CADE vs PNFP

For growth investors, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the stronger pick with 32.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 3% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP). Cadence Bank (CADE) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the cheapest at 15.

2x versus Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. at 16. 6x. On forward P/E, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cadence Bank wins at 3. 20x versus Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 's 3. 60x.

Over the past 5 years, Cadence Bank (CADE) delivered a total return of +55.

3%, compared to +17. 6% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PNFP returned +127. 9% versus CADE's +123. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

(PNFP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Cadence Bank's 1. 41β — meaning CADE is approximately 26% more volatile than PNFP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cadence Bank (CADE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 39% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadence Bank (CADE) is pulling ahead at 32.

4% versus 15. 3% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cadence Bank grew EPS -5. 1% year-over-year, compared to -16. 5% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Cadence Bank (CADE) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

0% net margin versus 16. 6% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CADE leads at 23. 3% versus 20. 4% for PNFP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CADE leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 20x versus Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 's 3. 60x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Cadence Bank — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNFP: 18. 8% to $117. 63.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Cadence Bank (CADE) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 0. 9% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

(PNFP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 9% yield, +127. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PNFP: +127. 9%, CADE: +123. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.