Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CAPL vs SOC vs CIVI vs MMLP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Midstream
CAPL vs SOC vs CIVI vs MMLP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $812M | $1.84T | $2.34B | $100M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.62B | $1M | $4.71B | $711M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $60M | $-498M | $638M | $-20M |
| Gross Margin | 8.5% | -8.7% | 43.9% | 22.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | -367.6% | 31.1% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | 49.5x | 7.5x | 6.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $908M | $0.00 | $4.49B | $525M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $98M | $76M | $49K |
CAPL vs SOC vs CIVI vs MMLP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrossAmerica Partne… (CAPL) | 100 | 98.3 | -1.7% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
| Martin Midstream Pa… (MMLP) | 100 | 121.2 | +21.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAPL vs SOC vs CIVI vs MMLP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 9.9%
- 87.5% 10Y total return vs SOC's 32.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 0.06, yield 9.9%, current ratio 0.72x
SOC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs CAPL's -10.6%
- Better valuation composite
- 13.6% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
MMLP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs CAPL's -10.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 9.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.8% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 18.1% vs -44.6% |
CAPL vs SOC vs CIVI vs MMLP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CAPL vs SOC vs CIVI vs MMLP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories
CIVI leads 2 • SOC leads 0 • MMLP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 3702.4x SOC's $1M. CIVI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, MMLP holds the edge at -2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.6B | $1M | $4.7B | $711M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $200M | -$454M | $3.4B | $91M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $60M | -$498M | $638M | -$20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $75M | -$611M | $934M | $15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | -8.7% | +43.9% | +22.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -367.6% | +31.1% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | -391.5% | +13.6% | -2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -480.4% | +19.8% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | -8.1% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | -5.4% | -33.9% | -5.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 83% valuation discount to CAPL's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MMLP's 6.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $812M | $1.84T | $2.3B | $100M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $1.84T | $6.8B | $625M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.54x | -3.07x | 3.24x | -6.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.53x | 7.50x | 6.75x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.80x | — | 1.89x | 6.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | — | 0.45x | 0.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2359.43x | 0.41x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.57x | — | 2.61x | 7.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAPL leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIVI delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAPL scores 5/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -113.8% | +9.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | -28.9% | +4.2% | -3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.1% | -44.6% | +10.8% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.4% | -37.5% | +12.1% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.68x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $905M | -$98M | $4.4B | $525M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $98M | $76M | $49,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $908M | $0 | $4.5B | $525M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.86x | -2.28x | 2.80x | 0.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAPL five years ago would be worth $15,614 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,438 for MMLP. Over the past 12 months, CIVI leads with a +6.8% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAPL at 10.4% vs CIVI's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.4% | +9.5% | -1.5% | -4.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | -36.8% | +6.8% | -14.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.7% | +26.5% | -41.7% | +5.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.1% | +32.6% | +31.9% | +14.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.5% | +32.4% | -86.2% | -57.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.4% | +8.2% | -16.5% | +1.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAPL currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 1.51x | 1.10x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.62 | $35.00 | $37.45 | $3.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.61 | $3.72 | $25.38 | $2.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +36.7% | +73.1% | +72.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 45.8 | 54.8 | 38.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 5.4M | 22.4M | 19K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAPL and CIVI and MMLP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAPL as "Hold", SOC as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", MMLP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs 13.2% for CIVI (target: $31). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs MMLP's 0.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $31.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 4 | 16 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.9% | — | +18.2% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.10 | — | $4.98 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +18.3% | 0.0% |
CAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CIVI leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CAPL vs SOC vs CIVI vs MMLP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAPL or SOC or CIVI or MMLP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAPL or SOC or CIVI or MMLP?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus CrossAmerica Partners LP at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAPL or SOC or CIVI or MMLP?
Over the past 5 years, CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) delivered a total return of +56.
1%, compared to +14. 4% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAPL returned +87. 5% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAPL or SOC or CIVI or MMLP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 2629% more volatile than CAPL relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CAPL or SOC or CIVI or MMLP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -10. 6% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CrossAmerica Partners LP grew EPS 109. 6% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAPL or SOC or CIVI or MMLP?
Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIVI leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAPL or SOC or CIVI or MMLP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for CrossAmerica Partners LP — 42. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAPL or SOC or CIVI or MMLP?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield), CAPL (9. 9% yield), MMLP (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CAPL or SOC or CIVI or MMLP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 9. 9% yield). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAPL: +87. 5%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAPL and SOC and CIVI and MMLP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAPL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MMLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CAPL, CIVI, MMLP pay a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.