Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BWSN vs AMSC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BWSN
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.40B
5Y Perf.+0.7%
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.65B
5Y Perf.+30.7%

BWSN vs AMSC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BWSN logoBWSN
AMSC logoAMSC
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsIndustrial - Machinery
Market Cap$2.40B$2.65B
Revenue (TTM)$635M$279M
Net Income (TTM)$-36M$130M
Gross Margin25.5%30.6%
Operating Margin5.2%4.9%
Forward P/E15.9x
Total Debt$369M$3M
Cash & Equiv.$90M$79M

BWSN vs AMSCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BWSN
AMSC
StockFeb 21Dec 25Return
Babcock & Wilcox En… (BWSN)100100.7+0.7%
American Supercondu… (AMSC)100130.7+30.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BWSN vs AMSC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMSC leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BWSN
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I
The Income Pick

BWSN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 0.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.16, current ratio 1.22x
  • Beta 0.16, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.22x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
The Growth Play

AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
  • 396.8% 10Y total return vs BWSN's 37.3%
  • 53.0% revenue growth vs BWSN's -18.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMSC logoAMSC53.0% revenue growth vs BWSN's -18.1%
Quality / MarginsAMSC logoAMSC46.7% margin vs BWSN's -5.7%
Stability / SafetyBWSN logoBWSNBeta 0.16 vs AMSC's 2.98
DividendsBWSN logoBWSN0.8% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMSC logoAMSC+158.0% vs BWSN's +132.2%
Efficiency (ROA)AMSC logoAMSC18.1% ROA vs BWSN's -5.3%, ROIC -0.9% vs 9.1%

BWSN vs AMSC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BWSNBabcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I
FY 2023
B&W Thermal Segment
48.9%$499M
B&W Renewable Segment
31.2%$319M
B&W Environmental Segment
19.9%$203M
AMSCAmerican Superconductor Corporation
FY 2024
Grid
82.7%$170M
Wind
17.3%$36M

BWSN vs AMSC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMSCLAGGINGBWSN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BWSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $635M annually — 2.3x AMSC's $279M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWSN's -5.7%. On growth, BWSN holds the edge at +142.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBWSN logoBWSNBabcock & Wilcox …AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$635M$279M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$43M$18M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$36M$130M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$86M$16M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.5%+30.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.2%+4.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.7%+46.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-13.5%+5.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+142.9%+21.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+106.4%+39.9%
AMSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BWSN leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, BWSN's 69.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMSC's 471.5x.

MetricBWSN logoBWSNBabcock & Wilcox …AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
Market CapShares × price$2.4B$2.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.9B$2.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-30.71x344.94x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.94x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple69.63x471.48x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.34x11.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share10.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF102.43x
BWSN leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSC scores 7/9 vs BWSN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBWSN logoBWSNBabcock & Wilcox …AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+24.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.3%+18.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.1%-0.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.5%-0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–927
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$279M-$76M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$90M$79M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$369M$3M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.97x
AMSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMSC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMSC five years ago would be worth $39,648 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,325 for BWSN. Over the past 12 months, AMSC leads with a +158.0% total return vs BWSN's +132.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 141.9% vs BWSN's 8.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBWSN logoBWSNBabcock & Wilcox …AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+74.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+132.2%+158.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+26.2%+1315.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+33.3%+296.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+37.3%+396.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.1%+141.9%
AMSC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BWSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BWSN is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMSC's 2.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWSN currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs AMSC's 78.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBWSN logoBWSNBabcock & Wilcox …AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.16x2.98x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.40$70.49
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.84$20.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.1%+78.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.964.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2K1.1M
BWSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

BWSN is the only dividend payer here at 0.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBWSN logoBWSNBabcock & Wilcox …AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$52.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts15
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.14
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AMSC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BWSN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallAmerican Superconductor Cor… (AMSC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BWSN vs AMSC: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BWSN or AMSC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWSN). American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) offers the better valuation at 344. 9x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — BWSN or AMSC?

Over the past 5 years, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) delivered a total return of +296.

5%, compared to +33. 3% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMSC returned +396. 8% versus BWSN's +37. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — BWSN or AMSC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWSN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

16β versus American Superconductor Corporation's 2. 98β — meaning AMSC is approximately 1737% more volatile than BWSN relative to the S&P 500.

04

Which is growing faster — BWSN or AMSC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.

0% versus -18. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Superconductor Corporation grew EPS 143. 2% year-over-year, compared to 41. 5% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMSC leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — BWSN or AMSC?

American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

7% net margin versus -6. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I — meaning it keeps 2. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWSN leads at 3. 9% versus -0. 5% for AMSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMSC leads at 27. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — BWSN or AMSC?

In this comparison, BWSN (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. AMSC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is BWSN or AMSC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

16), 0. 8% yield). American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BWSN: +37. 3%, AMSC: +396. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between BWSN and AMSC?

These companies operate in different sectors (BWSN (Technology) and AMSC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BWSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock. BWSN pays a dividend while AMSC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BWSN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 71%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMSC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BWSN and AMSC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BWSN: 142.9% · AMSC: 21.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.