Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CCBG logo
CCBG
CNOB logo
CNOB
NBTB logo
NBTB
TRMK logo
TRMK
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CCBG
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$808M
5Y Perf.+124.9%
CNOB
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.65B
5Y Perf.+103.3%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.70B
5Y Perf.+87.2%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CCBG logoCCBG
CNOB logoCNOB
NBTB logoNBTB
TRMK logoTRMK
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$808M$1.65B$2.52B$2.70B$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$279M$676M$902M$1.16B$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$62M$80M$169M$224M$2.67B
Gross Margin87.1%49.9%73.6%64.7%37.6%
Operating Margin30.0%16.7%24.3%24.2%17.9%
Forward P/E13.0x10.0x11.5x11.8x6.2x
Total Debt$93M$1.17B$327M$1.12B$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$62M$92M$185M$668M$599M

CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CCBG
CNOB
NBTB
TRMK
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Capital City Bank G… (CCBG)100224.9+124.9%
ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB)100203.3+103.3%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK)100187.2+87.2%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Capital City Bank Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. CNOB and TRMK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CCBG
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CCBG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 257.8% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 127.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 1.24x
  • Beta 0.56, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.24x
  • NIM 3.9% vs CNOB's 2.5%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
CNOB
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CNOB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +45.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: momentum
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
Best for: income & stability
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation
The Banking Pick

TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
  • 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
Best for: growth exposure
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.26 vs NBTB's 1.64
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.46
  • 22.9% margin vs CNOB's 11.9%
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTRMK logoTRMK34.8% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.46
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs CNOB's 11.9%
Stability / SafetyCCBG logoCCBGBeta 0.56 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0%
Momentum (1Y)CNOB logoCNOB+45.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs CNOB's 0.6%, ROIC 6.0% vs 3.5%

CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
CCBGCapital City Bank Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit fees
29.7%$22M
Wealth management fees
27.8%$21M
Mortgage Banking Revenues
22.8%$17M
Bank card fees
19.8%$15M
CNOBConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
TRMKTrustmark Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCCBGLAGGINGTRMK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CCBG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 41.7x CCBG's $279M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNOB's 11.9%.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$279M$676M$902M$1.2B$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$89M$122M$241M$323M$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$62M$80M$169M$224M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$98M$102M$225M$230M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.1%+49.9%+73.6%+64.7%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+30.0%+16.7%+24.3%+24.2%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+22.0%+11.9%+18.8%+19.3%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+35.1%+15.1%+24.9%+19.8%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.8%+53.1%+39.5%+5.4%+30.6%
CCBG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.4x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 76% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CCBG offers better value at 0.94x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$808M$1.6B$2.5B$2.7B$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$839M$2.7B$2.7B$3.2B$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.09x22.14x14.47x12.41x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.04x10.04x11.54x11.75x6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.94x2.06x1.54x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.39x24.17x11.03x9.67x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.89x2.72x2.90x2.41x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.46x1.05x1.29x1.31x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.10x16.31x11.49x11.65x7.21x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CCBG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNOB. CCBG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNOB's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCBG scores 7/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.5%+5.5%+9.5%+10.8%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+0.6%+1.1%+1.2%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.3%+3.5%+7.9%+7.1%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.4%+1.5%+2.4%+3.2%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974776
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x0.74x0.17x0.53x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$31M$1.1B$142M$448M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$62M$92M$185M$668M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$93M$1.2B$327M$1.1B$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.56x0.39x1.05x0.75x21.16x
CCBG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CCBG and CNOB and TRMK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CCBG five years ago would be worth $19,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CNOB leads with a +45.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 29.2% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.6%+26.9%+17.6%+18.7%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+27.9%+45.1%+18.3%+35.5%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.7%+114.8%+48.5%+115.6%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.7%+32.8%+44.4%+56.8%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+257.8%+139.7%+108.5%+127.3%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.9%+29.0%+14.1%+29.2%-6.8%
Evenly matched — CCBG and CNOB and TRMK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CCBG and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CCBG is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNOB's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.56x1.02x0.76x0.82x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$48.78$32.87$48.27$46.03$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$35.94$21.79$39.20$33.39$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.6%+99.7%+99.8%+99.7%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.869.963.160.130.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded77K328K266K330K5.6M
Evenly matched — CCBG and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CCBG as "Hold", CNOB as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CNOB's 1.93%.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.50$34.00$46.00$45.50$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts71110937
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+1.9%+3.0%+2.1%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1171311
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.00$0.63$1.43$0.97$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+0.4%+3.0%+7.0%
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CCBG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallCapital City Bank Group, In… (CCBG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.

4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

(CCBG) delivered a total return of +95. 7%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCBG returned +257. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

(CCBG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning CNOB is approximately 81% more volatile than CCBG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 74% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.

8% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capital City Bank Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or FIS?

Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

(CCBG) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCBG leads at 30. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCBG leads at 87. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for Capital City Bank Group, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 9% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB).

09

Is CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

(CCBG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), 2. 1% yield, +257. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCBG: +257. 8%, CNOB: +139. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CCBG and CNOB and NBTB and TRMK and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (CCBG (Financial Services) and CNOB (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and TRMK (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CCBG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.