Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BYNO vs NHIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Shell Companies
BYNO vs NHIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Shell Companies |
| Market Cap | $43M | $302M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-740K | $5M |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | — |
| Forward P/E | 79.1x | 54.6x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $273K | $1M |
BYNO vs NHIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| byNordic Acquisitio… (BYNO) | 100 | 109.1 | +9.1% |
| NewHold Investment … (NHIC) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYNO vs NHIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BYNO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 27.8% 10Y total return vs NHIC's 10.0%
NHIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.07
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.07, current ratio 1.07x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (54.6x vs 79.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs BYNO's -54.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs BYNO's 0.11 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.4% vs BYNO's +5.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs BYNO's -6.9% |
BYNO vs NHIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NHIC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BYNO and NHIC operate at a comparable scale, with $1M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$739,762 | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -54.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.2% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NHIC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
At 54.6x trailing earnings, NHIC trades at a 31% valuation discount to BYNO's 79.1x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $302M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | $300M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.06x | 54.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NHIC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BYNO delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $2 for NHIC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NHIC scores 3/9 vs BYNO's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $272,588 | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BYNO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BYNO five years ago would be worth $12,778 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,997 for NHIC. Over the past 12 months, NHIC leads with a +7.4% total return vs BYNO's +5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BYNO at 6.2% vs NHIC's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | +5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.0% | +7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | +10.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | +10.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | +10.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | +3.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BYNO and NHIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NHIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BYNO's 0.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYNO currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs NHIC's 94.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.75 | $11.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.01 | $10.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +94.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 414 | 177K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +69.0% | 0.0% |
NHIC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BYNO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
BYNO vs NHIC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYNO or NHIC a better buy right now?
NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) offers the better valuation at 54.
6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BYNO or NHIC?
On trailing P/E, NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the cheapest at 54.
6x versus byNordic Acquisition Corporation at 79. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BYNO or NHIC?
Over the past 5 years, byNordic Acquisition Corporation (BYNO) delivered a total return of +27.
8%, compared to +10. 0% for NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BYNO returned +27. 8% versus NHIC's +10. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BYNO or NHIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
07β versus byNordic Acquisition Corporation's 0. 11β — meaning BYNO is approximately 51% more volatile than NHIC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — BYNO or NHIC?
NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -54. 7% for byNordic Acquisition Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BYNO leads at 24. 0% versus 0. 0% for NHIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BYNO leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BYNO or NHIC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BYNO or NHIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
07)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NHIC: +10. 0%, BYNO: +27. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BYNO and NHIC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.