Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BTBD vs KRUS vs TXRH vs CAKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
BTBD vs KRUS vs TXRH vs CAKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $11M | $671M | $10.41B | $3.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $292M | $6.06B | $3.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-936K | $-4M | $415M | $148M |
| Gross Margin | 22.2% | 11.0% | 18.7% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | -2.4% | 8.2% | 5.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 28.1x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $170M | $1.89B | $3.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $47M | $135M | $216M |
BTBD vs KRUS vs TXRH vs CAKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
| Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS) | 100 | 90.1 | -9.9% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 213.9 | +113.9% |
| The Cheesecake Fact… (CAKE) | 100 | 160.9 | +60.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BTBD vs KRUS vs TXRH vs CAKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BTBD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +49.2% vs KRUS's -6.9%
KRUS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.9%, EPS growth 79.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.1%
- 18.9% revenue growth vs CAKE's 4.7%
TXRH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 1.7%
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs KRUS's 187.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, current ratio 0.50x
- 6.8% margin vs BTBD's -6.7%
CAKE is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.11, yield 1.8%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 28.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.9% revenue growth vs CAKE's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 28.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs BTBD's -6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs BTBD's 2.01 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CAKE's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.2% vs KRUS's -6.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs BTBD's -7.8%, ROIC 14.5% vs -15.9% |
BTBD vs KRUS vs TXRH vs CAKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BTBD vs KRUS vs TXRH vs CAKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXRH leads in 2 of 6 categories
BTBD leads 0 • KRUS leads 0 • CAKE leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 431.9x BTBD's $14M. TXRH is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BTBD's -6.7%. On growth, KRUS holds the edge at +14.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $292M | $6.1B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $151,370 | $8M | $709M | $296M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$935,920 | -$4M | $415M | $148M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$585,396 | -$28M | $441M | $155M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +11.0% | +18.7% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -2.4% | +8.2% | +5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -1.4% | +6.8% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | -9.5% | +7.3% | +4.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.4% | +14.0% | +12.8% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.2% | -196.9% | +10.0% | -28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BTBD and CAKE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.8x trailing earnings, CAKE trades at a 24% valuation discount to TXRH's 25.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TXRH's 17.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRUS's 85.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $671M | $10.4B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $793M | $12.2B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.76x | -351.88x | 25.89x | 19.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 28.11x | 15.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 85.45x | 17.15x | 21.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 2.37x | 1.77x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.57x | 2.90x | 7.09x | 6.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 30.44x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH delivers a 37.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-12 for BTBD. BTBD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAKE's 7.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAKE scores 6/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.1% | -1.7% | +37.4% | +37.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.8% | -0.9% | +12.2% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.9% | -1.2% | +14.5% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.5% | -1.4% | +20.1% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.74x | 1.27x | 7.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $123M | $1.8B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $47M | $135M | $216M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $170M | $1.9B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.91x | -50.08x | — | 16.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BTBD and TXRH and CAKE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $16,160 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,868 for BTBD. Over the past 12 months, BTBD leads with a +49.2% total return vs KRUS's -6.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAKE at 24.3% vs BTBD's -15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.4% | +3.8% | -7.4% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.2% | -6.9% | -6.2% | +23.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.7% | -12.2% | +53.6% | +92.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.3% | +57.8% | +61.6% | +2.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.3% | +187.1% | +288.0% | +35.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.5% | -4.2% | +15.4% | +24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TXRH and CAKE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXRH is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBD's 2.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAKE currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs BTBD's 31.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.87x | 1.37x | 0.75x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.60 | $95.98 | $199.99 | $69.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $42.62 | $153.82 | $43.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.4% | +58.7% | +79.0% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.9 | 43.5 | 45.7 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 308K | 983K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TXRH and CAKE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KRUS as "Buy", TXRH as "Hold", CAKE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 30.4% upside for KRUS (target: $73) vs 7.7% for CAKE (target: $66). For income investors, CAKE offers the higher dividend yield at 1.78% vs TXRH's 1.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $73.40 | $188.36 | $65.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 43 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.71 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +5.1% |
TXRH leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
BTBD vs KRUS vs TXRH vs CAKE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BTBD or KRUS or TXRH or CAKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kura Sushi USA, Inc.
(KRUS) is the stronger pick with 18. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE). The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) offers the better valuation at 19. 8x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BTBD or KRUS or TXRH or CAKE?
On trailing P/E, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the cheapest at 19.
8x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. at 25. 9x. On forward P/E, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated is actually cheaper at 15. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BTBD or KRUS or TXRH or CAKE?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to -61. 3% for BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +331. 7% versus BTBD's -74. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BTBD or KRUS or TXRH or CAKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus BT Brands, Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning BTBD is approximately 149% more volatile than TXRH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 58% versus 8% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BTBD or KRUS or TXRH or CAKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kura Sushi USA, Inc.
(KRUS) is pulling ahead at 18. 9% versus 4. 7% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kura Sushi USA, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to -164. 3% for BT Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRUS leads at 26. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BTBD or KRUS or TXRH or CAKE?
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -15. 6% for BT Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXRH leads at 8. 6% versus -12. 4% for BTBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAKE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BTBD or KRUS or TXRH or CAKE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) trades at 15.
2x forward P/E versus 28. 1x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — 12. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRUS: 30. 4% to $73. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — BTBD or KRUS or TXRH or CAKE?
In this comparison, CAKE (1.
8% yield), TXRH (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. BTBD, KRUS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BTBD or KRUS or TXRH or CAKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 7% yield, +331. 7% 10Y return). BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +331. 7%, BTBD: -74. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BTBD and KRUS and TXRH and CAKE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BTBD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRUS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CAKE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TXRH, CAKE pay a dividend while BTBD, KRUS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.