BWXT vs HII vs GD vs CW

For growth investors, BWX Technologies, Inc.

(BWXT) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 2% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII). Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (18. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

(HII) is the cheapest at 20. 4x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. at 58. 4x. On forward P/E, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Curtiss-Wright Corporation wins at 2. 20x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. 's 10. 23x.

Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +449.

0%, compared to +56. 7% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CW returned +823. 2% versus HII's +131. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

54β versus BWX Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning BWXT is approximately 192% more volatile than GD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, General Dynamics Corporation (GD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 163% for BWX Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BWX Technologies, Inc.

(BWXT) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus 8. 2% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Curtiss-Wright Corporation grew EPS 22. 0% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BWXT leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

8% net margin versus 4. 8% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CW leads at 18. 2% versus 4. 9% for HII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CW leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 20x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. 's 10. 23x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) trades at 18. 2x forward P/E versus 48. 0x for Curtiss-Wright Corporation — 29. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HII: 33. 5% to $420. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 0. 1% for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).

For long-horizon retirement investors, General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

54), 1. 7% yield, +174. 7% 10Y return). BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GD: +174. 7%, BWXT: +538. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BWXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HII is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HII, GD pay a dividend while BWXT, CW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.