Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BVN vs AG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BVN
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • PE
Market Cap$8.62B
5Y Perf.+332.1%
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.

Silver

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$10.55B
5Y Perf.+113.5%

BVN vs AG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BVN logoBVN
AG logoAG
IndustryOther Precious MetalsSilver
Market Cap$8.62B$10.55B
Revenue (TTM)$1.74B$1.27B
Net Income (TTM)$785M$174M
Gross Margin48.6%35.5%
Operating Margin35.7%29.0%
Forward P/E8.4x20.4x
Total Debt$710M$314M
Cash & Equiv.$530M$792M

BVN vs AGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BVN
AG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Compañía de Minas B… (BVN)100432.1+332.1%
First Majestic Silv… (AG)100213.5+113.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BVN vs AG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BVN leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. First Majestic Silver Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BVN
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
The Income Pick

BVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 1.3%
  • 288.8% 10Y total return vs AG's 128.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 16.6%, current ratio 2.01x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
The Growth Play

AG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 128.2%, EPS growth 202.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.8%
  • 128.2% revenue growth vs BVN's 50.9%
  • +241.7% vs BVN's +132.8%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAG logoAG128.2% revenue growth vs BVN's 50.9%
ValueBVN logoBVNLower P/E (8.4x vs 20.4x)
Quality / MarginsBVN logoBVN45.2% margin vs AG's 13.7%
Stability / SafetyBVN logoBVNBeta 0.84 vs AG's 1.56
DividendsBVN logoBVN1.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AG's 0.1%
Momentum (1Y)AG logoAG+241.7% vs BVN's +132.8%
Efficiency (ROA)BVN logoBVN14.1% ROA vs AG's 4.1%, ROIC 11.4% vs 13.1%

BVN vs AG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BVNCompañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
FY 2025
Corporates
52.3%$1.6B
Silver
20.6%$627M
Copper
19.3%$588M
Commercial deductions
4.0%$122M
Zinc
2.2%$68M
Lead
1.1%$34M
Services
0.4%$11M
Other (1)
0.0%$309,000
AGFirst Majestic Silver Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

BVN vs AG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBVNLAGGINGAG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BVN and AG operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $1.3B in trailing revenue. BVN is the more profitable business, keeping 45.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AG's 13.7%. On growth, AG holds the edge at +171.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBVN logoBVNCompañía de Minas…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.7B$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$760M$636M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$785M$174M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$105M$351M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.6%+35.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.7%+29.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+45.2%+13.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.0%+27.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+109.3%+171.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.7%+4.8%
BVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BVN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 10.9x trailing earnings, BVN trades at a 82% valuation discount to AG's 61.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BVN's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AG's 15.8x.

MetricBVN logoBVNCompañía de Minas…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
Market CapShares × price$8.6B$10.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.8B$10.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.94x61.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.38x20.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.45x15.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.94x8.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.02x3.27x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF82.08x30.01x
BVN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AG leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

BVN delivers a 20.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $6 for AG. AG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BVN's 0.17x.

MetricBVN logoBVNCompañía de Minas…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+20.2%+5.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+14.1%+4.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.4%+13.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.4%+11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x0.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$180M-$478M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$530M$792M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$710M$314M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.72x20.24x
AG leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BVN five years ago would be worth $34,291 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,105 for AG. Over the past 12 months, AG leads with a +241.7% total return vs BVN's +132.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BVN at 70.7% vs AG's 46.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBVN logoBVNCompañía de Minas…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.0%+33.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+132.8%+241.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+397.6%+212.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+242.9%+31.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+288.8%+128.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+70.7%+46.3%
BVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BVN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AG's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BVN currently trades 75.9% from its 52-week high vs AG's 66.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBVN logoBVNCompañía de Minas…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.84x1.56x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$44.67$32.03
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.00$5.49
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.9%+66.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.152.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M16.9M
BVN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BVN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates BVN as "Buy" and AG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.2% upside for BVN (target: $44) vs 24.0% for AG (target: $27). BVN is the only dividend payer here at 1.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBVN logoBVNCompañía de Minas…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$43.50$26.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts811
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.44$0.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%
BVN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BVN leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallCompañía de Minas Buenavent… (BVN)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BVN vs AG: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BVN or AG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is the stronger pick with 128. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 50. 9% for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. (BVN). Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. (BVN) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. (BVN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BVN or AG?

On trailing P/E, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. at 61. 1x. On forward P/E, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BVN or AG?

Over the past 5 years, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) delivered a total return of +242. 9%, compared to +31. 0% for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BVN returned +288. 8% versus AG's +128. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BVN or AG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus First Majestic Silver Corp. 's 1. 56β — meaning AG is approximately 86% more volatile than BVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 17% for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BVN or AG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is pulling ahead at 128. 2% versus 50. 9% for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. (BVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Majestic Silver Corp. grew EPS 202. 9% year-over-year, compared to 95. 0% for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BVN leads at 28. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BVN or AG?

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 2% net margin versus 13. 1% for First Majestic Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 45. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BVN leads at 35. 6% versus 27. 8% for AG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BVN leads at 43. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BVN or AG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for First Majestic Silver Corp. — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BVN: 28. 2% to $43. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BVN or AG?

In this comparison, BVN (1.

3% yield) pays a dividend. AG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BVN or AG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 1. 3% yield, +288. 8% 10Y return). First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BVN: +288. 8%, AG: +128. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BVN and AG?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

BVN pays a dividend while AG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BVN

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 54%
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AG

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 85%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BVN and AG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BVN: 109.3% · AG: 171.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(BVN: 45.2% · AG: 13.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BVN: 10.9x · AG: 61.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.