BXC
BlueLinx Holdings Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$409M
5Y Perf.+659.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BXC vs SITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
Industrial - Distribution
Market Cap$5.54B
5Y Perf.+13.8%
BXC vs SITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BXC | SITE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $409M | $5.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.98B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 15.0% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 58.2x | 27.9x |
| Total Debt | $674M | $980M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $386M | $191M |
BXC vs SITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BXC
SITE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlueLinx Holdings I… (BXC) | 100 | 759.3 | +659.3% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 113.8 | +13.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BXC vs SITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SITE leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BXC
BlueLinx Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick
BXC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.86
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs SITE's 368.6%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
The Growth Play
SITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 58.2%, current ratio 2.47x
- Beta 1.24, current ratio 2.47x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SITE | 3.6% revenue growth vs BXC's 0.1% |
| Value | SITE | Lower P/E (27.9x vs 58.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | SITE | 3.2% margin vs BXC's -0.1% |
| Stability / Safety | SITE | Beta 1.24 vs BXC's 1.86, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SITE | +5.6% vs BXC's -18.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SITE | 4.6% ROA vs BXC's -0.3%, ROIC 7.3% vs 2.9% |
BXC vs SITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
BXC vs SITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSITELAGGINGBXC
BXCBlueLinx Holdings Inc.
2leads
SITESiteOne Landscape Sup…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BXCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SITE5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BXC4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SITE7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SITE4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SITE2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
BXC1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 1.6x BXC's $3.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.2% (SITE) to -0.1% (BXC). On growth, BXC holds the edge at +3.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BXCBlueLinx Holdings… | SITESiteOne Landscape… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $70M | $382M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | $246M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -154.5% | +1.6% |
SITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BXC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.1x trailing earnings, SITE trades at a 98% valuation discount to BXC's 1905.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BXC's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SITE's 16.7x.
| Metric | BXCBlueLinx Holdings… | SITESiteOne Landscape… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $409M | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $697M | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1905.43x | 37.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.21x | 27.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 8.94x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.63x | 16.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 3.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.46x | 22.44x |
BXC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SITE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SITE delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-1 for BXC. SITE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXC's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs BXC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BXCBlueLinx Holdings… | SITESiteOne Landscape… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.7% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $288M | $789M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $386M | $191M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $674M | $980M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.69x | 6.79x |
SITE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SITE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BXC five years ago would be worth $7,872 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,157 for SITE. Over the past 12 months, SITE leads with a +5.6% total return vs BXC's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SITE at -6.7% vs BXC's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BXCBlueLinx Holdings… | SITESiteOne Landscape… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.4% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.9% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.1% | -18.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.3% | -38.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +673.4% | +368.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.8% | -6.7% |
SITE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SITE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SITE is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BXC's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SITE currently trades 74.1% from its 52-week high vs BXC's 59.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BXCBlueLinx Holdings… | SITESiteOne Landscape… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.01x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.30 | $168.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.84 | $112.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.6% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 36.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 109K | 689K |
SITE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
BXC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BXC as "Buy" and SITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 114.2% upside for BXC (target: $113) vs 29.9% for SITE (target: $162).
| Metric | BXCBlueLinx Holdings… | SITESiteOne Landscape… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $112.67 | $162.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.9% | +1.8% |
BXC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
SITE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BXC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallSiteOne Landscape Supply, I… (SITE)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BXC vs SITE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BXC or SITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC). SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) offers the better valuation at 37. 1x trailing P/E (27. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BXC or SITE?
On trailing P/E, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the cheapest at 37. 1x versus BlueLinx Holdings Inc. at 1905. 4x. On forward P/E, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. is actually cheaper at 27. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BXC or SITE?
Over the past 5 years, BlueLinx Holdings Inc.
(BXC) delivered a total return of -21. 3%, compared to -38. 4% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BXC returned +670. 4% versus SITE's +353. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BXC or SITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus BlueLinx Holdings Inc. 's 2. 01β — meaning BXC is approximately 74% more volatile than SITE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 58% versus 109% for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BXC or SITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus 0. 1% for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. grew EPS 24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -99. 6% for BlueLinx Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BXC or SITE?
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus 0. 0% for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SITE leads at 5. 1% versus 1. 1% for BXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SITE leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BXC or SITE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) trades at 27. 9x forward P/E versus 58. 2x for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. — 30. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BXC: 114. 2% to $112. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — BXC or SITE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BXC or SITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), +353. 7% 10Y return). BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SITE: +353. 7%, BXC: +670. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BXC and SITE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BXC: 3.1% · SITE: 0.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(BXC: 1905.4x · SITE: 37.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.