Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN vs RUN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Renewable Utilities
Solar
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN vs RUN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Renewable Utilities | Solar |
| Market Cap | $36K | $62.75B | $4.34B | $7.84B | $3.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $2.45B | $710M | $1.49B | $3.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $6M | $-1.63B | $2M | $568M |
| Gross Margin | -6.8% | 31.1% | 99.8% | 36.6% | 23.5% |
| Operating Margin | -30.3% | 8.2% | 38.1% | 12.7% | -1.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 123.5x | — | 26.9x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $2.99B | $997M | $10.20B | $14.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $2.45B | $1M | $818M | $1.24B |
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN vs RUN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bolt Projects Holdi… (BSLK) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 1927.8 | +1827.8% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 126.3 | +26.3% |
| Clearway Energy, In… (CWEN) | 100 | 143.0 | +43.0% |
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 83.3 | -16.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN vs RUN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSLK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 9.4% 10Y total return vs CWEN's 237.5%
- +14.1% vs BSLK's -99.3%
Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CWEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 7.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 1.13x
- Beta 0.55, yield 7.9%, current ratio 1.13x
- Beta 0.55 vs BE's 3.62, lower leverage
RUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 45.1% revenue growth vs BSLK's -60.1%
- Better valuation composite
- 17.9% margin vs BSLK's -47.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.1% revenue growth vs BSLK's -60.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs BSLK's -47.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs BE's 3.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.1% vs BSLK's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs BSLK's -218.1% |
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN vs RUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN vs RUN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CWEN leads in 3 of 6 categories
RUN leads 1 • BE leads 1 • BSLK leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BE and PLUG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 2312.4x BSLK's $1M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSLK's -47.6%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $2.4B | $710M | $1.5B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | $240M | -$1.5B | $1.0B | $541M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $6M | -$1.6B | $2M | $568M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $233M | -$2M | $189M | -$751M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +31.1% | +99.8% | +36.6% | +23.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -30.3% | +8.2% | +38.1% | +12.7% | -1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -47.6% | +0.2% | -2.3% | +0.1% | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.8% | +9.5% | -0.3% | +12.7% | -23.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +130.4% | +17.6% | +18.8% | +43.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -142.1% | +3.3% | +95.9% | -46.0% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CWEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 68% valuation discount to CWEN's 26.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CWEN's 16.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 513.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35,520 | $62.8B | $4.3B | $7.8B | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $63.3B | $5.3B | $17.2B | $17.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -705.49x | — | 26.87x | 8.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 123.47x | — | — | 15.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.59x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 513.03x | — | 16.23x | 24.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 31.00x | 6.12x | 5.49x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 79.14x | — | 0.77x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1097.28x | — | 21.25x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. CWEN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.72x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RUN scores 6/9 vs CWEN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +0.8% | -124.4% | +0.0% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +0.2% | -64.3% | +0.0% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.1% | +10.9% | +0.9% | -0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.0% | +2.5% | +18.6% | +1.2% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.77x | 19.75x | 1.72x | 2.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | $538M | $996M | $9.4B | $13.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $2.5B | $1M | $818M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $3.0B | $997M | $10.2B | $14.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.88x | 1.05x | -36.18x | 0.55x | -0.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $129,930 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for BSLK. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1414.1% total return vs BSLK's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.8% vs BSLK's -94.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -92.3% | +164.5% | +39.9% | +13.7% | -24.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.3% | +1414.1% | +266.9% | +39.0% | +71.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1440.0% | -66.4% | +43.6% | -15.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1199.3% | -84.5% | +78.0% | -64.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +944.1% | +61.7% | +237.5% | +97.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -94.1% | +148.8% | -30.5% | +12.8% | -5.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CWEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWEN currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs BSLK's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.97x | 3.62x | 2.55x | 0.55x | 2.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.55 | $302.99 | $4.58 | $41.54 | $22.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.04 | $16.47 | $0.69 | $27.67 | $5.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +86.2% | +68.1% | +91.9% | +65.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.1 | 60.3 | 56.2 | 44.4 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 10.2M | 75.2M | 829K | 10.3M |
Analyst Outlook
CWEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BE as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", CWEN as "Buy", RUN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for PLUG (target: $4) vs -28.1% for BE (target: $188). CWEN is the only dividend payer here at 7.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $187.56 | $3.91 | $43.67 | $18.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 | 38 | 16 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +7.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | — | $3.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CWEN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). RUN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BSLK vs BE vs PLUG vs CWEN vs RUN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN or RUN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN or RUN?
On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Clearway Energy, Inc. at 26. 9x. On forward P/E, Sunrun Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN or RUN?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1199%, compared to -100.
0% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +944. 1% versus BSLK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN or RUN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 62β — meaning BE is approximately 553% more volatile than CWEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 172% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN or RUN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN or RUN?
Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -47. 6% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -30. 3% for BSLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN or RUN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 123. 5x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 108. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLUG: 25. 3% to $3. 91.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN or RUN?
In this comparison, CWEN (7.
9% yield) pays a dividend. BSLK, BE, PLUG, RUN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BSLK or BE or PLUG or CWEN or RUN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clearway Energy, Inc.
(CWEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 7. 9% yield, +237. 5% 10Y return). Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK) carries a higher beta of 1. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWEN: +237. 5%, BSLK: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSLK and BE and PLUG and CWEN and RUN?
These companies operate in different sectors (BSLK (Financial Services) and BE (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials) and CWEN (Utilities) and RUN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BSLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock. CWEN pays a dividend while BSLK, BE, PLUG, RUN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.