Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NHIC vs PSFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
NHIC vs PSFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $221M | $479M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-183M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 525.9x | 4.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $986K | $1.35B |
NHIC vs PSFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NewHold Investment … (NHIC) | 100 | 105.8 | +5.8% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 60.8 | -39.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NHIC vs PSFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NHIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.03
- EPS growth 131.2%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs PSFE's -92.2%
PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.2x vs 525.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (4.2x vs 525.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs PSFE's 2.35 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.7% vs PSFE's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs PSFE's -3.8%, ROIC -0.7% vs 3.6% |
NHIC vs PSFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NHIC vs PSFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and NHIC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $833,081 | $371M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $136M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -183.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $221M | $479M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $220M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 525.87x | -2.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NHIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NHIC delivers a 1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-24 for PSFE.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.6% | -24.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | -3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.9% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$986,000 | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $986,000 | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NHIC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NHIC five years ago would be worth $10,644 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $605 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, NHIC leads with a +5.7% total return vs PSFE's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NHIC at 2.1% vs PSFE's -13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.0% | +16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.7% | -38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | -35.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | -94.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | -92.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | -13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
NHIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NHIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NHIC currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.03x | 2.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.87 | $16.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.98 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +56.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.0 | 63.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 365K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +21.2% |
NHIC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NHIC vs PSFE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NHIC or PSFE a better buy right now?
NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) offers the better valuation at 525.
9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NHIC or PSFE?
Over the past 5 years, NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) delivered a total return of +6.
4%, compared to -94. 0% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NHIC returned +6. 4% versus PSFE's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NHIC or PSFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
03β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately 7692% more volatile than NHIC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — NHIC or PSFE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NewHold Investment Corp III grew EPS 131.
2% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NHIC or PSFE?
NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSFE leads at 7. 2% versus 0. 0% for NHIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSFE leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NHIC or PSFE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NHIC or PSFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
03)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NHIC: +6. 4%, PSFE: -92. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NHIC and PSFE?
These companies operate in different sectors (NHIC (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.