Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CBRL vs DIN vs EAT vs DENN vs CAKE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CBRL
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$696M
5Y Perf.-70.9%
DIN
Dine Brands Global, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$369M
5Y Perf.-37.7%
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.27B
5Y Perf.+455.2%
DENN
Denny's Corporation

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$322M
5Y Perf.-42.6%
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.03B
5Y Perf.+183.1%

CBRL vs DIN vs EAT vs DENN vs CAKE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CBRL logoCBRL
DIN logoDIN
EAT logoEAT
DENN logoDENN
CAKE logoCAKE
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$696M$369M$6.27B$322M$3.03B
Revenue (TTM)$3.36B$890M$5.73B$457M$3.75B
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$16M$463M$10M$148M
Gross Margin25.4%39.1%46.0%43.8%78.3%
Operating Margin-0.4%15.9%10.4%8.4%5.0%
Forward P/E15.1x6.0x13.7x15.0x15.0x
Total Debt$1.13B$1.60B$1.69B$408M$3.46B
Cash & Equiv.$40M$128M$19M$2M$216M

CBRL vs DIN vs EAT vs DENN vs CAKELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CBRL
DIN
EAT
DENN
CAKE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Cracker Barrel Old … (CBRL)10029.1-70.9%
Dine Brands Global,… (DIN)10062.3-37.7%
Brinker Internation… (EAT)100555.2+455.2%
Denny's Corporation (DENN)10057.4-42.6%
The Cheesecake Fact… (CAKE)100283.1+183.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CBRL vs DIN vs EAT vs DENN vs CAKE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DIN and EAT are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Brinker International, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. DENN also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CBRL
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
The Income Angle

CBRL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
DIN
Dine Brands Global, Inc.
The Income Pick

DIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.23, yield 7.7%
  • Beta 1.23, yield 7.7%, current ratio 0.96x
  • Lower P/E (6.0x vs 15.0x)
  • 7.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CAKE's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
The Growth Play

EAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 144.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
  • 229.9% 10Y total return vs CAKE's 35.6%
  • 21.9% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5%
  • 8.1% margin vs CBRL's -0.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
DENN
Denny's Corporation
The Defensive Choice

DENN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.65 vs CBRL's 1.38
Best for: stability
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated
The Defensive Pick

CAKE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 0.59x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEAT logoEAT21.9% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5%
ValueDIN logoDINLower P/E (6.0x vs 15.0x)
Quality / MarginsEAT logoEAT8.1% margin vs CBRL's -0.1%
Stability / SafetyDENN logoDENNBeta 0.65 vs CBRL's 1.38
DividendsDIN logoDIN7.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CAKE's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)DIN logoDIN+45.7% vs CBRL's -27.5%
Efficiency (ROA)EAT logoEAT17.0% ROA vs CBRL's -0.2%, ROIC 19.1% vs 2.6%

CBRL vs DIN vs EAT vs DENN vs CAKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CBRLCracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
FY 2024
Restaurant
80.5%$2.8B
Retail
19.5%$677M
DINDine Brands Global, Inc.
FY 2025
Franchisor
86.4%$666M
Company Restaurants
13.6%$105M
EATBrinker International, Inc.
FY 2025
Chili's Restaurants
90.7%$4.9B
Maggiano's Restaurants
9.3%$501M
DENNDenny's Corporation
FY 2024
Franchise
34.7%$241M
Franchisor Owned Outlet
30.6%$212M
Royalty
17.1%$119M
Advertising
11.5%$80M
Occupancy
4.8%$33M
License
1.3%$9M
CAKEThe Cheesecake Factory Incorporated
FY 2025
The Cheesecake Factory
71.7%$2.7B
Other Segments
9.7%$362M
Other FRC
9.5%$355M
North Italia
9.2%$346M

CBRL vs DIN vs EAT vs DENN vs CAKE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEATLAGGINGCAKE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

EAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 12.5x DENN's $457M. EAT is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBRL's -0.1%. On growth, DIN holds the edge at +4.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCBRL logoCBRLCracker Barrel Ol…DIN logoDINDine Brands Globa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.4B$890M$5.7B$457M$3.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$120M$174M$819M$55M$296M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M$16M$463M$10M$148M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$21M$35M$504M$2M$155M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.4%+39.1%+46.0%+43.8%+78.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-0.4%+15.9%+10.4%+8.4%+5.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.1%+1.8%+8.1%+2.2%+4.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.6%+3.9%+8.8%+0.5%+4.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.9%+4.9%+3.2%+1.3%+4.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-94.2%+7.5%+12.1%-89.9%-28.6%
EAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CBRL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.1x trailing earnings, CBRL trades at a 40% valuation discount to DIN's 25.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CBRL's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAKE's 21.2x.

MetricCBRL logoCBRLCracker Barrel Ol…DIN logoDINDine Brands Globa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
Market CapShares × price$696M$369M$6.3B$322M$3.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.8B$1.8B$7.9B$728M$6.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.12x25.26x17.58x15.24x19.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.01x13.66x15.02x15.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.40x9.87x11.06x12.10x21.19x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.20x0.42x1.17x0.71x0.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.52x18.18x6.74x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.56x6.91x15.17x350.62x19.55x
CBRL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

EAT delivers a 123.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $123 in annual profit, vs $-1 for CBRL. CBRL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAKE's 7.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBRL scores 7/9 vs CAKE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCBRL logoCBRLCracker Barrel Ol…DIN logoDINDine Brands Globa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-0.9%+123.4%+37.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.2%+0.9%+17.0%+2.0%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.6%+9.0%+19.1%+9.7%+4.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.4%+10.6%+25.8%+11.9%+7.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976776
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.44x4.57x7.93x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.1B$1.5B$1.7B$406M$3.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$40M$128M$19M$2M$216M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.1B$1.6B$1.7B$408M$3.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.57x2.79x18.61x1.73x16.15x
EAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EAT five years ago would be worth $22,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,947 for CBRL. Over the past 12 months, DIN leads with a +45.7% total return vs CBRL's -27.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EAT at 58.2% vs CBRL's -27.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCBRL logoCBRLCracker Barrel Ol…DIN logoDINDine Brands Globa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.9%-14.3%-3.4%+0.6%+15.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.5%+45.7%+5.3%+39.8%+23.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-62.1%-46.5%+295.8%-41.3%+92.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-70.5%-62.9%+125.8%-64.9%+2.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-45.8%-41.5%+229.9%-42.9%+35.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-27.6%-18.8%+58.2%-16.3%+24.3%
EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

DENN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

DENN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBRL's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CBRL's 43.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCBRL logoCBRLCracker Barrel Ol…DIN logoDINDine Brands Globa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.38x1.23x1.12x0.65x1.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$71.93$39.68$187.12$6.26$69.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.85$19.52$100.30$3.36$43.07
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+43.3%+71.3%+78.2%+99.8%+87.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.446.850.666.950.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M361K1.2M01.2M
DENN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

DIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CBRL as "Hold", DIN as "Hold", EAT as "Buy", DENN as "Buy", CAKE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for DIN (target: $36) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6). For income investors, DIN offers the higher dividend yield at 7.66% vs CAKE's 1.78%.

MetricCBRL logoCBRLCracker Barrel Ol…DIN logoDINDine Brands Globa…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.60$36.33$184.46$6.00$65.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts3124472148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.3%+7.7%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises04000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.03$2.17$1.08
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+16.4%+1.4%+3.6%+5.1%
DIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

EAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CBRL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallBrinker International, Inc. (EAT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CBRL vs DIN vs EAT vs DENN vs CAKE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CBRL or DIN or EAT or DENN or CAKE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CBRL or DIN or EAT or DENN or CAKE?

On trailing P/E, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.

(CBRL) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Dine Brands Global, Inc. at 25. 3x. On forward P/E, Dine Brands Global, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CBRL or DIN or EAT or DENN or CAKE?

Over the past 5 years, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) delivered a total return of +125. 8%, compared to -70. 5% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EAT returned +229. 9% versus CBRL's -45. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CBRL or DIN or EAT or DENN or CAKE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

65β versus Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning CBRL is approximately 112% more volatile than DENN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 8% for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CBRL or DIN or EAT or DENN or CAKE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brinker International, Inc. grew EPS 144. 7% year-over-year, compared to -73. 5% for Dine Brands Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EAT leads at 12. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CBRL or DIN or EAT or DENN or CAKE?

Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus 1. 3% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DIN leads at 16. 3% versus 1. 6% for CBRL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAKE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CBRL or DIN or EAT or DENN or CAKE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Dine Brands Global, Inc.

(DIN) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIN: 28. 4% to $36. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CBRL or DIN or EAT or DENN or CAKE?

In this comparison, DIN (7.

7% yield), CBRL (3. 3% yield), CAKE (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. EAT, DENN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CBRL or DIN or EAT or DENN or CAKE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

11), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAKE: +35. 6%, EAT: +229. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CBRL and DIN and EAT and DENN and CAKE?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CBRL is a small-cap deep-value stock; DIN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; CAKE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CBRL, DIN, CAKE pay a dividend while EAT, DENN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CBRL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DIN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EAT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DENN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CAKE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 46%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CBRL and DIN and EAT and DENN and CAKE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CBRL: -7.9% · DIN: 4.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CBRL: 15.1x · DIN: 25.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.