BWMN vs MYRG

For growth investors, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.

(BWMN) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) offers the better valuation at 42. 6x trailing P/E (17. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.

(BWMN) is the cheapest at 42. 6x versus MYR Group Inc. at 59. 2x. On forward P/E, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. is actually cheaper at 17. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. wins at 0. 35x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 34x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) delivered a total return of +392. 9%, compared to +128. 5% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYRG returned +1781% versus BWMN's +121. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 79β versus Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. 's 1. 81β — meaning BWMN is approximately 1% more volatile than MYRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 56% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.

(BWMN) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. grew EPS 329. 4% year-over-year, compared to 311. 5% for MYR Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BWMN leads at 23. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus 2. 5% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MYRG leads at 4. 4% versus 3. 9% for BWMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BWMN leads at 47. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 34x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) trades at 17. 9x forward P/E versus 39. 0x for MYR Group Inc. — 21. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BWMN: 86. 7% to $58. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1781% 10Y return). Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MYRG: +1781%, BWMN: +121. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.