Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BTSG vs ACHC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
BTSG vs ACHC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $10.23B | $2.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.65B | $3.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $310M | $-1.11B |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 56.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | 11.7% |
| Forward P/E | 34.0x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.84B | $2.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $88M | $133M |
BTSG vs ACHC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrightSpring Health… (BTSG) | 100 | 480.4 | +380.4% |
| Acadia Healthcare C… (ACHC) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BTSG vs ACHC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BTSG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 10.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.7%
- 381.3% 10Y total return vs ACHC's -58.5%
- 14.6% revenue growth vs ACHC's 5.0%
ACHC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.84
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, current ratio 1.55x
- Beta 0.84, current ratio 1.55x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% revenue growth vs ACHC's 5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 34.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.3% margin vs ACHC's -32.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs BTSG's 1.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.8% vs ACHC's +1.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs ACHC's -18.6%, ROIC 6.7% vs 5.9% |
BTSG vs ACHC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BTSG vs ACHC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTSG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTSG is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.6B annually — 4.0x ACHC's $3.4B. BTSG is the more profitable business, keeping 2.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHC's -32.8%. On growth, BTSG holds the edge at +25.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.6B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $572M | $588M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $310M | -$1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $508M | -$215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +56.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | -32.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.6% | +7.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +142.9% | -49.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACHC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACHC's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTSG's 22.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.2B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.0B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 60.85x | -2.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.00x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.25x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.68x | 8.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.79x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.17x | 1.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.91x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTSG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTSG delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-41 for ACHC. ACHC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BTSG's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTSG scores 7/9 vs ACHC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.7% | -40.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | -18.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.51x | 1.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $88M | $133M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.13x | -5.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BTSG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BTSG five years ago would be worth $48,127 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,823 for ACHC. Over the past 12 months, BTSG leads with a +129.8% total return vs ACHC's +1.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTSG at 68.8% vs ACHC's -29.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.9% | +71.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +129.8% | +1.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +381.3% | -64.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +381.3% | -61.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +381.3% | -58.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +68.8% | -29.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BTSG and ACHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTSG's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTSG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs ACHC's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $54.68 | $30.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.01 | $11.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.9 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BTSG as "Buy" and ACHC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -3.9% upside for ACHC (target: $24) vs -7.9% for BTSG (target: $49).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.75 | $23.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +2.2% |
BTSG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACHC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BTSG vs ACHC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BTSG or ACHC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
Common Stock (BTSG) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC). BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock (BTSG) offers the better valuation at 60. 9x trailing P/E (34. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock (BTSG) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BTSG or ACHC?
On forward P/E, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BTSG or ACHC?
Over the past 5 years, BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
Common Stock (BTSG) delivered a total return of +381. 3%, compared to -61. 8% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTSG returned +381. 3% versus ACHC's -58. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BTSG or ACHC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
(ACHC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock's 1. 46β — meaning BTSG is approximately 74% more volatile than ACHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 124% versus 151% for BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BTSG or ACHC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
Common Stock (BTSG) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus 5. 0% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 1029% year-over-year, compared to -537. 4% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BTSG leads at 18. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BTSG or ACHC?
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
Common Stock (BTSG) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -33. 3% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACHC leads at 11. 7% versus 3. 2% for BTSG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACHC leads at 17. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BTSG or ACHC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
(ACHC) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 34. 0x for BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock — 17. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACHC: -3. 9% to $23. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BTSG or ACHC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BTSG or ACHC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
(ACHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACHC: -58. 5%, BTSG: +381. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BTSG and ACHC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.