Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CAR vs RCMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
CAR vs RCMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $5.44B | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.75B | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-667M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 33.0x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $31.17B | $26M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $519M | $3M |
CAR vs RCMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avis Budget Group, … (CAR) | 100 | 715.6 | +615.6% |
| RCM Technologies, I… (RCMT) | 100 | 2133.6 | +2033.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAR vs RCMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs RCMT's 466.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, current ratio 0.72x
RCMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.7%, EPS growth 28.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 14.7% revenue growth vs CAR's -1.2%
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 33.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% revenue growth vs CAR's -1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 33.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs CAR's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs RCMT's 1.30 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.5% vs CAR's +53.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs CAR's -2.1%, ROIC 26.9% vs 3.8% |
CAR vs RCMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CAR vs RCMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.8B annually — 36.8x RCMT's $319M. RCMT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAR's -5.7%. On growth, RCMT holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.8B | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.3B | $27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$667M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.9B | $17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +12.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.1% | +116.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CAR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CAR's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RCMT's 8.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $36.1B | $226M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.10x | 13.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.98x | 12.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.87x | 8.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCMT scores 8/9 vs CAR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +40.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | +12.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +26.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +31.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30.6B | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $519M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31.2B | $26M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.92x | 9.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCMT five years ago would be worth $81,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,951 for CAR. Over the past 12 months, RCMT leads with a +59.5% total return vs CAR's +53.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCMT at 32.8% vs CAR's 0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.2% | +44.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.3% | +59.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.0% | +134.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.5% | +712.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +536.1% | +466.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.3% | +32.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAR and RCMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAR is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCMT's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCMT currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs CAR's 18.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $847.70 | $32.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $85.96 | $17.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.2% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 67K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CAR as "Hold" and RCMT as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $126.40 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.6% |
RCMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CAR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CAR vs RCMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAR or RCMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Avis Budget Group, Inc. (CAR). RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAR or RCMT?
On forward P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 12. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAR or RCMT?
Over the past 5 years, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) delivered a total return of +712. 2%, compared to +99. 5% for Avis Budget Group, Inc. (CAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAR returned +536. 1% versus RCMT's +466. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAR or RCMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avis Budget Group, Inc.
(CAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus RCM Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning RCMT is approximately 22% more volatile than CAR relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CAR or RCMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus -1. 2% for Avis Budget Group, Inc. (CAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Avis Budget Group, Inc. grew EPS 50. 7% year-over-year, compared to 28. 0% for RCM Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCMT leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAR or RCMT?
RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 1% net margin versus -7. 6% for Avis Budget Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAR leads at 11. 0% versus 7. 9% for RCMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCMT leads at 26. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAR or RCMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 33. 0x for Avis Budget Group, Inc. — 20. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAR or RCMT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CAR or RCMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Avis Budget Group, Inc.
(CAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), +536. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAR: +536. 1%, RCMT: +466. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAR and RCMT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCMT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.