Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BSM vs NRP vs VNOM vs ARLP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Coal
Oil & Gas Midstream
Coal
BSM vs NRP vs VNOM vs ARLP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Coal | Oil & Gas Midstream | Coal |
| Market Cap | $2.83B | $1.50B | $17.62B | $3.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $468M | $185M | $1.60B | $2.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $297M | $95M | $-46M | $246M |
| Gross Margin | 78.0% | 69.9% | 46.3% | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 76.6% | 67.0% | 43.1% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.7x | 23.9x | 20.7x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $154M | $33M | $2.19B | $480M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $30M | $13M | $71M |
BSM vs NRP vs VNOM vs ARLP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Black Stone Mineral… (BSM) | 100 | 210.6 | +110.6% |
| Natural Resource Pa… (NRP) | 100 | 779.5 | +679.5% |
| Viper Energy, Inc. (VNOM) | 100 | 447.9 | +347.9% |
| Alliance Resource P… (ARLP) | 100 | 806.0 | +706.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSM vs NRP vs VNOM vs ARLP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 10.1%
- 63.5% margin vs VNOM's -2.9%
- 30.7% ROA vs VNOM's -0.4%, ROIC 16.1% vs 5.0%
NRP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 9.7% 10Y total return vs VNOM's 245.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 1.85x
- Beta 0.01 vs VNOM's 0.38, lower leverage
VNOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 56.6%, EPS growth -112.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.8%
- 56.6% revenue growth vs NRP's -17.4%
- +25.0% vs ARLP's +3.9%
ARLP is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.07, yield 10.3%, current ratio 2.10x
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 20.7x)
- 10.3% yield, vs BSM's 10.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.6% revenue growth vs NRP's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 20.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 63.5% margin vs VNOM's -2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs VNOM's 0.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, vs BSM's 10.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.0% vs ARLP's +3.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 30.7% ROA vs VNOM's -0.4%, ROIC 16.1% vs 5.0% |
BSM vs NRP vs VNOM vs ARLP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BSM vs NRP vs VNOM vs ARLP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARLP leads in 2 of 6 categories
BSM leads 1 • NRP leads 1 • VNOM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARLP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 11.8x NRP's $185M. BSM is the more profitable business, keeping 63.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNOM's -2.9%. On growth, VNOM holds the edge at +102.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $468M | $185M | $1.6B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $398M | $142M | $1.4B | $626M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $297M | $95M | -$46M | $246M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $161M | $164M | -$4.4B | $339M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.0% | +69.9% | +46.3% | +23.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +76.6% | +67.0% | +43.1% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +63.5% | +51.6% | -2.9% | +11.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | +89.1% | -2.8% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.5% | -29.3% | +102.4% | -4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.5% | -100.0% | -14.5% | -87.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ARLP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, BSM trades at a 7% valuation discount to NRP's 11.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARLP's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VNOM's 16.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $1.5B | $17.6B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $1.5B | $19.8B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.43x | 11.26x | -97.88x | 10.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.67x | 23.94x | 20.74x | 11.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.49x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.99x | 9.72x | 16.69x | 5.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.71x | 7.40x | 13.09x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.51x | 2.37x | 0.65x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.50x | 9.03x | — | 8.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BSM and NRP each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSM delivers a 35.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-0 for VNOM. NRP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARLP's 0.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSM scores 5/9 vs VNOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.5% | +15.4% | -0.5% | +13.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +30.7% | +12.6% | -0.4% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | +16.1% | +5.0% | +12.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.9% | +19.1% | +6.6% | +14.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.05x | 0.21x | 0.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $153M | $3M | $2.2B | $409M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $30M | $13M | $71M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $154M | $33M | $2.2B | $480M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 40.14x | 23.35x | 2.67x | 7.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NRP five years ago would be worth $73,134 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,469 for BSM. Over the past 12 months, VNOM leads with a +25.0% total return vs ARLP's +3.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRP at 36.3% vs BSM's 4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.0% | +9.5% | +22.5% | +12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.3% | +17.8% | +25.0% | +3.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.4% | +153.3% | +98.1% | +72.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.7% | +631.3% | +203.1% | +519.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.6% | +971.6% | +245.5% | +195.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.6% | +36.3% | +25.6% | +19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NRP and VNOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NRP is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNOM's 0.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VNOM currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs BSM's 86.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.01x | 0.38x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.49 | $128.60 | $51.13 | $29.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.78 | $91.79 | $35.10 | $22.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +87.9% | +91.9% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.2 | 39.9 | 50.6 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 437K | 33K | 2.9M | 380K |
Analyst Outlook
ARLP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSM as "Buy", NRP as "Hold", VNOM as "Buy", ARLP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 29.8% upside for BSM (target: $17) vs 15.4% for VNOM (target: $54). For income investors, ARLP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.28% vs NRP's 3.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.33 | — | $54.20 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 10 | 42 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.1% | +3.8% | +4.9% | +10.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.35 | $4.25 | $2.30 | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% |
ARLP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). BSM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
BSM vs NRP vs VNOM vs ARLP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSM or NRP or VNOM or ARLP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Viper Energy, Inc.
(VNOM) is the stronger pick with 56. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for Natural Resource Partners L. P. (NRP). Black Stone Minerals, L. P. (BSM) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (14. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Black Stone Minerals, L. P. (BSM) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSM or NRP or VNOM or ARLP?
On trailing P/E, Black Stone Minerals, L.
P. (BSM) is the cheapest at 10. 4x versus Natural Resource Partners L. P. at 11. 3x. On forward P/E, Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSM or NRP or VNOM or ARLP?
Over the past 5 years, Natural Resource Partners L.
P. (NRP) delivered a total return of +631. 3%, compared to +94. 7% for Black Stone Minerals, L. P. (BSM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NRP returned +971. 6% versus BSM's +60. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSM or NRP or VNOM or ARLP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Natural Resource Partners L.
P. (NRP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Viper Energy, Inc. 's 0. 38β — meaning VNOM is approximately 4007% more volatile than NRP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Natural Resource Partners L. P. (NRP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 26% for Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSM or NRP or VNOM or ARLP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Viper Energy, Inc.
(VNOM) is pulling ahead at 56. 6% versus -17. 4% for Natural Resource Partners L. P. (NRP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Black Stone Minerals, L. P. grew EPS 11. 3% year-over-year, compared to -112. 6% for Viper Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VNOM leads at 15. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSM or NRP or VNOM or ARLP?
Black Stone Minerals, L.
P. (BSM) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 0% net margin versus -5. 1% for Viper Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRP leads at 68. 9% versus 17. 6% for ARLP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRP leads at 81. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSM or NRP or VNOM or ARLP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alliance Resource Partners, L.
P. (ARLP) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 23. 9x for Natural Resource Partners L. P. — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSM: 29. 8% to $17. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSM or NRP or VNOM or ARLP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP) offers the highest yield at 10. 3%, versus 3. 8% for Natural Resource Partners L. P. (NRP).
09Is BSM or NRP or VNOM or ARLP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Natural Resource Partners L.
P. (NRP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 3. 8% yield, +971. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NRP: +971. 6%, VNOM: +245. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSM and NRP and VNOM and ARLP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NRP is a small-cap deep-value stock; VNOM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ARLP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.