Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BYNO vs GS vs MS vs LAZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
BYNO vs GS vs MS vs LAZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $43M | $337.53B | $340.97B | $4.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $125.10B | $114.98B | $3.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-740K | $17.18B | $16.86B | $237M |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 47.5% | 57.1% | 31.2% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 17.5% | 19.1% | 11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 79.1x | 17.9x | 18.0x | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $609.53B | $475.56B | $2.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $273K | $164.26B | $111.69B | $1.50B |
BYNO vs GS vs MS vs LAZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| byNordic Acquisitio… (BYNO) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
| The Goldman Sachs G… (GS) | 100 | 335.7 | +235.7% |
| Morgan Stanley (MS) | 100 | 258.1 | +158.1% |
| Lazard Ltd (LAZ) | 100 | 144.4 | +44.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYNO vs GS vs MS vs LAZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BYNO is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.11 vs LAZ's 1.85
GS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 1.14 vs MS's 1.88
- NIM 0.7% vs MS's 0.7%
- Lower P/E (17.9x vs 79.1x)
- 1.6% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs LAZ's 4.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
MS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.40, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 11.5%, EPS growth 28.3%
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs GS's 6.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, current ratio 1.17x
LAZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MS's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MS's 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.5% NII/revenue growth vs BYNO's -79.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.9x vs 79.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MS's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs LAZ's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs LAZ's 4.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.7% vs LAZ's +3.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MS's 0.4% |
BYNO vs GS vs MS vs LAZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BYNO vs GS vs MS vs LAZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LAZ leads in 2 of 6 categories
MS leads 1 • GS leads 1 • BYNO leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.1B annually — 92436.3x BYNO's $1M. MS is the more profitable business, keeping 14.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BYNO's -54.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $125.1B | $115.0B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $24.0B | $26.6B | $384M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$739,762 | $17.2B | $16.9B | $237M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$47.2B | -$17.9B | $519M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +47.5% | +57.1% | +31.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +17.5% | +19.1% | +11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -54.7% | +13.7% | +14.7% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -37.7% | -15.6% | +16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.2% | +45.8% | +48.9% | -43.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LAZ leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.1x trailing earnings, LAZ trades at a 75% valuation discount to BYNO's 79.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GS offers better value at 1.32x vs MS's 2.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $337.5B | $341.0B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | $782.8B | $704.8B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.06x | 20.71x | 20.98x | 20.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.93x | 18.00x | 15.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.32x | 2.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 32.57x | 26.49x | 11.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.70x | 2.97x | 1.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.70x | 3.03x | 4.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.40x | 8.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LAZ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAZ delivers a 26.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $3 for BYNO. LAZ carries lower financial leverage with a 2.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GS's 4.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MS scores 7/9 vs BYNO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | +13.6% | +15.3% | +26.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +1.0% | +1.2% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.2% | +3.1% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +4.0% | +3.3% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.88x | 4.22x | 2.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $445.3B | $363.9B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $272,588 | $164.3B | $111.7B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $609.5B | $475.6B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.33x | 0.45x | 4.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $30,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,688 for LAZ. Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +72.7% total return vs LAZ's +3.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 48.1% vs BYNO's 6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | +17.2% | +18.8% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.0% | +72.7% | +65.3% | +3.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | +224.8% | +157.5% | +65.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | +200.5% | +154.7% | +16.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | +666.8% | +854.4% | +98.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | +48.1% | +37.1% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
BYNO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYNO is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LAZ's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYNO currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs LAZ's 74.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 1.60x | 1.40x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.75 | $1095.89 | $219.16 | $58.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.01 | $609.59 | $128.81 | $38.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +97.0% | +97.7% | +74.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 57.3 | 62.2 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 414 | 1.9M | 4.5M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GS and LAZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GS as "Hold", MS as "Buy", LAZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.5% upside for LAZ (target: $47) vs -8.5% for GS (target: $973). For income investors, LAZ offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs GS's 1.56%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $972.70 | $201.25 | $47.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 55 | 52 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% | +1.9% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 14 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $16.62 | $4.14 | $1.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +69.0% | +3.7% | +1.7% | +2.2% |
LAZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BYNO vs GS vs MS vs LAZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYNO or GS or MS or LAZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the stronger pick with 11.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Lazard Ltd (LAZ) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Morgan Stanley (MS) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BYNO or GS or MS or LAZ?
On trailing P/E, Lazard Ltd (LAZ) is the cheapest at 20.
1x versus byNordic Acquisition Corporation at 79. 1x. On forward P/E, Lazard Ltd is actually cheaper at 15. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. wins at 1. 14x versus Morgan Stanley's 1. 88x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BYNO or GS or MS or LAZ?
Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) delivered a total return of +200. 5%, compared to +16. 9% for Lazard Ltd (LAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MS returned +854. 4% versus BYNO's +27. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BYNO or GS or MS or LAZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), byNordic Acquisition Corporation (BYNO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
11β versus Lazard Ltd's 1. 85β — meaning LAZ is approximately 1563% more volatile than BYNO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lazard Ltd (LAZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BYNO or GS or MS or LAZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Morgan Stanley (MS) is pulling ahead at 11.
5% versus -1. 4% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Morgan Stanley grew EPS 28. 3% year-over-year, compared to -19. 0% for Lazard Ltd. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BYNO or GS or MS or LAZ?
Morgan Stanley (MS) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
7% net margin versus -54. 7% for byNordic Acquisition Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BYNO leads at 24. 0% versus 13. 0% for LAZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MS leads at 57. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BYNO or GS or MS or LAZ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 14x versus Morgan Stanley's 1. 88x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Lazard Ltd (LAZ) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Morgan Stanley — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAZ: 7. 5% to $47. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BYNO or GS or MS or LAZ?
In this comparison, LAZ (4.
0% yield), MS (1. 9% yield), GS (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. BYNO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BYNO or GS or MS or LAZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, byNordic Acquisition Corporation (BYNO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
11)). Lazard Ltd (LAZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYNO: +27. 8%, LAZ: +98. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BYNO and GS and MS and LAZ?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BYNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GS is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MS is a large-cap quality compounder stock; LAZ is a small-cap income-oriented stock. GS, MS, LAZ pay a dividend while BYNO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.