CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$138M
5Y Perf.+136.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CAAS vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.96T
5Y Perf.+125.1%
CAAS vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CAAS | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $138M | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $696M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 16.5% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $209M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $142M | $86.81B |
CAAS vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CAAS
AMZN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Automotive Sy… (CAAS) | 100 | 236.1 | +136.1% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAAS vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CAAS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick
CAAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 1.6%
- Rev growth 17.6%, EPS growth 43.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 46.5%, current ratio 1.36x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs CAAS's 33.5%
- 12.2% margin vs CAAS's 4.2%
- +48.6% vs CAAS's +14.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CAAS | 17.6% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% |
| Value | CAAS | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 35.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs CAAS's 4.2% |
| Stability / Safety | CAAS | Beta 0.42 vs AMZN's 1.51 |
| Dividends | CAAS | 1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMZN | +48.6% vs CAAS's +14.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs CAAS's 3.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs 8.8% |
CAAS vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
CAAS vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGCAAS
CAASChina Automotive Syst…
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CAASMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AMZN6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CAAS6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1066.8x CAAS's $696M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAAS's 4.2%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CAASChina Automotive … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $696M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $60M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | +74.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CAAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CAAS trades at a 92% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAAS's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.7x.
| Metric | CAASChina Automotive … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $138M | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $206M | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.23x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.16x | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.79x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.18x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.94x | 384.26x |
CAAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $7 for CAAS. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAAS's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAAS scores 7/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CAASChina Automotive … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.9% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $67M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $142M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $209M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.18x | 39.96x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,659 for CAAS. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs CAAS's +14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs CAAS's 7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CAASChina Automotive … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.5% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.0% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.5% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.4% | +37.5% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAAS and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs CAAS's 88.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CAASChina Automotive … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.15 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.84 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 45.6M |
Evenly matched — CAAS and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CAAS is the only dividend payer here at 1.58% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CAASChina Automotive … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.07 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CAAS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CAAS vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAAS or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the stronger pick with 17. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAAS or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, China Automotive Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAAS or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to +26. 6% for China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus CAAS's +33. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAAS or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 264% more volatile than CAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 46% for China Automotive Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAAS or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is pulling ahead at 17. 6% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Automotive Systems, Inc. grew EPS 43. 4% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAAS leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAAS or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 5. 6% for China Automotive Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus 7. 8% for CAAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAAS or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 28. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAAS or AMZN?
In this comparison, CAAS (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CAAS or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 1. 6% yield). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAAS: +33. 5%, AMZN: +715. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAAS and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAAS is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. CAAS pays a dividend while AMZN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CAAS: 11.1% · AMZN: 16.6%)Net Margin>
%
(CAAS: 4.2% · AMZN: 12.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CAAS: 3.2x · AMZN: 38.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.