Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CBUS vs SEED
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
CBUS vs SEED — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $686M | $9M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $102M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-127M | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | -26.8% | -72.6% |
| Total Debt | $33M | $54M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $16M |
CBUS vs SEED — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| Origin Agritech Lim… (SEED) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBUS vs SEED
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBUS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 3.12
- Rev growth -14.6%, EPS growth 74.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 185.1%
- -14.6% revenue growth vs SEED's -20.5%
SEED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -93.2% 10Y total return vs CBUS's -99.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.44x
- Beta 0.94, current ratio 0.44x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -14.6% revenue growth vs SEED's -20.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -42.6% margin vs CBUS's -34.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs CBUS's 3.12 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.7% vs CBUS's -40.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -38.6% ROA vs SEED's -42.3% |
CBUS vs SEED — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CBUS vs SEED — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEED is the larger business by revenue, generating $102M annually — 28.0x CBUS's $4M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -42.6% (SEED) to -34.9% (CBUS). On growth, SEED holds the edge at +75.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $102M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$92M | -$74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$127M | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$51M | -$40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +5.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.8% | -72.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -34.9% | -42.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.1% | -39.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.8% | +75.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.2% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SEED leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $686M | $9M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $709M | $14M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.54x | -1.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 188.61x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 31.44x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBUS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.6% | -42.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -61.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.8% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.51x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | $38M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $54M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.49x | -23.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SEED leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SEED five years ago would be worth $859 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $69 for CBUS. Over the past 12 months, SEED leads with a -1.7% total return vs CBUS's -40.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEED at -43.2% vs CBUS's -54.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.2% | -1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.0% | -1.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | -81.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -91.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -93.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -54.4% | -43.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SEED leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEED is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBUS's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEED currently trades 45.8% from its 52-week high vs CBUS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.12x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $2.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.09 | $0.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.8% | +45.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 603K | 93K |
Analyst Outlook
CBUS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SEED leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CBUS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook).
CBUS vs SEED: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBUS or SEED a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cibus, Inc.
(CBUS) is the stronger pick with -14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 5% for Origin Agritech Limited (SEED). Analysts rate Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CBUS or SEED?
Over the past 5 years, Origin Agritech Limited (SEED) delivered a total return of -91.
4%, compared to -99. 3% for Cibus, Inc. (CBUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEED returned -93. 2% versus CBUS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CBUS or SEED?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Origin Agritech Limited (SEED) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
94β versus Cibus, Inc. 's 3. 12β — meaning CBUS is approximately 233% more volatile than SEED relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CBUS or SEED?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cibus, Inc.
(CBUS) is pulling ahead at -14. 6% versus -20. 5% for Origin Agritech Limited (SEED). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cibus, Inc. grew EPS 74. 3% year-over-year, compared to -319. 7% for Origin Agritech Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBUS leads at 185. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CBUS or SEED?
Origin Agritech Limited (SEED) is the more profitable company, earning -58.
4% net margin versus -34. 9% for Cibus, Inc. — meaning it keeps -58. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEED leads at -58. 9% versus -1853. 9% for CBUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEED leads at 7. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CBUS or SEED?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CBUS or SEED better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Origin Agritech Limited (SEED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
94)). Cibus, Inc. (CBUS) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEED: -93. 2%, CBUS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CBUS and SEED?
These companies operate in different sectors (CBUS (Healthcare) and SEED (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.