Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CCBG vs SBCF vs NBTB vs JPM vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Information Technology Services
CCBG vs SBCF vs NBTB vs JPM vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $808M | $3.13B | $2.52B | $896.00B | $20.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $898M | $902M | $280.33B | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $62M | $145M | $169M | $57.05B | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 62.8% | 73.6% | 60.0% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 20.8% | 24.3% | 25.9% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 12.8x | 11.5x | 14.4x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $93M | $1.34B | $327M | $942.38B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $181M | $185M | $343.34B | $599M |
CCBG vs SBCF vs NBTB vs JPM vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital City Bank G… (CCBG) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| Seacoast Banking Co… (SBCF) | 100 | 157.3 | +57.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCBG vs SBCF vs NBTB vs JPM vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCBG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and bank quality is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 1.24x
- NIM 3.9% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Beta 0.56 vs SBCF's 1.10, lower leverage
- +27.9% vs FIS's -49.4%
SBCF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs CCBG's 257.8%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.26 vs SBCF's 6.84
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
- 22.9% margin vs SBCF's 16.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs SBCF's 16.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs SBCF's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.9% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs SBCF's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 3.9% |
CCBG vs SBCF vs NBTB vs JPM vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCBG vs SBCF vs NBTB vs JPM vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
CCBG leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • SBCF leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CCBG and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1003.7x CCBG's $279M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBCF's 16.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $898M | $902M | $280.3B | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | $202M | $241M | $81.4B | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $62M | $145M | $169M | $57.0B | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $98M | $179M | $225M | $100.9B | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | +62.8% | +73.6% | +60.0% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +20.8% | +24.3% | +25.9% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +16.1% | +18.8% | +20.4% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | +19.9% | +24.9% | +36.0% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.8% | -27.5% | +39.5% | +16.0% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, CCBG trades at a 75% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs SBCF's 10.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $808M | $3.1B | $2.5B | $896.0B | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $839M | $4.3B | $2.7B | $1.50T | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | 20.30x | 14.47x | 16.00x | 52.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.04x | 12.81x | 11.54x | 14.40x | 6.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | 10.84x | 2.06x | 0.90x | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.39x | 22.99x | 11.03x | 18.36x | 6.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 3.60x | 2.90x | 3.20x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 0.97x | 1.29x | 2.47x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.10x | 17.51x | 11.49x | 8.88x | 7.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCBG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $6 for SBCF. CCBG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCBG scores 7/9 vs SBCF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.5% | +5.8% | +9.5% | +15.9% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.3% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +3.9% | +7.9% | +4.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +3.7% | +2.4% | +8.9% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.44x | 0.17x | 2.60x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $1.2B | $142M | $599.0B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $181M | $185M | $343.3B | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $1.3B | $327M | $942.4B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.56x | 0.66x | 1.05x | 0.74x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CCBG leads with a +27.9% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +2.1% | +17.6% | -0.5% | -38.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.9% | +27.3% | +18.3% | +21.8% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.7% | +47.0% | +48.5% | +138.2% | -18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.7% | +0.1% | +44.4% | +118.2% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +257.8% | +115.4% | +108.5% | +465.8% | -25.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +13.7% | +14.1% | +33.6% | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCBG and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCBG is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBCF's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 1.10x | 0.76x | 0.94x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.78 | $35.55 | $48.27 | $337.25 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.94 | $24.46 | $39.20 | $262.71 | $37.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +90.2% | +99.8% | +95.1% | +47.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 58.4 | 63.1 | 59.1 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 77K | 679K | 266K | 7.0M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCBG as "Hold", SBCF as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.50 | $32.50 | $46.00 | $339.75 | $62.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 16 | 10 | 61 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.3% | +3.0% | +1.9% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 4 | 13 | 15 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $0.74 | $1.43 | $5.95 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.9% | +7.0% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). CCBG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CCBG vs SBCF vs NBTB vs JPM vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCBG or SBCF or NBTB or JPM or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCBG or SBCF or NBTB or JPM or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) is the cheapest at 13. 1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 84x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCBG or SBCF or NBTB or JPM or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCBG or SBCF or NBTB or JPM or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 1. 10β — meaning SBCF is approximately 95% more volatile than CCBG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCBG or SBCF or NBTB or JPM or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capital City Bank Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCBG or SBCF or NBTB or JPM or FIS?
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCBG leads at 30. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCBG leads at 87. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCBG or SBCF or NBTB or JPM or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 84x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCBG or SBCF or NBTB or JPM or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is CCBG or SBCF or NBTB or JPM or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), 2. 1% yield, +257. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCBG: +257. 8%, SBCF: +115. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCBG and SBCF and NBTB and JPM and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCBG (Financial Services) and SBCF (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCBG is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.