Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BSET vs ETH vs FLXS vs HBB vs MHK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
BSET vs ETH vs FLXS vs HBB vs MHK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $123M | $554M | $295M | $276M | $6.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $331M | $615M | $458M | $595M | $10.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $47M | $22M | $28M | $414M |
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 60.5% | 23.2% | 26.8% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 10.1% | 6.1% | 6.6% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 8.5x | 11.9x | 12.8x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $89M | $124M | $59M | $42M | $2.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $76M | $40M | $47M | $856M |
BSET vs ETH vs FLXS vs HBB vs MHK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bassett Furniture I… (BSET) | 100 | 108.4 | +8.4% |
| Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH) | 100 | 70.7 | -29.3% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 145.3 | +45.3% |
| Hamilton Beach Bran… (HBB) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 63.8 | -36.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSET vs ETH vs FLXS vs HBB vs MHK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSET is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 5.6%
- Beta 0.35, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.89x
- Beta 0.35 vs ETH's 2.91
- 5.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HBB's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ETH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 11.2x)
- 8.4% margin vs BSET's 2.3%
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs ETH's -18.8%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs HBB's -7.3%
- +80.1% vs BSET's -13.3%
HBB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MHK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 2.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs HBB's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 11.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs BSET's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs ETH's 2.91 | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HBB's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.1% vs BSET's -13.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs BSET's 2.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs 2.6% |
BSET vs ETH vs FLXS vs HBB vs MHK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BSET vs ETH vs FLXS vs HBB vs MHK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ETH leads in 1 of 6 categories
HBB leads 1 • FLXS leads 1 • BSET leads 0 • MHK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MHK is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 33.2x BSET's $331M. ETH is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSET's 2.3%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $331M | $615M | $458M | $595M | $11.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $70M | $31M | $44M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $47M | $22M | $28M | $414M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $20M | $28M | $8M | $709M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.3% | +60.5% | +23.2% | +26.8% | +24.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +10.1% | +6.1% | +6.6% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +8.4% | +4.8% | +4.7% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +0.0% | +6.1% | +1.4% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | — | +9.8% | -8.6% | +8.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +117.8% | -28.1% | -27.2% | +100.0% | +65.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BSET and HBB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, HBB trades at a 48% valuation discount to BSET's 20.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HBB's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BSET's 21.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $123M | $554M | $295M | $276M | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $171M | $602M | $314M | $270M | $8.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.36x | 10.84x | 15.54x | 10.53x | 17.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.27x | 8.55x | 11.90x | 12.84x | 11.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.25x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.80x | 9.71x | 10.38x | 6.37x | 7.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.90x | 0.67x | 0.45x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 1.16x | 1.87x | 1.51x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.76x | 9999.00x | 8.74x | 24.99x | 10.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HBB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBB delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $5 for BSET. HBB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BSET's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs ETH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +10.0% | +12.2% | +16.2% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +6.4% | +7.5% | +7.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +7.6% | +9.9% | +14.0% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +10.5% | +12.3% | +13.7% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.26x | 0.35x | 0.23x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | $47M | $19M | -$5M | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $76M | $40M | $47M | $856M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $89M | $124M | $59M | $42M | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 74.23x | 721.00x | 380.21x | 55.74x | 36.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,472 for MHK. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs BSET's -13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs ETH's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.9% | -26.1% | +38.7% | +29.1% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.3% | +28.9% | +80.1% | +50.9% | +1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.8% | -33.4% | +242.4% | +114.9% | +2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.6% | -30.3% | +19.5% | +1.6% | -55.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.8% | -18.8% | +51.4% | -22.6% | -47.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.7% | -12.7% | +50.7% | +29.0% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BSET and HBB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSET is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBB currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs ETH's 47.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 2.91x | 1.51x | 1.95x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.75 | $45.78 | $59.95 | $21.80 | $143.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.17 | $16.85 | $29.38 | $12.72 | $93.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.2% | +47.6% | +92.0% | +94.2% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.7 | 55.8 | 60.4 | 54.4 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 4.6M | 47K | 25K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BSET and HBB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSET as "Hold", ETH as "Hold", HBB as "Hold", MHK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for MHK (target: $130) vs -2.1% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, BSET offers the higher dividend yield at 5.59% vs FLXS's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $54.00 | — | $130.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 10 | — | 1 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.6% | +0.0% | +1.1% | +2.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $0.00 | $0.63 | $0.48 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +3.3% | +2.4% |
ETH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HBB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
BSET vs ETH vs FLXS vs HBB vs MHK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSET or ETH or FLXS or HBB or MHK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSET or ETH or FLXS or HBB or MHK?
On trailing P/E, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) is the cheapest at 10.
5x versus Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSET or ETH or FLXS or HBB or MHK?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -55. 3% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +51. 4% versus MHK's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSET or ETH or FLXS or HBB or MHK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust's 2. 91β — meaning ETH is approximately 739% more volatile than BSET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 54% for Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSET or ETH or FLXS or HBB or MHK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -7. 3% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated grew EPS 163. 1% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HBB leads at -1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSET or ETH or FLXS or HBB or MHK?
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
4% net margin versus 1. 8% for Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETH leads at 10. 1% versus 2. 3% for BSET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETH leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSET or ETH or FLXS or HBB or MHK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8.
5x forward P/E versus 17. 3x for Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MHK: 26. 5% to $130. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSET or ETH or FLXS or HBB or MHK?
In this comparison, BSET (5.
6% yield), HBB (2. 3% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ETH, MHK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BSET or ETH or FLXS or HBB or MHK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), 5. 6% yield). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSET: -22. 8%, ETH: -18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSET and ETH and FLXS and HBB and MHK?
These companies operate in different sectors (BSET (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and HBB (Consumer Cyclical) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BSET is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; HBB is a small-cap deep-value stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock. BSET, FLXS, HBB pay a dividend while ETH, MHK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.