Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CAL vs SCVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
CAL vs SCVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $445M | $487M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.76B | $1.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $58M |
| Gross Margin | 43.0% | 36.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 25.0x | 9.4x |
| Total Debt | $468M | $368M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $109M |
CAL vs SCVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caleres, Inc. (CAL) | 100 | 184.7 | +84.7% |
| Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) | 100 | 136.9 | +36.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAL vs SCVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, CAL is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
SCVL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 2.3%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.3%
- 62.2% 10Y total return vs CAL's -34.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.3% revenue growth vs CAL's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs CAL's -0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.45 vs CAL's 2.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CAL's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.3% vs CAL's -9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs CAL's -0.3%, ROIC 7.8% vs 1.7% |
CAL vs SCVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CAL vs SCVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCVL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 2.4x SCVL's $1.1B. SCVL is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAL's -0.3%. On growth, CAL holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $31M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.0% | +36.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | -3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | -24.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CAL and SCVL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SCVL's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAL's 15.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $445M | $487M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $883M | $747M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -60.20x | 6.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.04x | 9.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.38x | 6.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 0.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.76x | 7.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCVL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCVL delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-1 for CAL. SCVL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCVL scores 5/9 vs CAL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.1% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $438M | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $468M | $368M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.79x | 329.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCVL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCVL five years ago would be worth $6,147 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,508 for CAL. Over the past 12 months, SCVL leads with a +3.3% total return vs CAL's -9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCVL at -5.2% vs CAL's -14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.7% | +3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.3% | +3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.1% | -14.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.9% | -38.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.9% | +62.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.3% | -5.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAL and SCVL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCVL is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAL's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAL currently trades 72.5% from its 52-week high vs SCVL's 67.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.27 | $26.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.80 | $15.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.5% | +67.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 643K | 395K |
Analyst Outlook
SCVL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CAL as "Buy" and SCVL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.9% upside for CAL (target: $18) vs 23.6% for SCVL (target: $22). For income investors, SCVL offers the higher dividend yield at 3.00% vs CAL's 2.19%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $0.53 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% |
SCVL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
CAL vs SCVL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAL or SCVL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is the stronger pick with 2. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Caleres, Inc. (CAL). Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caleres, Inc. (CAL) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAL or SCVL?
On forward P/E, Shoe Carnival, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAL or SCVL?
Over the past 5 years, Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) delivered a total return of -38. 5%, compared to -44. 9% for Caleres, Inc. (CAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCVL returned +62. 2% versus CAL's -34. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAL or SCVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 45β versus Caleres, Inc. 's 2. 34β — meaning CAL is approximately 62% more volatile than SCVL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 77% for Caleres, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAL or SCVL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is pulling ahead at 2. 3% versus 1. 3% for Caleres, Inc. (CAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shoe Carnival, Inc. grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -107. 1% for Caleres, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAL leads at -2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAL or SCVL?
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 1% net margin versus -0. 3% for Caleres, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCVL leads at 7. 6% versus 1. 0% for CAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAL leads at 43. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAL or SCVL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Caleres, Inc. — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAL: 35. 9% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAL or SCVL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 2% for Caleres, Inc. (CAL).
09Is CAL or SCVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shoe Carnival, Inc.
(SCVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 0% yield). Caleres, Inc. (CAL) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCVL: +62. 2%, CAL: -34. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAL and SCVL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SCVL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.