Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CBIO logo
CBIO
KYMR logo
KYMR
JPM logo
JPM
RCUS logo
RCUS
PRAX logo
PRAX
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs RCUS vs PRAX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CBIO
Crescent Biopharma, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$494M
5Y Perf.-93.6%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.04B
5Y Perf.+139.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+227.1%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.40B
5Y Perf.+9.2%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-49.2%

CBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs RCUS vs PRAX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CBIO logoCBIO
KYMR logoKYMR
JPM logoJPM
RCUS logoRCUS
PRAX logoPRAX
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - DiversifiedBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$494M$7.04B$896.00B$2.40B$7.70B
Revenue (TTM)$12M$51M$280.33B$236M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-162M$-315M$57.05B$-369M$-327M
Gross Margin100.0%33.2%60.0%90.7%
Operating Margin-13.7%-7.0%25.9%-168.6%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$2M$82M$942.38B$99M$110K
Cash & Equiv.$213M$357M$343.34B$222M$357M

CBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs RCUS vs PRAXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CBIO
KYMR
JPM
RCUS
PRAX
StockOct 20Jun 26Return
Crescent Biopharma,… (CBIO)1006.4-93.6%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100239.5+139.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100327.1+227.1%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)100109.2+9.2%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10050.8-49.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs RCUS vs PRAX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Crescent Biopharma, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. PRAX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CBIO
Crescent Biopharma, Inc.
The Income Pick

CBIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 0.87
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 6.56x
  • 365.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
  • Beta 0.87 vs RCUS's 2.00, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.91, current ratio 10.47x
Best for: defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 159.2%
  • 20.4% margin vs CBIO's -13.6%
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, RCUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +491.9% vs CBIO's +8.0%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCBIO logoCBIO365.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs CBIO's -13.6%
Stability / SafetyCBIO logoCBIOBeta 0.87 vs RCUS's 2.00, lower leverage
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs CBIO's +8.0%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs CBIO's -88.2%

CBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs RCUS vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CBIOCrescent Biopharma, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$11M
KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M

CBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs RCUS vs PRAX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGRCUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBIO's -13.6%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCBIO logoCBIOCrescent Biopharm…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$12M$51M$280.3B$236M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$163M-$352M$81.4B-$391M-$357M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$162M-$315M$57.0B-$369M-$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$27M-$244M$100.9B-$489M-$283M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+33.2%+60.0%+90.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.7%-7.0%+25.9%-168.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.6%-6.1%+20.4%-156.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.3%-4.7%+36.0%-2.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.5%-39.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.3%+13.4%+16.0%+10.5%+2.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CBIO and KYMR and JPM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricCBIO logoCBIOCrescent Biopharm…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Market CapShares × price$494M$7.0B$896.0B$2.4B$7.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$283M$6.8B$1.50T$2.3B$7.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.40x-23.36x16.00x-7.23x-19.77x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue45.56x179.54x3.20x9.70x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.92x4.61x2.47x4.05x6.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
Evenly matched — CBIO and KYMR and JPM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-101 for CBIO. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBIO scores 7/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCBIO logoCBIOCrescent Biopharm…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-100.9%-25.0%+15.9%-69.0%-43.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-88.2%-22.3%+1.3%-35.3%-40.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-24.9%+4.5%-64.1%-65.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-132.6%-27.2%+8.9%-42.1%-49.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974503
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.05x2.60x0.16x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$212M-$275M$599.0B-$123M-$357M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$213M$357M$343.3B$222M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$82M$942.4B$99M$110,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-148.19x-2119.53x0.74x-13.38x
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $656 for CBIO. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs CBIO's +8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs CBIO's -54.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCBIO logoCBIOCrescent Biopharm…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+61.7%+18.5%-0.5%+2.2%-6.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+8.0%+82.3%+21.8%+154.5%+491.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.3%+242.9%+138.2%+18.3%+1757.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.4%+70.4%+118.2%-3.1%-14.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.7%+159.2%+465.8%+40.0%-36.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-54.0%+50.8%+33.6%+5.8%+164.8%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CBIO and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CBIO is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs CBIO's 65.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCBIO logoCBIOCrescent Biopharm…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x0.91x0.94x2.00x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.41$103.00$337.25$28.72$366.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.72$36.65$262.71$7.91$37.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+65.4%+83.7%+95.1%+82.9%+72.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.356.859.146.531.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded269K492K7.0M1.1M396K
Evenly matched — CBIO and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CBIO as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCBIO logoCBIOCrescent Biopharm…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$33.00$112.60$339.75$31.00$607.15
# AnalystsCovering analysts1326611816
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%0.0%+3.9%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs RCUS vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CBIO or KYMR or JPM or RCUS or PRAX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crescent Biopharma, Inc. (CBIO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — CBIO or KYMR or JPM or RCUS or PRAX?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -93. 4% for Crescent Biopharma, Inc. (CBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CBIO's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — CBIO or KYMR or JPM or RCUS or PRAX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crescent Biopharma, Inc.

(CBIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning RCUS is approximately 131% more volatile than CBIO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — CBIO or KYMR or JPM or RCUS or PRAX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -815. 0% for Crescent Biopharma, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBIO leads at 424. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — CBIO or KYMR or JPM or RCUS or PRAX?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -1419. 6% for Crescent Biopharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -1407. 5% for CBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBIO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is CBIO or KYMR or JPM or RCUS or PRAX more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 127.

8% to $607. 15.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CBIO or KYMR or JPM or RCUS or PRAX?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. CBIO, KYMR, RCUS, PRAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is CBIO or KYMR or JPM or RCUS or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, RCUS: +40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CBIO and KYMR and JPM and RCUS and PRAX?

These companies operate in different sectors (CBIO (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and RCUS (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CBIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while CBIO, KYMR, RCUS, PRAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.