Other Precious Metals
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BVN vs AG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Silver
BVN vs AG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Silver |
| Market Cap | $8.62B | $10.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.74B | $1.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $785M | $174M |
| Gross Margin | 48.6% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | 35.7% | 29.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.4x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $710M | $314M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $530M | $792M |
BVN vs AG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compañía de Minas B… (BVN) | 100 | 432.1 | +332.1% |
| First Majestic Silv… (AG) | 100 | 213.5 | +113.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BVN vs AG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 1.3%
- 288.8% 10Y total return vs AG's 128.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 16.6%, current ratio 2.01x
AG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 128.2%, EPS growth 202.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.8%
- 128.2% revenue growth vs BVN's 50.9%
- +241.7% vs BVN's +132.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 128.2% revenue growth vs BVN's 50.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.2% margin vs AG's 13.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs AG's 1.56 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AG's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +241.7% vs BVN's +132.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.1% ROA vs AG's 4.1%, ROIC 11.4% vs 13.1% |
BVN vs AG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BVN vs AG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BVN and AG operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $1.3B in trailing revenue. BVN is the more profitable business, keeping 45.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AG's 13.7%. On growth, AG holds the edge at +171.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $760M | $636M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $785M | $174M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $105M | $351M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.6% | +35.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | +29.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +109.3% | +171.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.7% | +4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BVN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, BVN trades at a 82% valuation discount to AG's 61.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BVN's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AG's 15.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.6B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.8B | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.94x | 61.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.38x | 20.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.45x | 15.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.94x | 8.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.02x | 3.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 82.08x | 30.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AG leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BVN delivers a 20.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $6 for AG. AG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BVN's 0.17x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.2% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.1% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | +13.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $180M | -$478M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $530M | $792M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $710M | $314M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.72x | 20.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BVN five years ago would be worth $34,291 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,105 for AG. Over the past 12 months, AG leads with a +241.7% total return vs BVN's +132.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BVN at 70.7% vs AG's 46.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.0% | +33.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +132.8% | +241.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +397.6% | +212.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +242.9% | +31.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +288.8% | +128.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +70.7% | +46.3% |
Risk & Volatility
BVN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AG's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BVN currently trades 75.9% from its 52-week high vs AG's 66.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.67 | $32.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.00 | $5.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.9% | +66.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 16.9M |
Analyst Outlook
BVN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BVN as "Buy" and AG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.2% upside for BVN (target: $44) vs 24.0% for AG (target: $27). BVN is the only dividend payer here at 1.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.50 | $26.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
BVN leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
BVN vs AG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BVN or AG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Majestic Silver Corp.
(AG) is the stronger pick with 128. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 50. 9% for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. (BVN). Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. (BVN) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. (BVN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BVN or AG?
On trailing P/E, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.
A. A. (BVN) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. at 61. 1x. On forward P/E, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BVN or AG?
Over the past 5 years, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.
A. A. (BVN) delivered a total return of +242. 9%, compared to +31. 0% for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BVN returned +288. 8% versus AG's +128. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BVN or AG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.
A. A. (BVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus First Majestic Silver Corp. 's 1. 56β — meaning AG is approximately 86% more volatile than BVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 17% for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BVN or AG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Majestic Silver Corp.
(AG) is pulling ahead at 128. 2% versus 50. 9% for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. (BVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Majestic Silver Corp. grew EPS 202. 9% year-over-year, compared to 95. 0% for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BVN leads at 28. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BVN or AG?
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.
A. A. (BVN) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 2% net margin versus 13. 1% for First Majestic Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 45. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BVN leads at 35. 6% versus 27. 8% for AG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BVN leads at 43. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BVN or AG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.
A. A. (BVN) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for First Majestic Silver Corp. — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BVN: 28. 2% to $43. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BVN or AG?
In this comparison, BVN (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. AG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BVN or AG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.
A. A. (BVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 1. 3% yield, +288. 8% 10Y return). First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BVN: +288. 8%, AG: +128. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BVN and AG?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BVN pays a dividend while AG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.