Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CAR vs HTZ vs RCMT vs LYFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Conglomerates
Software - Application
CAR vs HTZ vs RCMT vs LYFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Conglomerates | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $5.44B | $1.93B | $203M | $5.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.75B | $8.70B | $319M | $6.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-667M | $-637M | $16M | $2.86B |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 13.6% | 27.2% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 2.6% | 7.9% | -2.5% |
| Forward P/E | 33.0x | — | 12.3x | 23.8x |
| Total Debt | $31.17B | $19.20B | $26M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $519M | $1.17B | $3M | $1.13B |
CAR vs HTZ vs RCMT vs LYFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avis Budget Group, … (CAR) | 100 | 186.1 | +86.1% |
| Hertz Global Holdin… (HTZ) | 100 | 32.9 | -67.1% |
| RCM Technologies, I… (RCMT) | 100 | 680.7 | +580.7% |
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAR vs HTZ vs RCMT vs LYFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs RCMT's 466.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 1.07, current ratio 0.72x
HTZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RCMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 14.7% revenue growth vs HTZ's -6.0%
- Better valuation composite
- +59.5% vs HTZ's -0.6%
LYFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.2%, EPS growth 122.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.5%
- 43.8% margin vs HTZ's -7.3%
- 39.1% ROA vs HTZ's -2.8%, ROIC -6.1% vs 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% revenue growth vs HTZ's -6.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs HTZ's -7.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs RCMT's 1.30 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.5% vs HTZ's -0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.1% ROA vs HTZ's -2.8%, ROIC -6.1% vs 0.4% |
CAR vs HTZ vs RCMT vs LYFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CAR vs HTZ vs RCMT vs LYFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RCMT leads in 2 of 6 categories
LYFT leads 1 • CAR leads 0 • HTZ leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LYFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.8B annually — 36.8x RCMT's $319M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTZ's -7.3%. On growth, LYFT holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.8B | $8.7B | $319M | $6.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.3B | $1.9B | $27M | -$63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$667M | -$637M | $16M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.9B | -$1.2B | $17M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +13.6% | +27.2% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +2.6% | +7.9% | -2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | -7.3% | +5.1% | +43.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | -14.1% | +5.4% | +17.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +10.5% | +12.4% | +13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.1% | +26.4% | +116.2% | — |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CAR and LYFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 84% valuation discount to RCMT's 13.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAR's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HTZ's 8.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $1.9B | $203M | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $36.1B | $20.0B | $226M | $5.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.10x | -2.56x | 13.30x | 2.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.98x | — | 12.35x | 23.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.87x | 8.47x | 8.01x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.23x | 0.63x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 4.74x | 1.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.67x | 4.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $41 for RCMT. LYFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCMT's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCMT scores 8/9 vs LYFT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | +40.9% | +150.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | -2.8% | +12.5% | +39.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +0.4% | +26.9% | -6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +0.5% | +31.6% | -6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.56x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30.6B | $18.0B | $23M | $145M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $519M | $1.2B | $3M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31.2B | $19.2B | $26M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.92x | 0.37x | 9.05x | -4.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCMT five years ago would be worth $81,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,286 for HTZ. Over the past 12 months, RCMT leads with a +59.5% total return vs HTZ's -0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCMT at 32.8% vs HTZ's -27.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.2% | +18.2% | +44.0% | -28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.3% | -0.6% | +59.5% | +12.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.0% | -62.2% | +134.2% | +65.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.5% | -77.1% | +712.2% | -71.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +536.1% | -77.1% | +466.9% | -81.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.3% | -27.7% | +32.8% | +18.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAR and RCMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAR is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCMT's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCMT currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs CAR's 18.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 1.23x | 1.30x | 1.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $847.70 | $8.44 | $32.50 | $25.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $85.96 | $3.77 | $17.05 | $12.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.2% | +73.1% | +88.0% | +55.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 56.2 | 59.8 | 52.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 11.1M | 67K | 15.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAR and RCMT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAR as "Hold", HTZ as "Hold", RCMT as "Buy", LYFT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.7% upside for LYFT (target: $19) vs -18.0% for CAR (target: $126).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $126.40 | $5.83 | — | $19.21 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 21 | 3 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +3.6% | +9.1% |
RCMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LYFT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
CAR vs HTZ vs RCMT vs LYFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAR or HTZ or RCMT or LYFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 0% for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAR or HTZ or RCMT or LYFT?
On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus RCM Technologies, Inc. at 13. 3x. On forward P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAR or HTZ or RCMT or LYFT?
Over the past 5 years, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) delivered a total return of +712. 2%, compared to -77. 1% for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAR returned +536. 1% versus LYFT's -81. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAR or HTZ or RCMT or LYFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avis Budget Group, Inc.
(CAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus RCM Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning RCMT is approximately 22% more volatile than CAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 56% for RCM Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAR or HTZ or RCMT or LYFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus -6. 0% for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to 28. 0% for RCM Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYFT leads at 15. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAR or HTZ or RCMT or LYFT?
Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -8. 8% for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAR leads at 11. 0% versus -3. 0% for LYFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LYFT leads at 41. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAR or HTZ or RCMT or LYFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 33. 0x for Avis Budget Group, Inc. — 20. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LYFT: 35. 7% to $19. 21.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAR or HTZ or RCMT or LYFT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CAR or HTZ or RCMT or LYFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Avis Budget Group, Inc.
(CAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), +536. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAR: +536. 1%, LYFT: -81. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAR and HTZ and RCMT and LYFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (CAR (Industrials) and HTZ (Industrials) and RCMT (Industrials) and LYFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CAR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HTZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.