santander (Brasil) S. A. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSAC leads at 26. 7% versus 11. 0% for BSBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BSAC leads at 48. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSAC or BSBR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) trades at 0.
0x forward P/E versus 6. 5x for Banco Santander (Brasil) S. A. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSBR: 24. 2% to $7. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSAC or BSBR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 6. 0% for Banco Santander (Brasil) S. A. (BSBR).
09Is BSAC or BSBR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
94), 100. 0% yield, +125. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSAC: +125. 2%, BSBR: +103. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSAC and BSBR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BSAC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BSBR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.