Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CAPL vs GLP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
CAPL vs GLP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $812M | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.62B | $18.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $60M | $82M |
| Gross Margin | 8.5% | 5.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 49.5x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $908M | $1.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $12M |
CAPL vs GLP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrossAmerica Partne… (CAPL) | 100 | 141.1 | +41.1% |
| Global Partners LP (GLP) | 100 | 468.1 | +368.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAPL vs GLP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 9.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 0.06, yield 9.9%, current ratio 0.72x
GLP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth -12.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.6%
- 455.9% 10Y total return vs CAPL's 87.5%
- 8.1% revenue growth vs CAPL's -10.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.1% revenue growth vs CAPL's -10.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 49.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs GLP's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs GLP's 0.25 | |
| Dividends | 9.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.7% vs GLP's +1.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs GLP's 2.1%, ROIC 18.1% vs 7.0% |
CAPL vs GLP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CAPL vs GLP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLP is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.6B annually — 4.0x CAPL's $4.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.3% (CAPL) to 0.4% (GLP). On growth, GLP holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.6B | $18.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $200M | $340M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $60M | $82M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $75M | $238M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +5.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +1.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GLP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, CAPL trades at a 14% valuation discount to GLP's 22.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAPL's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLP's 13.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $812M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.54x | 22.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.53x | 14.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.80x | 13.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 0.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.57x | 5.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLP scores 6/9 vs CAPL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.1% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.4% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $905M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $908M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.86x | 2.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLP five years ago would be worth $24,993 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,614 for CAPL. Over the past 12 months, CAPL leads with a +2.7% total return vs GLP's +1.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLP at 23.1% vs CAPL's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.4% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | +1.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.7% | +86.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.1% | +149.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.5% | +455.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.4% | +23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLP's 0.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAPL currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs GLP's 84.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.62 | $56.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.61 | $39.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +84.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 41K |
Analyst Outlook
CAPL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CAPL as "Hold" and GLP as "Sell". CAPL is the only dividend payer here at 9.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.10 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CAPL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GLP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
CAPL vs GLP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAPL or GLP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Global Partners LP (GLP) is the stronger pick with 8.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (49. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAPL or GLP?
On trailing P/E, CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the cheapest at 19.
5x versus Global Partners LP at 22. 6x. On forward P/E, Global Partners LP is actually cheaper at 15. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAPL or GLP?
Over the past 5 years, Global Partners LP (GLP) delivered a total return of +149.
9%, compared to +56. 1% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLP returned +455. 9% versus CAPL's +87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAPL or GLP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Global Partners LP's 0. 25β — meaning GLP is approximately 349% more volatile than CAPL relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CAPL or GLP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global Partners LP (GLP) is pulling ahead at 8.
1% versus -10. 6% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CrossAmerica Partners LP grew EPS 109. 6% year-over-year, compared to -12. 4% for Global Partners LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLP leads at -0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAPL or GLP?
CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
1% net margin versus 0. 4% for Global Partners LP — meaning it keeps 1. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAPL leads at 5. 6% versus 1. 3% for GLP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAPL leads at 9. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAPL or GLP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Global Partners LP (GLP) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for CrossAmerica Partners LP — 34. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAPL or GLP?
In this comparison, CAPL (9.
9% yield) pays a dividend. GLP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CAPL or GLP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 9. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAPL: +87. 5%, GLP: +455. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAPL and GLP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAPL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CAPL pays a dividend while GLP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.