REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BXP vs PDM vs SLG vs HIW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
BXP vs PDM vs SLG vs HIW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $9.29B | $1.05B | $3.11B | $2.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.48B | $422M | $981M | $820M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $277M | $-86M | $-88M | $93M |
| Gross Margin | 60.6% | 19.1% | 58.2% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 42.3% | 13.9% | 42.7% | 25.6% |
| Forward P/E | 35.9x | — | — | 40.0x |
| Total Debt | $17.36B | $2.27B | $7.91B | $3.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.48B | $731K | $336M | $27M |
BXP vs PDM vs SLG vs HIW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BXP, Inc. (BXP) | 100 | 69.6 | -30.4% |
| Piedmont Office Rea… (PDM) | 100 | 50.7 | -49.3% |
| SL Green Realty Cor… (SLG) | 100 | 100.1 | +0.1% |
| Highwoods Propertie… (HIW) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BXP vs PDM vs SLG vs HIW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BXP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 6.9%
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth 18.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- Lower P/E (35.9x vs 40.0x)
PDM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +29.6% vs SLG's -15.7%
SLG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4%
HIW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -6.0% 10Y total return vs SLG's -26.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 42.45x
- Beta 0.76, yield 7.8%, current ratio 42.45x
- 11.4% margin vs PDM's -20.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (35.9x vs 40.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.4% margin vs PDM's -20.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs SLG's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.8% yield, vs BXP's 6.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.6% vs SLG's -15.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs PDM's -2.2%, ROIC 2.7% vs 1.5% |
BXP vs PDM vs SLG vs HIW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BXP vs PDM vs SLG vs HIW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIW leads in 3 of 6 categories
BXP leads 1 • SLG leads 1 • PDM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 8.2x PDM's $422M. HIW is the more profitable business, keeping 11.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PDM's -20.5%. On growth, SLG holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.5B | $422M | $981M | $820M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.4B | $229M | $678M | $511M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $277M | -$86M | -$88M | $93M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $690M | $47M | $28M | $318M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.6% | +19.1% | +58.2% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +42.3% | +13.9% | +42.7% | +25.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | -20.5% | -9.0% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +11.2% | +2.9% | +38.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | -100.0% | +9.2% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -23.0% | -13.2% | -67.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BXP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, HIW trades at a 49% valuation discount to BXP's 33.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BXP's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLG's 26.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.3B | $1.1B | $3.1B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.2B | $3.3B | $10.7B | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.64x | -12.55x | -27.51x | 17.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.88x | — | — | 39.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.84x | 10.85x | 26.07x | 12.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.67x | 1.86x | 3.10x | 3.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 0.70x | 0.71x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.47x | — | — | 16.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PDM. HIW carries lower financial leverage with a 1.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXP's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BXP scores 6/9 vs SLG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.6% | -5.7% | -2.0% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | -2.2% | -0.8% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +1.5% | +1.1% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +2.0% | +1.5% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.26x | 1.52x | 1.82x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.9B | $2.3B | $7.6B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $731,000 | $336M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17.4B | $2.3B | $7.9B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.59x | 0.35x | — | 2.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SLG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLG five years ago would be worth $8,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,164 for PDM. Over the past 12 months, PDM leads with a +29.6% total return vs SLG's -15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLG at 32.3% vs BXP's 10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.7% | +1.4% | -5.5% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.8% | +29.6% | -15.7% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.7% | +43.2% | +131.4% | +39.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.2% | -38.4% | -15.6% | -19.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.7% | -22.4% | -26.9% | -6.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.2% | +12.7% | +32.3% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PDM and HIW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HIW is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLG's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PDM currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs SLG's 65.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 1.08x | 1.20x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.33 | $9.19 | $66.91 | $32.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $49.72 | $6.32 | $34.77 | $20.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.8% | +91.5% | +65.4% | +76.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 60.7 | 54.3 | 61.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 1.1M | 1.3M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
HIW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BXP as "Buy", PDM as "Hold", SLG as "Hold", HIW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.2% upside for BXP (target: $72) vs 7.6% for HIW (target: $27). For income investors, HIW offers the higher dividend yield at 7.81% vs PDM's 2.95%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $72.10 | $10.00 | $50.46 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 42 | 11 | 31 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.9% | +3.0% | — | +7.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.05 | $0.25 | — | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
HIW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BXP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BXP vs PDM vs SLG vs HIW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BXP or PDM or SLG or HIW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is the stronger pick with 42. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (40. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BXP, Inc. (BXP) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BXP or PDM or SLG or HIW?
On trailing P/E, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus BXP, Inc. at 33. 6x. On forward P/E, BXP, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BXP or PDM or SLG or HIW?
Over the past 5 years, SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) delivered a total return of -15. 6%, compared to -38. 4% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIW returned -5. 8% versus BXP's -26. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BXP or PDM or SLG or HIW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus SL Green Realty Corp. 's 1. 20β — meaning SLG is approximately 59% more volatile than HIW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 149% versus 2% for BXP, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BXP or PDM or SLG or HIW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is pulling ahead at 42. 0% versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BXP, Inc. grew EPS 1833% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for SL Green Realty Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLG leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BXP or PDM or SLG or HIW?
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 8% net margin versus -14. 8% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXP leads at 55. 7% versus 14. 1% for PDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIW leads at 67. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BXP or PDM or SLG or HIW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BXP, Inc.
(BXP) trades at 35. 9x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for Highwoods Properties, Inc. — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BXP: 23. 2% to $72. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — BXP or PDM or SLG or HIW?
In this comparison, HIW (7.
8% yield), BXP (6. 9% yield), PDM (3. 0% yield) pay a dividend. SLG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BXP or PDM or SLG or HIW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 7. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HIW: -5. 8%, SLG: -26. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BXP and PDM and SLG and HIW?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BXP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLG is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIW is a small-cap deep-value stock. BXP, PDM, HIW pay a dividend while SLG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.