Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CCBG vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
CCBG vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $808M | $2.52B | $1.65B | $2.70B | $20.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $902M | $676M | $1.16B | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $62M | $169M | $80M | $224M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 73.6% | 49.9% | 64.7% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 24.3% | 16.7% | 24.2% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 11.5x | 10.0x | 11.8x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $93M | $327M | $1.17B | $1.12B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $185M | $92M | $668M | $599M |
CCBG vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital City Bank G… (CCBG) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB) | 100 | 203.3 | +103.3% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 187.2 | +87.2% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCBG vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCBG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 257.8% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 127.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 1.24x
- Beta 0.56, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.24x
- NIM 3.9% vs CNOB's 2.5%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
CNOB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +45.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.26 vs NBTB's 1.64
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.46
- 22.9% margin vs CNOB's 11.9%
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.46 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs CNOB's 11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs CNOB's 0.6%, ROIC 6.0% vs 3.5% |
CCBG vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CCBG vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CCBG leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • CNOB leads 0 • TRMK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCBG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 41.7x CCBG's $279M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNOB's 11.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $902M | $676M | $1.2B | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | $241M | $122M | $323M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $62M | $169M | $80M | $224M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $98M | $225M | $102M | $230M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | +73.6% | +49.9% | +64.7% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +24.3% | +16.7% | +24.2% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +18.8% | +11.9% | +19.3% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | +24.9% | +15.1% | +19.8% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.8% | +39.5% | +53.1% | +5.4% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 76% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CCBG offers better value at 0.94x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $808M | $2.5B | $1.6B | $2.7B | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $839M | $2.7B | $2.7B | $3.2B | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | 14.47x | 22.14x | 12.41x | 52.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.04x | 11.54x | 10.04x | 11.75x | 6.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | 2.06x | — | 1.54x | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.39x | 11.03x | 24.17x | 9.67x | 6.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 2.90x | 2.72x | 2.41x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 1.29x | 1.05x | 1.31x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.10x | 11.49x | 16.31x | 11.65x | 7.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCBG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNOB. CCBG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNOB's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCBG scores 7/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.5% | +9.5% | +5.5% | +10.8% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.1% | +0.6% | +1.2% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +7.9% | +3.5% | +7.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +2.4% | +1.5% | +3.2% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.17x | 0.74x | 0.53x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $142M | $1.1B | $448M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $185M | $92M | $668M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $327M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.56x | 1.05x | 0.39x | 0.75x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CCBG and CNOB and TRMK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCBG five years ago would be worth $19,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CNOB leads with a +45.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 29.2% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +17.6% | +26.9% | +18.7% | -38.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.9% | +18.3% | +45.1% | +35.5% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.7% | +48.5% | +114.8% | +115.6% | -18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.7% | +44.4% | +32.8% | +56.8% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +257.8% | +108.5% | +139.7% | +127.3% | -25.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +14.1% | +29.0% | +29.2% | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCBG and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCBG is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNOB's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 0.76x | 1.02x | 0.82x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.78 | $48.27 | $32.87 | $46.03 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.94 | $39.20 | $21.79 | $33.39 | $37.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +99.8% | +99.7% | +99.7% | +47.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 63.1 | 69.9 | 60.1 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 77K | 266K | 328K | 330K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCBG as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CNOB as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CNOB's 1.93%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.50 | $46.00 | $34.00 | $45.50 | $62.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +3.0% | +1.9% | +2.1% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $1.43 | $0.63 | $0.97 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.1% | +3.0% | +7.0% |
CCBG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CCBG vs NBTB vs CNOB vs TRMK vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCBG or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCBG or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCBG or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) delivered a total return of +95. 7%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCBG returned +257. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCBG or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning CNOB is approximately 81% more volatile than CCBG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 74% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCBG or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capital City Bank Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCBG or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK or FIS?
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCBG leads at 30. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCBG leads at 87. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCBG or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for Capital City Bank Group, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCBG or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 9% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB).
09Is CCBG or NBTB or CNOB or TRMK or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), 2. 1% yield, +257. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCBG: +257. 8%, CNOB: +139. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCBG and NBTB and CNOB and TRMK and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCBG (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and CNOB (Financial Services) and TRMK (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCBG is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.