BVN vs EXK vs HL vs AG

For growth investors, First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is the stronger pick with 128. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. (BVN) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. (BVN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. at 62. 5x. On forward P/E, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S. A. A. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) delivered a total return of +241. 3%, compared to +39. 0% for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +373. 7% versus AG's +133. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 80β — meaning EXK is approximately 88% more volatile than BVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is pulling ahead at 128. 2% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BVN leads at 28. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 2% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 45. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus 3. 8% for EXK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BVN leads at 43. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 20. 9x for First Majestic Silver Corp. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXK: 27. 1% to $12. 75.

In this comparison, BVN (1.

2% yield) pays a dividend. EXK, HL, AG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.

A. A. (BVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 2% yield, +305. 2% 10Y return). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BVN: +305. 2%, EXK: +179. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BVN is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BVN pays a dividend while EXK, HL, AG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.