Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CAKE vs EAT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.02B
5Y Perf.+182.2%
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.31B
5Y Perf.+458.3%

CAKE vs EAT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CAKE logoCAKE
EAT logoEAT
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$3.02B$6.31B
Revenue (TTM)$3.75B$5.73B
Net Income (TTM)$148M$463M
Gross Margin78.3%46.0%
Operating Margin5.0%10.4%
Forward P/E15.0x13.7x
Total Debt$3.46B$1.69B
Cash & Equiv.$216M$19M

CAKE vs EATLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CAKE
EAT
StockMay 20May 26Return
The Cheesecake Fact… (CAKE)100282.2+182.2%
Brinker Internation… (EAT)100558.3+458.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CAKE vs EAT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EAT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated
The Income Pick

CAKE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 1.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 0.59x
  • Beta 1.11, yield 1.8%, current ratio 0.59x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
The Growth Play

EAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 144.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
  • 236.3% 10Y total return vs CAKE's 37.3%
  • 21.9% revenue growth vs CAKE's 4.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEAT logoEAT21.9% revenue growth vs CAKE's 4.7%
ValueEAT logoEATLower P/E (13.7x vs 15.0x)
Quality / MarginsEAT logoEAT8.1% margin vs CAKE's 4.0%
Stability / SafetyCAKE logoCAKEBeta 1.11 vs EAT's 1.12
DividendsCAKE logoCAKE1.8% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CAKE logoCAKE+24.7% vs EAT's +9.8%
Efficiency (ROA)EAT logoEAT17.0% ROA vs CAKE's 4.7%, ROIC 19.1% vs 4.7%

CAKE vs EAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CAKEThe Cheesecake Factory Incorporated
FY 2025
The Cheesecake Factory
71.7%$2.7B
Other Segments
9.7%$362M
Other FRC
9.5%$355M
North Italia
9.2%$346M
EATBrinker International, Inc.
FY 2025
Chili's Restaurants
90.7%$4.9B
Maggiano's Restaurants
9.3%$501M

CAKE vs EAT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEATLAGGINGCAKE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

EAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 1.5x CAKE's $3.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.1% (EAT) to 4.0% (CAKE).

MetricCAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.8B$5.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$296M$819M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$148M$463M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$155M$504M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+78.3%+46.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.0%+10.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.0%+8.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.1%+8.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.4%+3.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-28.6%+12.1%
EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 17.7x trailing earnings, EAT trades at a 10% valuation discount to CAKE's 19.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EAT's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAKE's 21.2x.

MetricCAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…
Market CapShares × price$3.0B$6.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.3B$8.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS19.75x17.68x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.99x13.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.16x11.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.81x1.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.72x18.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.49x15.25x
EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EAT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

EAT delivers a 123.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $123 in annual profit, vs $37 for CAKE. EAT carries lower financial leverage with a 4.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAKE's 7.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EAT scores 7/9 vs CAKE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+37.1%+123.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.7%+17.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.7%+19.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.8%+25.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage7.93x4.57x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.2B$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$216M$19M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.5B$1.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense16.15x18.61x
EAT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EAT five years ago would be worth $23,182 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,435 for CAKE. Over the past 12 months, CAKE leads with a +24.7% total return vs EAT's +9.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EAT at 58.5% vs CAKE's 24.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.4%-2.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+24.7%+9.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+91.5%+298.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.4%+131.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+37.3%+236.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+24.2%+58.5%
EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CAKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CAKE is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EAT's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAKE currently trades 87.0% from its 52-week high vs EAT's 78.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.11x1.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$69.70$187.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$43.07$100.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.0%+78.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.448.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M1.2M
CAKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates CAKE as "Hold" and EAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for EAT (target: $184) vs 8.1% for CAKE (target: $66). CAKE is the only dividend payer here at 1.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$65.50$184.46
# AnalystsCovering analysts4847
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.08
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.1%+1.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

EAT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CAKE leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallBrinker International, Inc. (EAT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CAKE vs EAT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CAKE or EAT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE). Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CAKE or EAT?

On trailing P/E, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the cheapest at 17. 7x versus The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated at 19. 7x. On forward P/E, Brinker International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CAKE or EAT?

Over the past 5 years, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) delivered a total return of +131. 8%, compared to +4. 4% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EAT returned +236. 3% versus CAKE's +37. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CAKE or EAT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

11β versus Brinker International, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning EAT is approximately 1% more volatile than CAKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 8% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CAKE or EAT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus 4. 7% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brinker International, Inc. grew EPS 144. 7% year-over-year, compared to -4. 1% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, EAT leads at 12. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CAKE or EAT?

Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus 4. 0% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EAT leads at 9. 5% versus 5. 0% for CAKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAKE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CAKE or EAT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EAT: 25. 4% to $184. 46.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CAKE or EAT?

In this comparison, CAKE (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. EAT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CAKE or EAT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

11), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAKE: +37. 3%, EAT: +236. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CAKE and EAT?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CAKE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EAT is a small-cap high-growth stock. CAKE pays a dividend while EAT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CAKE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 46%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EAT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CAKE and EAT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CAKE: 4.4% · EAT: 3.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(CAKE: 4.0% · EAT: 8.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CAKE: 19.7x · EAT: 17.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.