Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CBRL vs DENN vs EAT vs CAKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
CBRL vs DENN vs EAT vs CAKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $696M | $322M | $6.27B | $3.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.36B | $457M | $5.73B | $3.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $10M | $463M | $148M |
| Gross Margin | 25.4% | 43.8% | 46.0% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | -0.4% | 8.4% | 10.4% | 5.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 15.0x | 13.7x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.13B | $408M | $1.69B | $3.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $2M | $19M | $216M |
CBRL vs DENN vs EAT vs CAKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cracker Barrel Old … (CBRL) | 100 | 29.1 | -70.9% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 57.4 | -42.6% |
| Brinker Internation… (EAT) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
| The Cheesecake Fact… (CAKE) | 100 | 283.1 | +183.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBRL vs DENN vs EAT vs CAKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBRL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 3.3%
- 3.3% yield, vs CAKE's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
DENN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.65 vs CBRL's 1.38
- +39.8% vs CBRL's -27.5%
EAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 144.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
- 229.9% 10Y total return vs CAKE's 35.6%
- 21.9% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5%
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 15.0x)
CAKE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 0.59x
- Beta 1.11, yield 1.8%, current ratio 0.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.9% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs CBRL's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs CBRL's 1.38 | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, vs CAKE's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs CBRL's -27.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs CBRL's -0.2%, ROIC 19.1% vs 2.6% |
CBRL vs DENN vs EAT vs CAKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CBRL vs DENN vs EAT vs CAKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
CBRL leads 2 • DENN leads 1 • CAKE leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 12.5x DENN's $457M. EAT is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBRL's -0.1%. On growth, CAKE holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $457M | $5.7B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $120M | $55M | $819M | $296M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $10M | $463M | $148M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$21M | $2M | $504M | $155M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +43.8% | +46.0% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +8.4% | +10.4% | +5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +2.2% | +8.1% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +0.5% | +8.8% | +4.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.9% | +1.3% | +3.2% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -94.2% | -89.9% | +12.1% | -28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CBRL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, CBRL trades at a 24% valuation discount to CAKE's 19.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CBRL's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAKE's 21.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $696M | $322M | $6.3B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $728M | $7.9B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.12x | 15.24x | 17.58x | 19.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.02x | 13.66x | 15.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.40x | 12.10x | 11.06x | 21.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.71x | 1.17x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | — | 18.18x | 6.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.56x | 350.62x | 15.17x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EAT delivers a 123.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $123 in annual profit, vs $-1 for CBRL. CBRL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAKE's 7.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBRL scores 7/9 vs CAKE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.9% | — | +123.4% | +37.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +2.0% | +17.0% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +9.7% | +19.1% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +11.9% | +25.8% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.44x | — | 4.57x | 7.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $406M | $1.7B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $2M | $19M | $216M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $408M | $1.7B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.57x | 1.73x | 18.61x | 16.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EAT five years ago would be worth $22,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,947 for CBRL. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +39.8% total return vs CBRL's -27.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EAT at 58.2% vs CBRL's -27.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.9% | +0.6% | -3.4% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.5% | +39.8% | +5.3% | +23.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.1% | -41.3% | +295.8% | +92.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.5% | -64.9% | +125.8% | +2.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.8% | -42.9% | +229.9% | +35.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.6% | -16.3% | +58.2% | +24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
DENN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DENN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBRL's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CBRL's 43.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 0.65x | 1.12x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.93 | $6.26 | $187.12 | $69.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.85 | $3.36 | $100.30 | $43.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.3% | +99.8% | +78.2% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 66.9 | 50.6 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 0 | 1.2M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
CBRL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBRL as "Hold", DENN as "Buy", EAT as "Buy", CAKE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.1% upside for EAT (target: $184) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6). For income investors, CBRL offers the higher dividend yield at 3.30% vs CAKE's 1.78%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.60 | $6.00 | $184.46 | $65.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 21 | 47 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | — | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.03 | — | — | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +3.6% | +1.4% | +5.1% |
EAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CBRL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
CBRL vs DENN vs EAT vs CAKE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBRL or DENN or EAT or CAKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Denny's Corporation (DENN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBRL or DENN or EAT or CAKE?
On trailing P/E, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
(CBRL) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated at 19. 8x. On forward P/E, Brinker International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBRL or DENN or EAT or CAKE?
Over the past 5 years, Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) delivered a total return of +125. 8%, compared to -70. 5% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EAT returned +229. 9% versus CBRL's -45. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBRL or DENN or EAT or CAKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning CBRL is approximately 112% more volatile than DENN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 8% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBRL or DENN or EAT or CAKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brinker International, Inc. grew EPS 144. 7% year-over-year, compared to -4. 1% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, EAT leads at 12. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBRL or DENN or EAT or CAKE?
Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus 1. 3% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DENN leads at 10. 0% versus 1. 6% for CBRL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAKE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBRL or DENN or EAT or CAKE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EAT: 26. 1% to $184. 46.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBRL or DENN or EAT or CAKE?
In this comparison, CBRL (3.
3% yield), CAKE (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. DENN, EAT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CBRL or DENN or EAT or CAKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
11), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAKE: +35. 6%, EAT: +229. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBRL and DENN and EAT and CAKE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CBRL is a small-cap deep-value stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; EAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAKE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CBRL, CAKE pay a dividend while DENN, EAT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.