Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CAN vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
CAN vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $356M | $622M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $530M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-210M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 7.8% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -21.0% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $55M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $95M |
CAN vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canaan Inc. (CAN) | 100 | 23.5 | -76.5% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 202.1 | +102.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAN vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 4.41
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- -58.2% 10Y total return vs CAN's -89.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.37, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 5.39x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CAN's 96.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs CAN's -39.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 3.37 vs CAN's 4.41, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.0% vs CAN's -7.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs CAN's -34.9%, ROIC 6.5% vs -24.9% |
CAN vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CAN vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $530M annually — 3.2x BTBT's $164M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAN's -39.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $530M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$66M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$210M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.0% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.7% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +121.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.4% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CAN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $356M | $622M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $330M | $540M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.23x | 9.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 3.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.59x | 0.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-48 for CAN. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAN's 0.13x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -48.1% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -34.9% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.9% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.7% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$26M | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $55M | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -104.52x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BTBT five years ago would be worth $1,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $804 for CAN. Over the past 12 months, BTBT leads with a -4.0% total return vs CAN's -7.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTBT at -5.4% vs CAN's -39.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.1% | -5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.7% | -4.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.8% | -15.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | -83.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.4% | -5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BTBT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BTBT is the less volatile stock with a 3.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAN's 4.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 42.4% from its 52-week high vs CAN's 25.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.41x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.22 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.0% | +42.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 63.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.9M | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
CAN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CAN as "Buy" and BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 306.1% upside for CAN (target: $2) vs 159.1% for BTBT (target: $5). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.25 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CAN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
CAN vs BTBT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAN or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 96. 7% for Canaan Inc. (CAN). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Canaan Inc. (CAN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CAN or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) delivered a total return of -83. 4%, compared to -92. 0% for Canaan Inc. (CAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -58. 2% versus CAN's -89. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CAN or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the lower-risk stock at 3. 37β versus Canaan Inc. 's 4. 41β — meaning CAN is approximately 31% more volatile than BTBT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 13% for Canaan Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CAN or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 96. 7% for Canaan Inc. (CAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 51. 1% for Canaan Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CAN or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -39. 7% for Canaan Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -21. 2% for CAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CAN or BTBT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CAN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CAN or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Canaan Inc. (CAN) carries a higher beta of 4. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BTBT: -58. 2%, CAN: -89. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CAN and BTBT?
These companies operate in different sectors (CAN (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.