Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO vs STNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Marine Shipping
Oil & Gas Midstream
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO vs STNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $3.06B | $140M | $1.74B | $511M | $4.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.63B | $158M | $348M | $331M | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $242M | $60M | $75M | $59M | $502M |
| Gross Margin | 15.9% | 53.4% | 52.9% | 61.8% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 48.0% | 50.6% | 43.1% | 38.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.6x | 3.3x | 18.5x | 12.1x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $990M | $321M | $1.85B | $1.31B | $619M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $242M | $68M | $448M | $165M | $752M |
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO vs STNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BW LPG Limited (BWLP) | 100 | 267.3 | +167.3% |
| Dynagas LNG Partner… (DLNG) | 100 | 135.7 | +35.7% |
| FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) | 100 | 96.0 | -4.0% |
| Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 150.4 | +50.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO vs STNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWLP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -37.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.1%
- 451.1% 10Y total return vs STNG's 62.8%
- 3.5% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
- +123.6% vs DLNG's +12.5%
DLNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.00, yield 10.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.00, Low D/E 66.2%, current ratio 0.93x
- Beta 0.00, yield 10.5%, current ratio 0.93x
- Lower P/E (3.3x vs 12.1x)
Among these 5 stocks, FLNG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CLCO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 14.2% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
STNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.26 vs FLNG's 0.33
- 48.4% margin vs BWLP's 6.7%
- 12.6% ROA vs CLCO's 2.6%, ROIC 7.2% vs 6.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.3x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.4% margin vs BWLP's 6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.00 vs BWLP's 0.85 | |
| Dividends | 14.2% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +123.6% vs DLNG's +12.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs CLCO's 2.6%, ROIC 7.2% vs 6.7% |
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO vs STNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STNG leads in 2 of 6 categories
DLNG leads 1 • BWLP leads 1 • FLNG leads 0 • CLCO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWLP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 22.9x DLNG's $158M. STNG is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWLP's 6.7%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $158M | $348M | $331M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $581M | $108M | $252M | $222M | $580M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $242M | $60M | $75M | $59M | $502M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $387M | $103M | $133M | -$348M | $389M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +53.4% | +52.9% | +61.8% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +48.0% | +50.6% | +43.1% | +38.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +37.9% | +21.5% | +17.8% | +48.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +65.0% | +38.4% | -105.0% | +37.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.2% | -0.5% | -3.7% | +9.9% | +46.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +24.4% | -52.4% | -100.0% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DLNG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, DLNG trades at a 84% valuation discount to FLNG's 23.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STNG offers better value at 0.36x vs FLNG's 0.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $140M | $1.7B | $511M | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $392M | $3.1B | $1.7B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.32x | 3.66x | 23.36x | 5.31x | 12.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.60x | 3.31x | 18.53x | 12.09x | 8.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.42x | — | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.67x | 3.58x | 12.46x | 7.41x | 8.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 0.89x | 5.02x | 1.59x | 4.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 0.29x | 2.42x | 0.68x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.58x | 1.52x | 12.93x | — | 8.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for CLCO. STNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNG's 2.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DLNG scores 9/9 vs FLNG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +12.7% | +10.4% | +7.5% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +7.3% | +2.9% | +2.6% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +7.6% | +6.1% | +6.7% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +12.8% | +7.1% | +8.7% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.66x | 2.57x | 1.72x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $748M | $253M | $1.4B | $1.1B | -$133M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $242M | $68M | $448M | $165M | $752M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $990M | $321M | $1.8B | $1.3B | $619M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.93x | 3.87x | 1.81x | 1.36x | 6.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BWLP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STNG five years ago would be worth $45,904 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,188 for CLCO. Over the past 12 months, BWLP leads with a +123.6% total return vs DLNG's +12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BWLP at 58.4% vs CLCO's 2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +66.7% | +4.6% | +33.7% | +0.3% | +71.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +123.6% | +12.5% | +47.0% | +62.5% | +115.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +297.1% | +62.8% | +27.6% | +6.2% | +92.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +328.1% | +49.3% | +293.5% | +1.9% | +359.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +451.1% | -33.0% | +240.5% | +1.9% | +62.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.4% | +17.6% | +8.4% | +2.0% | +24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BWLP and DLNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DLNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWLP's 0.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWLP currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs DLNG's 86.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 0.00x | 0.15x | 0.16x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.74 | $4.45 | $33.40 | $10.00 | $87.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.95 | $3.40 | $21.72 | $5.78 | $37.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +86.3% | +96.5% | +96.7% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 40.9 | 57.0 | 41.8 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 409K | 101K | 617K | 104K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLCO and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DLNG as "Hold", FLNG as "Hold", CLCO as "Hold", STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.2% upside for DLNG (target: $5) vs -25.6% for FLNG (target: $24). For income investors, CLCO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.24% vs STNG's 1.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.50 | $24.00 | — | $85.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 2 | 1 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.7% | +10.5% | +9.3% | +14.2% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.35 | $0.40 | $3.00 | $1.38 | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
STNG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DLNG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BWLP vs DLNG vs FLNG vs CLCO vs STNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO or STNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BW LPG Limited (BWLP) is the stronger pick with 3.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (3. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO or STNG?
On trailing P/E, Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) is the cheapest at 3.
7x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Dynagas LNG Partners LP is actually cheaper at 3. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Scorpio Tankers Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. 's 0. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO or STNG?
Over the past 5 years, Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) delivered a total return of +359. 0%, compared to +1. 9% for Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWLP returned +451. 1% versus DLNG's -33. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO or STNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
00β versus BW LPG Limited's 0. 85β — meaning BWLP is approximately 17631% more volatile than DLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for FLEX LNG Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO or STNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BW LPG Limited (BWLP) is pulling ahead at 3.
5% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dynagas LNG Partners LP grew EPS 59. 1% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BWLP leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO or STNG?
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 6. 8% for BW LPG Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLNG leads at 50. 6% versus 8. 3% for BWLP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLCO leads at 76. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO or STNG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. 's 0. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Dynagas LNG Partners LP (DLNG) trades at 3. 3x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for FLEX LNG Ltd. — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DLNG: 17. 2% to $4. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO or STNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) offers the highest yield at 14. 2%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is BWLP or DLNG or FLNG or CLCO or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 9. 3% yield, +240. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLNG: +240. 5%, BWLP: +451. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWLP and DLNG and FLNG and CLCO and STNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (BWLP (Industrials) and DLNG (Energy) and FLNG (Energy) and CLCO (Industrials) and STNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BWLP is a small-cap deep-value stock; DLNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLNG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.