Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Marine Shipping
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $3.06B | $140M | $1.74B | $511M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.63B | $158M | $348M | $331M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $242M | $60M | $75M | $59M |
| Gross Margin | 15.9% | 53.4% | 52.9% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 48.0% | 50.6% | 43.1% |
| Forward P/E | 7.6x | 3.3x | 18.5x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $990M | $321M | $1.85B | $1.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $242M | $68M | $448M | $165M |
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BW LPG Limited (BWLP) | 100 | 267.3 | +167.3% |
| Dynagas LNG Partner… (DLNG) | 100 | 135.7 | +35.7% |
| FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) | 100 | 96.0 | -4.0% |
| Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWLP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -37.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.1%
- 451.1% 10Y total return vs FLNG's 240.5%
- 3.5% revenue growth vs CLCO's -10.8%
- +123.6% vs DLNG's +12.5%
DLNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.00, yield 10.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.00, Low D/E 66.2%, current ratio 0.93x
- Beta 0.00, yield 10.5%, current ratio 0.93x
- Lower P/E (3.3x vs 12.1x)
FLNG is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 9.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CLCO's 14.2%
CLCO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs CLCO's -10.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.3x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs BWLP's 6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.00 vs BWLP's 0.85 | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CLCO's 14.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +123.6% vs DLNG's +12.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs CLCO's 2.6%, ROIC 8.4% vs 6.7% |
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DLNG leads in 2 of 6 categories
BWLP leads 1 • FLNG leads 0 • CLCO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DLNG and CLCO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWLP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 22.9x DLNG's $158M. DLNG is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWLP's 6.7%. On growth, CLCO holds the edge at +9.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $158M | $348M | $331M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $581M | $108M | $252M | $222M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $242M | $60M | $75M | $59M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $387M | $103M | $133M | -$348M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +53.4% | +52.9% | +61.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +48.0% | +50.6% | +43.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +37.9% | +21.5% | +17.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +65.0% | +38.4% | -105.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.2% | -0.5% | -3.7% | +9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +24.4% | -52.4% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DLNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, DLNG trades at a 84% valuation discount to FLNG's 23.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DLNG's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLNG's 12.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $140M | $1.7B | $511M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $392M | $3.1B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.32x | 3.66x | 23.36x | 5.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.60x | 3.31x | 18.53x | 12.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.42x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.67x | 3.58x | 12.46x | 7.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 0.89x | 5.02x | 1.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 0.29x | 2.42x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.58x | 1.52x | 12.93x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DLNG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DLNG delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for CLCO. BWLP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNG's 2.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DLNG scores 9/9 vs FLNG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +12.7% | +10.4% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +7.3% | +2.9% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +7.6% | +6.1% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +12.8% | +7.1% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.66x | 2.57x | 1.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $748M | $253M | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $242M | $68M | $448M | $165M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $990M | $321M | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.93x | 3.87x | 1.81x | 1.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BWLP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWLP five years ago would be worth $42,814 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,188 for CLCO. Over the past 12 months, BWLP leads with a +123.6% total return vs DLNG's +12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BWLP at 58.4% vs CLCO's 2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +66.7% | +4.6% | +33.7% | +0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +123.6% | +12.5% | +47.0% | +62.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +297.1% | +62.8% | +27.6% | +6.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +328.1% | +49.3% | +293.5% | +1.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +451.1% | -33.0% | +240.5% | +1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.4% | +17.6% | +8.4% | +2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BWLP and DLNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DLNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWLP's 0.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWLP currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs DLNG's 86.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 0.00x | 0.15x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.74 | $4.45 | $33.40 | $10.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.95 | $3.40 | $21.72 | $5.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +86.3% | +96.5% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 40.9 | 57.0 | 41.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 409K | 101K | 617K | 104K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FLNG and CLCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DLNG as "Hold", FLNG as "Hold", CLCO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.2% upside for DLNG (target: $5) vs -25.6% for FLNG (target: $24). For income investors, CLCO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.24% vs BWLP's 6.70%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.50 | $24.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.7% | +10.5% | +9.3% | +14.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.35 | $0.40 | $3.00 | $1.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DLNG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BWLP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BW LPG Limited (BWLP) is the stronger pick with 3.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO). Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (3. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO?
On trailing P/E, Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) is the cheapest at 3.
7x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Dynagas LNG Partners LP is actually cheaper at 3. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO?
Over the past 5 years, BW LPG Limited (BWLP) delivered a total return of +328.
1%, compared to +1. 9% for Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWLP returned +451. 1% versus DLNG's -33. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
00β versus BW LPG Limited's 0. 85β — meaning BWLP is approximately 17631% more volatile than DLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BW LPG Limited (BWLP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 3% for FLEX LNG Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BW LPG Limited (BWLP) is pulling ahead at 3.
5% versus -10. 8% for Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dynagas LNG Partners LP grew EPS 59. 1% year-over-year, compared to -44. 0% for Cool Company Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BWLP leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO?
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
0% net margin versus 6. 8% for BW LPG Limited — meaning it keeps 33. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLNG leads at 50. 6% versus 8. 3% for BWLP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLCO leads at 76. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) trades at 3.
3x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for FLEX LNG Ltd. — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DLNG: 17. 2% to $4. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) offers the highest yield at 14. 2%, versus 6. 7% for BW LPG Limited (BWLP).
09Is BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 9. 3% yield, +240. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLNG: +240. 5%, BWLP: +451. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWLP and DLNG and FLNG and CLCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (BWLP (Industrials) and DLNG (Energy) and FLNG (Energy) and CLCO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BWLP is a small-cap deep-value stock; DLNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLNG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLCO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.