Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BURU vs IPGP vs NPKI vs MKSI vs TER

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BURU
Nuburu, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-89.8%
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.31B
5Y Perf.+30.2%
NPKI
NPK International Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.30B
5Y Perf.+84.6%
MKSI
MKS Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+164.7%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$55.44B
5Y Perf.+221.9%

BURU vs IPGP vs NPKI vs MKSI vs TER — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BURU logoBURU
IPGP logoIPGP
NPKI logoNPKI
MKSI logoMKSI
TER logoTER
IndustryIndustrial - MachinerySemiconductorsOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductors
Market Cap$1M$4.31B$1.30B$20.25B$55.44B
Revenue (TTM)$109K$1.04B$287M$4.07B$3.79B
Net Income (TTM)$-63M$29M$36M$327M$854M
Gross Margin-392.0%37.6%35.2%45.2%58.8%
Operating Margin-116.1%0.3%11.4%14.8%26.9%
Forward P/E62.6x29.3x30.4x49.1x
Total Debt$9M$0.00$37M$4.69B$347M
Cash & Equiv.$209K$404M$5M$675M$294M

BURU vs IPGP vs NPKI vs MKSI vs TERLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BURU
IPGP
NPKI
MKSI
TER
StockNov 24May 26Return
Nuburu, Inc. (BURU)10010.2-89.8%
IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP)100130.2+30.2%
NPK International I… (NPKI)100184.6+84.6%
MKS Inc. (MKSI)100264.7+164.7%
Teradyne, Inc. (TER)100321.9+221.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BURU vs IPGP vs NPKI vs MKSI vs TER

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TER leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. NPK International Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. BURU and MKSI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BURU
Nuburu, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

BURU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 1.21 vs MKSI's 2.64
Best for: stability
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IPGP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
NPKI
NPK International Inc.
The Growth Play

NPKI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth 124.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.47, Low D/E 10.4%, current ratio 1.43x
  • 27.4% revenue growth vs BURU's -92.7%
  • Lower P/E (29.3x vs 49.1x)
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 2.64, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.71x
  • 0.3% yield, vs TER's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: defensive
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
The Income Pick

TER carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 2.60, yield 0.1%
  • 18.0% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
  • 22.6% margin vs BURU's -578.5%
  • +372.2% vs BURU's -65.9%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNPKI logoNPKI27.4% revenue growth vs BURU's -92.7%
ValueNPKI logoNPKILower P/E (29.3x vs 49.1x)
Quality / MarginsTER logoTER22.6% margin vs BURU's -578.5%
Stability / SafetyBURU logoBURUBeta 1.21 vs MKSI's 2.64
DividendsMKSI logoMKSI0.3% yield, vs TER's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TER logoTER+372.2% vs BURU's -65.9%
Efficiency (ROA)TER logoTER20.9% ROA vs BURU's -479.1%

BURU vs IPGP vs NPKI vs MKSI vs TER — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BURUNuburu, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IPGPIPG Photonics Corporation
FY 2025
High Power Continuous Wave CW Lasers
41.8%$309M
Laser And Non-Laser Systems
19.9%$147M
Pulsed Lasers
19.4%$143M
Medium And Low Power CW Lasers
11.9%$88M
Quasi-Continuous Wave QCW Lasers
7.0%$52M
NPKINPK International Inc.
FY 2025
Rental and Service
66.3%$184M
Product
33.7%$93M
MKSIMKS Inc.
FY 2025
Product
87.4%$3.4B
Service
12.6%$495M
TERTeradyne, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
83.4%$2.7B
Service
16.6%$530M

BURU vs IPGP vs NPKI vs MKSI vs TER — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTERLAGGINGMKSI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TER leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 37388.0x BURU's $108,912. TER is the more profitable business, keeping 22.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BURU's -578.5%. On growth, TER holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$108,912$1.0B$287M$4.1B$3.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$39M$55M$53M$945M$1.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$63M$29M$36M$327M$854M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M$8M$32M$401M$553M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-3.9%+37.6%+35.2%+45.2%+58.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-116.1%+0.3%+11.4%+14.8%+26.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-578.5%+2.8%+12.4%+8.0%+22.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-69.8%+0.8%+11.1%+9.8%+14.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.6%+15.9%+15.2%+87.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+82.1%-54.4%0.0%+53.2%+3.1%
TER leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — IPGP and NPKI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 36.8x trailing earnings, NPKI trades at a 74% valuation discount to IPGP's 139.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NPKI's 18.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TER's 67.7x.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1M$4.3B$1.3B$20.2B$55.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11M$3.9B$1.3B$24.3B$55.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.04x139.22x36.75x68.83x101.76x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.62.62x29.34x30.36x49.12x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple48.90x18.49x26.70x67.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.14x4.30x4.71x5.15x17.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.04x3.77x7.49x19.97x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF49.58x40.74x123.09x
Evenly matched — IPGP and NPKI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TER delivers a 29.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $1 for IPGP. NPKI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NPKI scores 7/9 vs BURU's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.4%+10.3%+12.2%+29.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.8%+1.2%+8.5%+3.7%+20.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.6%+9.9%+6.5%+19.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.6%+12.7%+7.2%+22.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–916766
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x1.73x0.12x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9M-$404M$31M$4.0B$53M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$209,337$404M$5M$675M$294M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$0$37M$4.7B$347M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.34x77.08x2.84x69.13x
TER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TER leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TER five years ago would be worth $27,805 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for BURU. Over the past 12 months, TER leads with a +372.2% total return vs BURU's -65.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TER at 57.3% vs BURU's -89.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-76.1%+35.8%+27.6%+78.8%+70.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-65.9%+75.6%+94.9%+306.1%+372.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-12.7%+91.5%+266.0%+288.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-48.5%+91.5%+66.5%+178.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+20.2%+91.5%+750.6%+1802.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.2%-4.4%+24.2%+54.1%+57.3%
TER leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BURU and NPKI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BURU is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MKSI's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NPKI currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs BURU's 5.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.21x1.80x1.47x2.64x2.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.24$155.82$16.50$326.83$422.11
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.15$53.98$7.63$71.49$73.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+5.6%+65.2%+93.5%+92.0%+83.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.739.756.665.357.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded41.8M510K795K1.2M3.4M
Evenly matched — BURU and NPKI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MKSI and TER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: IPGP as "Buy", NPKI as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", TER as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for IPGP (target: $152) vs -9.3% for MKSI (target: $273). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs TER's 0.14%.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…NPKI logoNPKINPK International…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.TER logoTERTeradyne, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$151.67$272.86$351.09
# AnalystsCovering analysts2732931
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1004
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.87$0.48
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.3%+1.7%+0.2%+1.3%
Evenly matched — MKSI and TER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TER leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallTeradyne, Inc. (TER)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BURU vs IPGP vs NPKI vs MKSI vs TER: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BURU or IPGP or NPKI or MKSI or TER a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is the stronger pick with 27. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -92. 7% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). NPK International Inc. (NPKI) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (29. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BURU or IPGP or NPKI or MKSI or TER?

On trailing P/E, NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus IPG Photonics Corporation at 139. 2x. On forward P/E, NPK International Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BURU or IPGP or NPKI or MKSI or TER?

Over the past 5 years, Teradyne, Inc.

(TER) delivered a total return of +178. 1%, compared to -99. 9% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TER returned +1803% versus BURU's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BURU or IPGP or NPKI or MKSI or TER?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuburu, Inc.

(BURU) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus MKS Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning MKSI is approximately 118% more volatile than BURU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NPK International Inc. (NPKI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BURU or IPGP or NPKI or MKSI or TER?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) is pulling ahead at 27. 4% versus -92. 7% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NPK International Inc. grew EPS 124. 0% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for Teradyne, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NPKI leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BURU or IPGP or NPKI or MKSI or TER?

Teradyne, Inc.

(TER) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus -226. 9% for Nuburu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TER leads at 21. 7% versus -86. 4% for BURU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TER leads at 58. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BURU or IPGP or NPKI or MKSI or TER more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, NPK International Inc.

(NPKI) trades at 29. 3x forward P/E versus 62. 6x for IPG Photonics Corporation — 33. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPGP: 49. 2% to $151. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BURU or IPGP or NPKI or MKSI or TER?

In this comparison, MKSI (0.

3% yield), TER (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BURU, IPGP, NPKI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BURU or IPGP or NPKI or MKSI or TER better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Teradyne, Inc.

(TER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1803% 10Y return). IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TER: +1803%, IPGP: +20. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BURU and IPGP and NPKI and MKSI and TER?

These companies operate in different sectors (BURU (Industrials) and IPGP (Technology) and NPKI (Energy) and MKSI (Technology) and TER (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BURU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NPKI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TER is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BURU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IPGP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NPKI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MKSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TER

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 43%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BURU and IPGP and NPKI and MKSI and TER on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BURU: -92.7% · IPGP: 16.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.