Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $808M | $534M | $3.13B | $2.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $209M | $898M | $902M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $62M | $46M | $145M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 71.0% | 62.8% | 73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 27.7% | 20.8% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 11.4x | 12.8x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $93M | $58M | $1.34B | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $142M | $181M | $185M |
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital City Bank G… (CCBG) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) | 100 | 254.5 | +154.5% |
| Seacoast Banking Co… (SBCF) | 100 | 157.3 | +57.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCBG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 257.8% 10Y total return vs HBCP's 185.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 1.24x
- NIM 3.9% vs SBCF's 2.7%
- Beta 0.56 vs SBCF's 1.10, lower leverage
HBCP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.74 vs SBCF's 6.84
- Lower P/E (11.4x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.74 vs 1.64
- +36.4% vs NBTB's +18.3%
SBCF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CCBG's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CCBG's 0.6%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs HBCP's 4.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs HBCP's 4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.74 vs 1.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CCBG's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs SBCF's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs SBCF's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.4% vs NBTB's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CCBG's 0.6% |
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories
CCBG leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • SBCF leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCBG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 4.3x HBCP's $209M. CCBG is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBCF's 16.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $209M | $898M | $902M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | $60M | $202M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $62M | $46M | $145M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $98M | $44M | $179M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | +71.0% | +62.8% | +73.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +27.7% | +20.8% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +22.0% | +16.1% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | +21.2% | +19.9% | +24.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.8% | +20.7% | -27.5% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, HBCP trades at a 43% valuation discount to SBCF's 20.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HBCP offers better value at 0.75x vs SBCF's 10.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $808M | $534M | $3.1B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $839M | $450M | $4.3B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | 11.60x | 20.30x | 14.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.04x | 11.44x | 12.81x | 11.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | 0.75x | 10.84x | 2.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.39x | 7.75x | 22.99x | 11.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 2.55x | 3.60x | 2.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 1.23x | 0.97x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.10x | 12.03x | 17.51x | 11.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCBG delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $6 for SBCF. HBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBCF's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HBCP scores 9/9 vs SBCF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.5% | +11.0% | +5.8% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.3% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +7.7% | +3.9% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +5.7% | +3.7% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.13x | 0.44x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | -$84M | $1.2B | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $142M | $181M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $58M | $1.3B | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.56x | 0.96x | 0.66x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCBG five years ago would be worth $19,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,006 for SBCF. Over the past 12 months, HBCP leads with a +36.4% total return vs NBTB's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBCP at 27.5% vs SBCF's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +19.6% | +2.1% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.9% | +36.4% | +27.3% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.7% | +107.3% | +47.0% | +48.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.7% | +93.5% | +0.1% | +44.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +257.8% | +185.9% | +115.4% | +108.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +27.5% | +13.7% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCBG and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCBG is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBCF's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs SBCF's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 0.73x | 1.10x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.78 | $68.40 | $35.55 | $48.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.94 | $48.30 | $24.46 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +99.5% | +90.2% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 65.3 | 58.4 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 77K | 88K | 679K | 266K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCBG as "Hold", HBCP as "Buy", SBCF as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.1% upside for CCBG (target: $50) vs -26.6% for HBCP (target: $50). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs HBCP's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.50 | $50.00 | $32.50 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 3 | 16 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +1.7% | +2.3% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 12 | 4 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $1.15 | $0.74 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
HBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CCBG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 9% for Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP). Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida at 20. 3x. On forward P/E, Home Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 84x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) delivered a total return of +95. 7%, compared to +0. 1% for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCBG returned +257. 8% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 1. 10β — meaning SBCF is approximately 95% more volatile than CCBG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 44% for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 4. 9% for Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 28. 4% year-over-year, compared to 11. 3% for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB?
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus 16. 7% for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCBG leads at 30. 0% versus 21. 4% for SBCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCBG leads at 87. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 84x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for Capital City Bank Group, Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCBG: 5. 1% to $49. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 7% for Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP).
09Is CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), 2. 1% yield, +257. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCBG: +257. 8%, SBCF: +115. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCBG and HBCP and SBCF and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCBG is a small-cap deep-value stock; HBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.